Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

Marine Corps vs. Peace Corps


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> Marine Corps vs. Peace Corps Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Marine Corps vs. Peace Corps - 3/14/2012 10:25:18 PM   
Fightdirecto


Posts: 1101
Joined: 8/3/2004
Status: offline
Marine Corps vs the Peace Corps
quote:

I have a bone to pick with a politician named Sean Bielat.

Bielat, a Republican from Norfolk, Massachusetts, wants to be my new representative in Congress. Redistricting has moved my home in Utopia by Bosky Dell out of the old Second District and into the southeastern tip of the new Fourth District, which is being vacated by retiring Rep. Barney Frank.

Recently, Bielat did some campaigning in Hopkinton, Massachusetts, meeting with a small group of potential Republican voters.

According to a Boston Globe reporter who attended the session, Bielat “touted his service in the Marine Corps.”

No problem there. I commend Bielat, whose rank of major in the Marine reserve matches my Navy rank of lieutenant commander (retired). Semper Fi and all that.

However, according to the Boston Globe report, Bielat drew a big round of applause when he said, “I’ll take the Marine Corps over the Peace Corps any day.”

So, here’s my gripe: Why did Bielat find it necessary to put down the Peace Corps?

My oldest son, Warren, followed my footsteps and joined the Navy. His younger brother, Alan, joined the Peace Corps. They served their country in very different ways and I am equally proud of both for their service.

Warren was assigned to a squadron of fighter/bombers, and the planes he serviced were among those that destroyed Libyan chemical weapons facilities in 1986.

Alan taught English to children and made friends for the United States in the islands of Micronesia. Both were honorable missions.

So why the words of disrespect for the Peace Corps from a Republican candidate for Congress?...

Lord knows we’re hearing enough about war from Republicans these days, with three irresponsible presidential candidates practically drooling over the prospect of doing battle with Iran...

Mitt Romney, Rick Santorum and Newt Gingrich are saying things that undermine President Obama’s diplomatic efforts to keep Iran from building a nuclear weapon.

Obama has experienced sending our troops off to finish George Bush’s needless war in Iraq and the long struggle in Afghanistan. Obama has experienced speaking with the families of young men and women who were killed in those wars.

The three blathering Republican troubadours have not.

Romney had the nerve to call Obama “America’s most feckless president since (Jimmy) Carter.” My dictionary defines feckless as “lacking purpose or vitality.” Please explain to me how “feckless” describes a president who pursued Osama Bin Laden to his death, helped convince Egypt’s President Hosni Mubarak to step aside and led the United Nations charge that brought down Libya’s Colonel Khadafy.

In these delicate times, we don’t need the screeching of hawkish presidential wannabes who have no responsibility for military actions. Someone should remind them that when Robert Gates retired as defense secretary he said that any American leader who proposes another war in the Middle East should have his head examined.

And while we’re on the subject, I have a question for the Republicans in Hopkinton who applauded Bielat’s dissing of the Peace Corps: Do you folks have a problem with peace?

Gingrich, Romney and Santorum - a mini-flock of Chickenhawks.






Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Fightdirecto -- 3/14/2012 10:26:47 PM >


_____________________________

"I swore never to be silent whenever and wherever human beings endure suffering and humiliation. We must always take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented.””
- Ellie Wiesel
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: Marine Corps vs. Peace Corps - 3/15/2012 8:07:15 AM   
kalikshama


Posts: 14805
Joined: 8/8/2010
Status: offline
Colbert proposed a no-Chickenhawk 13th Step to No Labels' 12 Steps to Make Congress Work action plan

http://www.colbertnation.com/the-colbert-report-videos/410654/march-14-2012/mark-mckinnon

(in reply to Fightdirecto)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: Marine Corps vs. Peace Corps - 3/15/2012 12:50:56 PM   
wolf223


Posts: 89
Joined: 3/4/2011
Status: offline


Democrates are for birth control.
Repuliblicans don't like it they have their own form
of birth control they call it WAR.

(in reply to kalikshama)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: Marine Corps vs. Peace Corps - 3/15/2012 1:44:37 PM   
Aylee


Posts: 24103
Joined: 10/14/2007
Status: offline
~Fast Reply~

The comment, "I’ll take the Marine Corps over the Peace Corps any day." Sounds like Hoo-ah crap to me. For example, grandfather was navy, father was navy, I went army, nephew went army. Army-Navy game comes around and the other branch gets 'trash-talked.' We all make fun of the marines (muscles are required, intelligence not encouraged) and the air force.

My point being is that I do not think it had anything to do with the Peace Corps per se, just that they were other than marines.

_____________________________

Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

I don’t always wgah’nagl fhtagn. But when I do, I ph’nglui mglw’nafh R’lyeh.

(in reply to wolf223)
Profile   Post #: 4
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> Marine Corps vs. Peace Corps Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.063