Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Catholic Bishops' Fight Against HHS Mandate


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Catholic Bishops' Fight Against HHS Mandate Page: <<   < prev  10 11 [12] 13 14   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Catholic Bishops' Fight Against HHS Mandate - 3/20/2012 6:03:55 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Iamsemisweet
"logic" doesn't seem to enter in to the argument for you.
Not that it matters, but Sandra Fluke is not an employee of Georgetown, she is a consumer of their services. Those services are no doubt costing her a lot of money. As a customer, she has every right to complain about the level of services she is paying for.
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
Well, by that logic, if you don't like the insurance coverage your employer is offering, change jobs or buy gap coverage.
Sandra Fluke knew before going to Georgetown that they didn't cover BC. She went anyway. How is it she has any standing to demand they cover it? If she didn't like the rules of the insurance offered by Georgetown, she shouldn't have taken that coverage, or she should have bought her own.



<Laughing> The only time you truly get to complain about the services is if the services aren't amounting to the offer. No offer of service, and you get no service? What didn't you get about the non offer of service? What you are saying is that a consumer of a service has the right to petition government to force an increase in service. And for all those who get on my case that I'm always sex and birth control, does the government have the right to force McDonald's to offer tacos? Does Government have the right to force Metallica to play opera in the classic opera style? Does government have the right to force Boise State to re-carpet their football stadium green (it would be so much easier on the eyes)? Does Government have the right to force UPS to use Blue uniforms instead of brown? No. Government doesn't have that right.

She knew going in that Georgetown didn't offer BC coverage. She knew the level of service prior to applying. She chose to go there anyway. A consumer can piss and moan about service levels as much as he/she wants. If consumers continue to purchase that service, at that level, what tells the service-provider they need to change? Nothing.


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to Iamsemisweet)
Profile   Post #: 221
RE: Catholic Bishops' Fight Against HHS Mandate - 3/20/2012 6:04:05 AM   
thishereboi


Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam


quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi


quote:

ORIGINAL: GotSteel

quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead
The simple answer to that one is "No, of course not."
Anybody who thinks otherwise is making an argument for special privileges. WTF is there any debate about?


Christians are used to getting special privileges, pointing out the inequality isn't going to phase a group that expects things to be that way.




What special privileges are they used to getting?

Not paying taxes or one.


You mean all these years I have been paying taxes and I didn't have to? Damn, I want my money back.

_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert


This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi


(in reply to Hillwilliam)
Profile   Post #: 222
RE: Catholic Bishops' Fight Against HHS Mandate - 3/20/2012 6:06:38 AM   
SpiritedRadiance


Posts: 1341
Joined: 3/3/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

You did use it. You used to gain access to the negotiated pricing. You can't question why you can't use what you've paid in for whatever you want and then claim that without the insurance you would not have access to the pricing. That's what your premiums, in part, get you.



Yes but my birth control or anyones birth control regardless shouldnt be excluded just because its birthcontrol.. I cant say im morally against fat people and they cant have any drugs related to them being fat and not cover it. I cant say im against all forms of self induce cancer and wont pay for it.

However im being told because im a whore and slut I cant have something i medically need to live and if i want it i have to pay 5 times the price to get it because my company has a moral issue with it...


quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

I'm not just against Government forcing Churches to offer something against it's moral tenets.


The Second the church got its self into business is the second it lost its abilities to make decisions on moral tenets. Its no longer a church is a business, and sorry business are required by law to not discriminate against its employees. Not covering birth control or any female based services when they provide male counter parts is discrimination..

If you do not wish to be forced to do something you believe is morally wrong, then keep to just having a church, You dont need to open hospitals, Or anything else.


I also find it funny one of the largest catholic based health providers in the US (CHI) Doesnt mind covering birth control, or abortions for its employees as of Jan 1 2010...In fact the CEO Kevin Laufler (at least of the billing department side) Said " I prefer to have it covered because i understand we employe people of all faiths, and i would hate for anyone to feel like they were morally wrong because they have a different belief system. I dont believe we should condom others, Least we start to be judged in return"


And this was said in person to me and my family when he came for a visit in April 10



_____________________________

"Theres nothing in life like the feeling of cool leather sliding over your skin, the tears that fill your eyes as you realize someone else thinks you deserve it even if you havent reached that conclusion yet"- Forever to remember 11/5/11

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 223
RE: Catholic Bishops' Fight Against HHS Mandate - 3/20/2012 6:43:38 AM   
farglebargle


Posts: 10715
Joined: 6/15/2005
From: Albany, NY
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Iamsemisweet

"logic" doesn't seem to enter in to the argument for you.

Not that it matters, but Sandra Fluke is not an employee of Georgetown, she is a consumer of their services. Those services are no doubt costing her a lot of money. As a customer, she has every right to complain about the level of services she is paying for.
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri


Well, by that logic, if you don't like the insurance coverage your employer is offering, change jobs or buy gap coverage.

Sandra Fluke knew before going to Georgetown that they didn't cover BC. She went anyway. How is it she has any standing to demand they cover it? If she didn't like the rules of the insurance offered by Georgetown, she shouldn't have taken that coverage, or she should have bought her own.



SANDRA FLUKE PURCHASES HEALTH INSURANCE FOR THOSE SERVICES. Go read their student handbook. Insurance in mandatory.


SANDRA FLUKE PURCHASES HEALTH INSURANCE FOR THOSE SERVICES. Go read their student handbook. Insurance in mandatory.


SANDRA FLUKE PURCHASES HEALTH INSURANCE FOR THOSE SERVICES. Go read their student handbook. Insurance in mandatory.


SANDRA FLUKE PURCHASES HEALTH INSURANCE FOR THOSE SERVICES. Go read their student handbook. Insurance in mandatory.


SANDRA FLUKE PURCHASES HEALTH INSURANCE FOR THOSE SERVICES. Go read their student handbook. Insurance in mandatory.


SANDRA FLUKE PURCHASES HEALTH INSURANCE FOR THOSE SERVICES. Go read their student handbook. Insurance in mandatory.


SANDRA FLUKE PURCHASES HEALTH INSURANCE FOR THOSE SERVICES. Go read their student handbook. Insurance in mandatory.



_____________________________

It's not every generation that gets to watch a civilization fall. Looks like we're in for a hell of a show.

ברוך אתה, אדוני אלוקינו, ריבון העולמים, מי יוצר צמחים ריחניים

(in reply to Iamsemisweet)
Profile   Post #: 224
RE: Catholic Bishops' Fight Against HHS Mandate - 3/20/2012 6:45:34 AM   
farglebargle


Posts: 10715
Joined: 6/15/2005
From: Albany, NY
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

I don't have a problem with the Catholic Church choosing to cover BC.



THE CATHOLIC CHURCH DOES NOT COVER THE INSURED'S BENEFITS!

THE CATHOLIC CHURCH DOES NOT COVER THE INSURED'S BENEFITS!

THE CATHOLIC CHURCH DOES NOT COVER THE INSURED'S BENEFITS!

THE CATHOLIC CHURCH DOES NOT COVER THE INSURED'S BENEFITS!

THE CATHOLIC CHURCH DOES NOT COVER THE INSURED'S BENEFITS!

THE CATHOLIC CHURCH DOES NOT COVER THE INSURED'S BENEFITS!




_____________________________

It's not every generation that gets to watch a civilization fall. Looks like we're in for a hell of a show.

ברוך אתה, אדוני אלוקינו, ריבון העולמים, מי יוצר צמחים ריחניים

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 225
RE: Catholic Bishops' Fight Against HHS Mandate - 3/20/2012 6:47:46 AM   
farglebargle


Posts: 10715
Joined: 6/15/2005
From: Albany, NY
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

Government doesn't have the authority to dictate the private negotiations between a business and an insurer, though.


THE ENTIRE INSURANCE INDUSTRY'S EXISTENCE IS PREDICATED ON GOVERNMENT REGULATION.

THE ENTIRE INSURANCE INDUSTRY'S EXISTENCE IS PREDICATED ON GOVERNMENT REGULATION.

THE ENTIRE INSURANCE INDUSTRY'S EXISTENCE IS PREDICATED ON GOVERNMENT REGULATION.

THE ENTIRE INSURANCE INDUSTRY'S EXISTENCE IS PREDICATED ON GOVERNMENT REGULATION.

THE ENTIRE INSURANCE INDUSTRY'S EXISTENCE IS PREDICATED ON GOVERNMENT REGULATION.

THE ENTIRE INSURANCE INDUSTRY'S EXISTENCE IS PREDICATED ON GOVERNMENT REGULATION.

THE ENTIRE INSURANCE INDUSTRY'S EXISTENCE IS PREDICATED ON GOVERNMENT REGULATION.

THE ENTIRE INSURANCE INDUSTRY'S EXISTENCE IS PREDICATED ON GOVERNMENT REGULATION.

_____________________________

It's not every generation that gets to watch a civilization fall. Looks like we're in for a hell of a show.

ברוך אתה, אדוני אלוקינו, ריבון העולמים, מי יוצר צמחים ריחניים

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 226
RE: Catholic Bishops' Fight Against HHS Mandate - 3/20/2012 6:49:57 AM   
farglebargle


Posts: 10715
Joined: 6/15/2005
From: Albany, NY
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle
quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr
quote:

ORIGINAL: dcnovice
quote:

Paychecks are an exchange. The employee works (hopefully) and the employer pays them (hopefully, well).
Insurance, vacations, company cars, etc. used to be called "percs". They're little "gimmes" thrown in to sweeten the pot (presumably to lure the best of the best to that company).

I've had the good fortune to score some nice perks over the years: two trips to New Zealand, a stint at adventure school, an interview with the guy who found the Titanic, a lovely afternoon with Jane Goodall, a staring contest with a lion (he won), the chance to feed an anteater. Also some nice offices and access to a fine library. No car, though. I'm very grateful for the cool perks that my work life has thrown my way.
Not for a minute, though, would I count my health insurance among them. Perhaps I'm one of those "professional victim" employees, but I have always considered my insurance to be part of my compensation--and my employers have always framed it that way, taking pains to point out that my total compensation comprised far more than my paycheck.
To my "entitled" mindset, compensation ceases to be the employer's money once it's paid to a worker or to a third party on behalf of that employee. So it's really not the church's money that's being used to fund contraception or blood transfusions or what-have-you.

But, DC, once again: it isn't the money. It's asking the church to be a "middle man". It is only through the existence of the job, created by the church that the employees get group health rates.
That access ... that "middle man service" means their hands are "dirty" also (in their mind). My guns analogy was pretty dead on. Surely, you wouldn't want to help me do something that you felt was a blight to mankind?
Peace and comfort,
Michael


Anything can be INDIRECTLY related to anything else.
They're only "middlemen" if you're a damned COMMUNIST, and don't believe that the EMPLOYEE or INSURER'S money is in fact, theirs. We do not hold our bank accounts COLLECTIVELY. So, only in your socialist dreams is there any connection.
Once the church writes 'PAY TO THE ORDER OF" on a paycheck, IT'S NOT THEIR MONEY ANYMORE!


You are absolutely correct. As soon as the Church pays the employee, it's the employee's money. However, since the insurance negotiations occur prior to giving them to the employee, the coverage negotiations are not the employee's. Let's say the insurance coverage is cash money. The Church negotiates this cash money with the insurer. Until that cash money is paid to the employee, it isn't the employee's. If the Church is negotiating the inclusion of BC into that pile o' cash money, isn't it acting as a conduit for you? That answer is, yes, yes it is.



There is no 'negotiation' between the employer and insurer. The employees will get only what the insurer offers. The employer doesn't do anything but pass folders back and forth.

THE INSURANCE CONTRACT IS BETWEEN THE INSURED AND INSURER. THE EMPLOYER IS NOT A PARTY TO THE CONTRACT.

THE INSURANCE CONTRACT IS BETWEEN THE INSURED AND INSURER. THE EMPLOYER IS NOT A PARTY TO THE CONTRACT.

THE INSURANCE CONTRACT IS BETWEEN THE INSURED AND INSURER. THE EMPLOYER IS NOT A PARTY TO THE CONTRACT.

THE INSURANCE CONTRACT IS BETWEEN THE INSURED AND INSURER. THE EMPLOYER IS NOT A PARTY TO THE CONTRACT.

THE INSURANCE CONTRACT IS BETWEEN THE INSURED AND INSURER. THE EMPLOYER IS NOT A PARTY TO THE CONTRACT.

THE INSURANCE CONTRACT IS BETWEEN THE INSURED AND INSURER. THE EMPLOYER IS NOT A PARTY TO THE CONTRACT.

THE INSURANCE CONTRACT IS BETWEEN THE INSURED AND INSURER. THE EMPLOYER IS NOT A PARTY TO THE CONTRACT.

_____________________________

It's not every generation that gets to watch a civilization fall. Looks like we're in for a hell of a show.

ברוך אתה, אדוני אלוקינו, ריבון העולמים, מי יוצר צמחים ריחניים

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 227
RE: Catholic Bishops' Fight Against HHS Mandate - 3/20/2012 7:18:57 AM   
Hillwilliam


Posts: 19394
Joined: 8/27/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: GotSteel


quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam
Catholics don't like Birth Control.


The worst part is that this isn't even true. Catholic women overwhelmingly use birth control.

quote:

ORIGINAL: http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/Religion-and-Contraceptive-Use.pdf
Among all women who have had sex, 99% have
ever used a contraceptive method other than natural
family planning. This figure is virtually the same,
98%, among sexually experienced Catholic women.


Catholics even come out on the side of health care paying for it.

quote:

ORIGINAL: http://publicreligion.org/research/2012/02/january-tracking-poll-2012/
Roughly 6-in-10 Catholics (58%) believe that employers should be required to provide their employees with health care plans that cover contraception.
Among Catholic voters, support for this requirement is slightly lower at 52%.
Only half (50%) of white Catholics support this requirement, compared to 47% who oppose it.



I should have said "THE CHURCH" doesn't like birth control.

All better now?

_____________________________

Kinkier than a cheap garden hose.

Whoever said "Religion is the opiate of the masses" never heard Right Wing talk radio.

Don't blame me, I voted for Gary Johnson.

(in reply to GotSteel)
Profile   Post #: 228
RE: Catholic Bishops' Fight Against HHS Mandate - 3/20/2012 9:28:14 AM   
GotSteel


Posts: 5871
Joined: 2/19/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Iamsemisweet

"logic" doesn't seem to enter in to the argument for you.

Not that it matters, but Sandra Fluke is not an employee of Georgetown, she is a consumer of their services. Those services are no doubt costing her a lot of money. As a customer, she has every right to complain about the level of services she is paying for.


Yep, I'd say there was something wrong with her if she didn't complain that her friend shouldn't have had to loose an ovary for Jesus.

(in reply to Iamsemisweet)
Profile   Post #: 229
RE: Catholic Bishops' Fight Against HHS Mandate - 3/20/2012 9:33:11 AM   
GotSteel


Posts: 5871
Joined: 2/19/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi
You mean all these years I have been paying taxes and I didn't have to? Damn, I want my money back.



Do the special exceptions to laws given to religious businesses mean that atheists can open a brothel? Inquiring Pastafarians want to know!

(in reply to thishereboi)
Profile   Post #: 230
RE: Catholic Bishops' Fight Against HHS Mandate - 3/20/2012 9:37:48 AM   
DaddySatyr


Posts: 9381
Joined: 8/29/2011
From: Pittston, Pennsyltucky
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: GotSteel


quote:

ORIGINAL: Iamsemisweet

"logic" doesn't seem to enter in to the argument for you.

Not that it matters, but Sandra Fluke is not an employee of Georgetown, she is a consumer of their services. Those services are no doubt costing her a lot of money. As a customer, she has every right to complain about the level of services she is paying for.


Yep, I'd say there was something wrong with her if she didn't complain that her friend shouldn't have had to loose an ovary for Jesus.


The issue here is that the insurance company denied the claim of something that was covered under the policy. Georgetown wasn't the problem in that case. The young lady that is the friend of that palin, Fluke, lost her ovary to corporate greed.

If you read the testimony (not the snippet that's being circulated around), Fluke says that Georgetown's policy covered the pills for that purpose but that the insurance company denied the claim. Go piss on Prudential's head.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sandra Fluke

For my friend, and 20% of women in her situation, she never got the insurance company to cover her prescription, despite verification of her illness from her doctor. Her claim was denied repeatedly on the assumption that she really wanted the birth control to prevent pregnancy. She’s gay, so clearly polycystic ovarian syndrome was a much more urgent concern than accidental pregnancy. After months of paying over $100 out of pocket, she just couldn’t afford her medication anymore and had to stop taking it.





Peace and comfort,



Michael.


< Message edited by DaddySatyr -- 3/20/2012 9:58:52 AM >


_____________________________

A Stone in My Shoe

Screen captures (and pissing on shadows) still RULE! Ya feel me?

"For that which I love, I will do horrible things"

(in reply to GotSteel)
Profile   Post #: 231
RE: Catholic Bishops' Fight Against HHS Mandate - 3/20/2012 9:53:32 AM   
GotSteel


Posts: 5871
Joined: 2/19/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam
I should have said "THE CHURCH" doesn't like birth control.

All better now?


Lol I just couldn't help taking the opportunity to point out how wildly unpopular this is among the non silly-hat-wearing-virgin demographics.

(in reply to Hillwilliam)
Profile   Post #: 232
RE: Catholic Bishops' Fight Against HHS Mandate - 3/20/2012 10:55:50 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SpiritedRadiance
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
You did use it. You used to gain access to the negotiated pricing. You can't question why you can't use what you've paid in for whatever you want and then claim that without the insurance you would not have access to the pricing. That's what your premiums, in part, get you.

Yes but my birth control or anyones birth control regardless shouldnt be excluded just because its birthcontrol.. I cant say im morally against fat people and they cant have any drugs related to them being fat and not cover it. I cant say im against all forms of self induce cancer and wont pay for it.
However im being told because im a whore and slut I cant have something i medically need to live and if i want it i have to pay 5 times the price to get it because my company has a moral issue with it...


Who called you a whore (isn't the term "slut" a positive term in our lifestyle?!? I mean, a "pain slut" isn't derogatory, is it?)? Oh,. wait, you're talking about Rush calling Sandra Fluke a whore and slut because she wants her birth control covered so it is used as birth control, not a medically necessary medication (as it is in your case). I must have missed how that's apples to apples.

quote:

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
I'm not just against Government forcing Churches to offer something against it's moral tenets.

The Second the church got its self into business is the second it lost its abilities to make decisions on moral tenets. Its no longer a church is a business, and sorry business are required by law to not discriminate against its employees. Not covering birth control or any female based services when they provide male counter parts is discrimination..


So, churches cover condoms?

quote:


If you do not wish to be forced to do something you believe is morally wrong, then keep to just having a church, You dont need to open hospitals, Or anything else.
I also find it funny one of the largest catholic based health providers in the US (CHI) Doesnt mind covering birth control, or abortions for its employees as of Jan 1 2010...In fact the CEO Kevin Laufler (at least of the billing department side) Said " I prefer to have it covered because i understand we employe people of all faiths, and i would hate for anyone to feel like they were morally wrong because they have a different belief system. I dont believe we should condom others, Least we start to be judged in return"
And this was said in person to me and my family when he came for a visit in April 10


Good for him. And, did you not read the part about my being perfectly okay with a Church choosing to cover BC for it's employees? Did you? Do you not see how this example fits perfectly within that? Kevin Laufler made the choice to cover the medication. He didn't say that government forced him to offer coverage. He chose it. There is a massive difference between choosing it on your own and being forced to do something.

As an example of that, I fully believe that using seat belts in a vehicle is a safer practice than not wearing a seat belt. However, I don't believe the Fed's or any other level of Government has the authority to threaten people if they don't wear a seat belt (motorcycle helmet laws fall into the exact same category). It isn't that it's a stupid thing to do. It's that they don't have the authority. Just for the record, I have worn a seat belt in the front seat of vehicles since I was a runt, which was well before Ohio passed their seat belt laws. I saw no difference because of the law. Doesn't make it right, though.




_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to SpiritedRadiance)
Profile   Post #: 233
RE: Catholic Bishops' Fight Against HHS Mandate - 3/20/2012 10:58:37 AM   
Hillwilliam


Posts: 19394
Joined: 8/27/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi


You mean all these years I have been paying taxes and I didn't have to? Damn, I want my money back.

Only if you can claim to be a religion. Maybe you should be one of those Dommes that demand 'worship'. Could they get a tax exemption as a religion?

_____________________________

Kinkier than a cheap garden hose.

Whoever said "Religion is the opiate of the masses" never heard Right Wing talk radio.

Don't blame me, I voted for Gary Johnson.

(in reply to thishereboi)
Profile   Post #: 234
RE: Catholic Bishops' Fight Against HHS Mandate - 3/20/2012 10:59:31 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
Government doesn't have the authority to dictate the private negotiations between a business and an insurer, though.

THE ENTIRE INSURANCE INDUSTRY'S EXISTENCE IS PREDICATED ON GOVERNMENT REGULATION.


Just for the record, I acknowledge you have mad copy/paste skillz. So, are you saying that de-regulating would cause the existence of insurance to disappear? I mean, if that's the case, I can't see a greater argument for deregulation.

insurance to disappear? I mean, if that's the case, I can't see a greater argument for deregulation.
Just for the record, I acknowledge you have mad copy/paste skillz. So, are you saying that de-regulating would cause the existence of

Dammit. I need to practice some more so I don't screw up my copy/paste. You are my copy/paste hero. I aspire to one-day be as good at copying and pasting as you, C/P master fraglebargle.

_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to farglebargle)
Profile   Post #: 235
RE: Catholic Bishops' Fight Against HHS Mandate - 3/20/2012 11:03:10 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: GotSteel
quote:

ORIGINAL: Iamsemisweet
"logic" doesn't seem to enter in to the argument for you.
Not that it matters, but Sandra Fluke is not an employee of Georgetown, she is a consumer of their services. Those services are no doubt costing her a lot of money. As a customer, she has every right to complain about the level of services she is paying for.

Yep, I'd say there was something wrong with her if she didn't complain that her friend shouldn't have had to loose an ovary for Jesus.


Aha, but, that's not the whole point, either, and you know it. Sandra Fluke isn't arguing that Georgetown should cover BC for prevention of medical issues. She's arguing that Georgetown should cover BC, period.

Therein lies the problem.

_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to GotSteel)
Profile   Post #: 236
RE: Catholic Bishops' Fight Against HHS Mandate - 3/20/2012 11:18:18 AM   
farglebargle


Posts: 10715
Joined: 6/15/2005
From: Albany, NY
Status: offline

quote:

She's arguing that Georgetown should cover BC, period.


STOP FUCKING LYING! Repeat after me.

SANDRA FLUKE WANTS HER INSURER TO COVER BC, PERIOD.

SANDRA FLUKE WANTS HER INSURER TO COVER BC, PERIOD.

SANDRA FLUKE WANTS HER INSURER TO COVER BC, PERIOD.

SANDRA FLUKE WANTS HER INSURER TO COVER BC, PERIOD.

SANDRA FLUKE WANTS HER INSURER TO COVER BC, PERIOD.

SANDRA FLUKE WANTS HER INSURER TO COVER BC, PERIOD.

SANDRA FLUKE WANTS HER INSURER TO COVER BC, PERIOD.

SANDRA FLUKE WANTS HER INSURER TO COVER BC, PERIOD.

SANDRA FLUKE WANTS HER INSURER TO COVER BC, PERIOD.

SANDRA FLUKE WANTS HER INSURER TO COVER BC, PERIOD.

SANDRA FLUKE WANTS HER INSURER TO COVER BC, PERIOD.



< Message edited by farglebargle -- 3/20/2012 11:19:23 AM >


_____________________________

It's not every generation that gets to watch a civilization fall. Looks like we're in for a hell of a show.

ברוך אתה, אדוני אלוקינו, ריבון העולמים, מי יוצר צמחים ריחניים

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 237
RE: Catholic Bishops' Fight Against HHS Mandate - 3/20/2012 11:22:18 AM   
thishereboi


Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: GotSteel

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi
You mean all these years I have been paying taxes and I didn't have to? Damn, I want my money back.



Do the special exceptions to laws given to religious businesses mean that atheists can open a brothel? Inquiring Pastafarians want to know!


What does that have to do with christians getting special privileges?

_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert


This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi


(in reply to GotSteel)
Profile   Post #: 238
RE: Catholic Bishops' Fight Against HHS Mandate - 3/20/2012 11:24:06 AM   
thishereboi


Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam


quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi


You mean all these years I have been paying taxes and I didn't have to? Damn, I want my money back.

Only if you can claim to be a religion. Maybe you should be one of those Dommes that demand 'worship'. Could they get a tax exemption as a religion?



He didn't say religions, he said christians.

_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert


This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi


(in reply to Hillwilliam)
Profile   Post #: 239
RE: Catholic Bishops' Fight Against HHS Mandate - 3/20/2012 12:21:35 PM   
Hillwilliam


Posts: 19394
Joined: 8/27/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi


quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam


quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi


You mean all these years I have been paying taxes and I didn't have to? Damn, I want my money back.

Only if you can claim to be a religion. Maybe you should be one of those Dommes that demand 'worship'. Could they get a tax exemption as a religion?



He didn't say religions, he said christians.

True but I was talking about religions in general.

_____________________________

Kinkier than a cheap garden hose.

Whoever said "Religion is the opiate of the masses" never heard Right Wing talk radio.

Don't blame me, I voted for Gary Johnson.

(in reply to thishereboi)
Profile   Post #: 240
Page:   <<   < prev  10 11 [12] 13 14   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Catholic Bishops' Fight Against HHS Mandate Page: <<   < prev  10 11 [12] 13 14   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.111