|
Musicmystery -> RE: "Change your Future Through Time Openings" By French Physicist Jean Pierre Garnier-Malet (3/16/2012 9:39:26 PM)
|
quote:
I feel like I'm missing the joke here. Can someone clue me in?
Well...OK....from his 2006 paper introduction....
2. THE FUNDAMENTAL MOVEMENT 2.1. Particles and Horizons
In previous papers, I have proposed a new paradigm that does not use the classical space-time concept. Instead of one infinite continuous referential frame (with one time direction), which is associated to an observer who has a clock, this new paradigm requires a high level system of theoretical observers who are related to several embedded finite structures of space-time domain of different scale levels.
Any physical observable is related to a theoretical observer of the same scale level. All scale levels can be all possible embedding levels from the quantum level to cosmological levels. At each scale level, a theoretical observer has a finite horizon of observation that is the limit of his associated finite space-time structure. The horizon of any observer is supposed to be circular into a plane moving in the space. It is a "dynamical circular" horizon. Observers are not independent of the studied system, like in quantum mechanics (Niels Bohr), and therefore, the chosen embedded structures are always relative to the studied system. So each theoretical observer is dependent on the observed subspace within his horizon.
These embedded finite "dynamical circular" structures are dynamically built as a geometric construct, using a particular geometric transformation from level to level, which is named "fundamental doubling movement". Theoretical observers successively appear while building the geometric construct, thus they all have different initial conditions. Each embedded finite structure has its own dynamical "circular" limit that is named the "horizon". Each embedded finite structure of any level is built with the same fundamental doubling movement and this principle is a new type of scale invariance.
In this new paradigm, the word "particle" designates an embedded circular and dynamical structure moving in the embedding circular and dynamical structure of the next upper level. At a given scale in a system of embedded structures, let’s consider a dynamical circle Ω containing the dynamical circles Ω1, Ω2, ..., Ωn of the next lower
237
scales. In this theory, Ω1, Ω2, ..., Ωn are considered as "particles" in the domain Ω which is their dynamical horizon, and we can say "the particle Ω1 in its horizon Ω". From a semantic point of view a particle in the Doubling Theory may be either an elementary particle of quantum physics, a planet in a solar system, or a galaxy in the universe, depending on the considered scale level. This doubling movement is built from a geometry similar to the geometry of relativity [23]. A particle Ωn in its horizon Ω is geometrically transformed through a "double movement": one is a radial movement of (Ωn)r inside the dynamical and circular Ω and the second is a tangential movement of (Ω1)t along the dynamical circle Ω. The radial movement of (Ωn)r is always going through the centre of Ω: it is not rectilinear at all, but it slightly fluctuates on the circumferences of chained smaller circles Ωn which are a dynamical and circular horizon of a lower scale level. So the radial movement of Ωn in its horizon Ω can be considered as a tangential movement of particles along the horizon Ωn. And so on at each level.
In this paper, we shall see again the definition of this fundamental movement, called the "spinback" [8, 9 and 10]: after a rotation of the horizon Ω of an angle π, (Ωn)r meets (Ωn)t: it is the “end of the movement”, where (Ωn)r and (Ωn)t can exchange information by the exchange of their path. In the Doubling Theory, time depends on the observer because it is related to his horizon, and the time flow is discrete, i.e. stroboscopic as explained in ref. [10] with periodic "openings" of time windows with a duration ∆t which is unperceivable to the observer, although these "openings" can be perceived by an other theoretical observer who experiences another time flow with a shorter ∆t’.
The fundamental doubling movement has been justified and verified for the solar system [8]. It concerns any particle evolving within its horizon, which is its space of interaction and observation. Each horizon, or space, is also considered, in its turn, as a particle within its own, larger horizon. The solar system is modeled as an anticipatory system of seven embedded horizons. As in all stellar systems, this fundamental doubling movement provides to the observers evolving within it, a doubling of space and a doubling of time. Six planetary spaces which are embedded in the same doubling transformation define three flows of time: these time flows are accelerated [8] between flow of "time 1" (past), flow of "time 4" (present) and flow of "time 7" (future). Each time flow corresponds to a possibility of observation and defines therefore an observer within its horizon of observation.
The fundamental movement defines a succession of imperceptible instants for the observer in the time flowing between two perceptible instants and thus defines the duration of the observers’ imperceptibility. During this imperceptible instant there is an acceleration of the fundamental movement between two successive flows of time. This acceleration is such that the observation becomes impossible. Thus, due to the doubling movement, time is stroboscopic: periodic "openings" of time windows (also called temporal openings) in its flow remain imperceptible for the observer of the space defined by this time flow. For this observer, the flow of time seems continuous but in fact, it contains imperceptible "openings" where this time flow is accelerated.
A particle – as defined by the fundamental doubling movement and called "doubling particle" – evolves simultaneously in the space of the observer and in the "temporal openings" of this space, as two complementary parts having the same identity but evolving in two different time flows.
An information exchange between the two parts of the doubled particle takes place through the imperceptible time openings. In other words, a particle in the time of the observer (tangential movement) always possesses the information of its doubling part that evolves in an accelerated time flow (radial movement). With this exchange (radial-tangential) and its reverse exchange (tangential-radial), both in an imperceptible time (opening of temporal window), the radial particle gives to the tangential particle the information of several spinbacks before the first tangential spinback. That corresponds to the definition of an anticipation between "time flow 1" (past) and "time flow 4" (present) or between "time flow 4" (present) and "time flow 7" (future). Thus, the fundamental movement provides an even more rapid anticipation between "time flow 1" and "time flow 7". Thereby, it is possible for the particle moving in "time flow 1" (past) to memorize a transformation of the particle moving in "time flow 7" (future) before even the particle moving in the intermediate "time flow 4" (present) begins to undertake this transformation. An exchange of information between the particle in "time flow 1" and the particle in "time flow 4" gives to the particle in "time flow 4" the possibility to memorize the potential of the particle in “time flow 7” before any action is taken in "time flow 4". Thus the observer in "time flow 4" (present) is able to memorize in "time flow 1" (past) a potential created in "time flow 7" (future) without ever having to experiment it. We can say that, within the present of the particle, its past is in fact the memory of a future which was not tested by itself: in other words, through the "temporal openings" the fundamental doubling movement gives to the particle the possibility of anticipating an action before undertaking it.
|
|
|
|
