RE: Conservative christian values now include rape? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


tazzygirl -> RE: Conservative christian values now include rape? (3/18/2012 12:41:55 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

quote:

Now, quit your pouting and grab a juice box.


aww, isn't that cute. Implying I am a child without actually saying it to slide by the moderators. You are a charmer aren't you.

But go ahead and ignore the title of the thread "Conservative christian values now include rape?" I am sure you weren't trying to imply anything with that either. [8|]


Why do you think there was a question mark there... or did that pass your notice?  The question mark is there because I do not believe it IS part of christian values.  Yet here we have a man claiming that is what he stands for, committing that very crime, and it seems to be well documented.

As far as the child comment.... your avatar is one of a child, and you are definitely throwing a temper tantrum over something that was never suggested.  The shoe fits.




xssve -> RE: Conservative christian values now include rape? (3/18/2012 12:45:51 PM)

And since you're a professed lesbian, we're gonna have to think about stoning you - 'cept I think you're already stoned.

On glue, if I'm any judge of it. [:D]




sirsholly -> RE: Conservative christian values now include rape? (3/18/2012 1:18:54 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

Because its "popular" to run on "christian values". As I have said before.... many people use religion to advance their own agendas. That isnt a religious person.. that isnt a christian person.

Religion makes you a Christian about as much as a garage makes you an automobile.




tazzygirl -> RE: Conservative christian values now include rape? (3/18/2012 1:56:24 PM)

So very true Holly... Nice to see you posting again!




tweakabelle -> RE: Conservative christian values now include rape? (3/18/2012 5:47:00 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Raiikun


quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

So the argument can be made that rape is an age old Biblically-mandated and -approved tradition. After all conservative christians are the ones who insist that the Bible is God's word to be taken literally and obeyed scrupulously in every respect. If the above is taken literally, rape can be seen as a Biblical form of courtship.

Charming isn't it?


Not at all. Not that I'm trying to defend societal practices of that age, but that was considered quite a punishment, and the intent was because the man had violated her and made her "undesirable", it became his responsibility to pay restitution and take care of her.

I'm certainly glad we've evolved since then, but that passage certainly wasn't in support of rape.

Wow! Such amazing sophistry. Rewarding a rapist by marriage to his victim for a mere 50 pieces of silver is a "punishment"? Of oucrse the girl's wishes are irrelevant. Words mean what they mean unless I say otherwise, is this what you are arguing?

Two things: There's a page full of other pro-rape quotes, including quotes where God orders rapes in the Bible at the link above. Explain all of them away. Here's one to get you started:
(Deuteronomy 20:10-14)

As you approach a town to attack it, first offer its people terms for peace. If they accept your terms and open the gates to you, then all the people inside will serve you in forced labor. But if they refuse to make peace and prepare to fight, you must attack the town. When the LORD your God hands it over to you, kill every man in the town. But you may keep for yourselves all the women, children, livestock, and other plunder. You may enjoy the spoils of your enemies that the LORD your God has given you.



And if you are going to apply the "that was them this is now" argument, apply it consistently, especially to areas like sexual morality, gay sex etc

Or is the capacity to take the Bible seriously wholly dependent on selective interpretation?




Arturas -> RE: Conservative christian values now include rape? (3/18/2012 7:57:15 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

quote:

While I do realize this isnt the only representative of the christian conservative movement, there is such a disconnect here between their "values" and the truth.


You mean the truth as in this guy doesn't represent any group and is a responsible for his own actions? Because that's the truth. But go ahead and try to explain why one mans actions should reflect on anyone but that one man. Moon has already started with the "well someone else does it to" so maybe you can come up with something more imaginative.


Perhaps the disconnect can be traced back to the Bible.

The Bible has quite a few less-than-exemplary mentions of rape. Here's one:

4) Laws of Rape (Deuteronomy 22:28-29 NLT)

If a man is caught in the act of raping a young woman who is not engaged, he must pay fifty pieces of silver to her father. Then he must marry the young woman because he violated her, and he will never be allowed to divorce her.


There are an awful lot more. This particular mention is far from the worst. They are all conveniently listed here.

So the argument can be made that rape is an age old Biblically-mandated and -approved tradition. After all conservative christians are the ones who insist that the Bible is God's word to be taken literally and obeyed scrupulously in every respect. If the above is taken literally, rape can be seen as a Biblical form of courtship.

Charming isn't it?



I don't follow that reasoning. Here is what is really happening: One does not have sex with anyone but their wife according to the Bible. Also in that culture, a woman was ruined and never would have a husband if raped. Therefore, the Bible protects her and makes you, the rapist, responsible for her, to her father and for her future welfare. The world was a difficut place in those times and she might have starved in the worse situation and for sure forever husbandless and childless and alone if this was not done. So, how can that be seen as "a Biblical form of courtship"?




Arturas -> RE: Conservative christian values now include rape? (3/18/2012 8:20:03 PM)

quote:

Two things: There's a page full of other pro-rape quotes, including quotes where God orders rapes in the Bible at the link above. Explain all of them away. Here's one to get you started:
(Deuteronomy 20:10-14)

As you approach a town to attack it, first offer its people terms for peace. If they accept your terms and open the gates to you, then all the people inside will serve you in forced labor. But if they refuse to make peace and prepare to fight, you must attack the town. When the LORD your God hands it over to you, kill every man in the town. But you may keep for yourselves all the women, children, livestock, and other plunder. You may enjoy the spoils of your enemies that the LORD your God has given you.


And if you are going to apply the "that was them this is now" argument, apply it consistently, especially to areas like sexual morality, gay sex etc

Or is the capacity to take the Bible seriously wholly dependent on selective interpretation?



I fully understand how you can pull a verse or two out of the Bible and then easily deplict it how you have well done. However, it is one of many verses on the subject of making war in ancient times against a ruthless enemy. The Lord God is teaching a people, a whole nation who once were slaves for hundreds of years, how to deal with ruthless enemies they will encounter. When at war in ancient times this is how you must treat the enemy. Nothing more. Nothing less.

There are similar passenges in the Koran. They address a specific time and situation. What do you say to that?

"And slay them wherever ye find them, and drive them out of the places whence they drove you out, for persecution is worse than slaughter. And fight not with them at the Inviolable Place of Worship until they first attack you there, but if they attack you (there) then slay them. Such is the reward of disbelievers." - Qur'an 2:191



Finally, let me leave you with some balance; Here the Bible addresses enemies in general in contrast to that the Jews faced in the time of your verse, it does so in the time of Christ:

Luke 6:Love for Enemies
27"But I tell you who hear me: Love your enemies, do good to those who hate you, 28bless those who curse you, pray for those who mistreat you. 29If someone strikes you on one cheek, turn to him the other also. If someone takes your cloak, do not stop him from taking your tunic. 30Give to everyone who asks you, and if anyone takes what belongs to you, do not demand it back. 31Do to others as you would have them do to you.





PeonForHer -> RE: Conservative christian values now include rape? (3/18/2012 8:54:44 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Arturas
Therefore, the Bible protects her and makes you, the rapist, responsible for her, to her father and for her future welfare.


How does paying her father fifty pieces of silver have any bearing on 'protecting' the woman who's been raped? It's so clear that crystal is as mud in a whirlpool by comparison: With his daughter having been raped, the father's 'property' has been devalued. That section of the Bible is pure ugliness.






tweakabelle -> RE: Conservative christian values now include rape? (3/18/2012 11:50:02 PM)

quote:

I fully understand how you can pull a verse or two out of the Bible and then easily deplict it how you have well done. However, it is one of many verses on the subject of making war in ancient times against a ruthless enemy. The Lord God is teaching a people, a whole nation who once were slaves for hundreds of years, how to deal with ruthless enemies they will encounter. When at war in ancient times this is how you must treat the enemy. Nothing more. Nothing less.

Is the Bible the Word of God according to your beliefs? Or is it a cute historical document of limited relevance?

The relevant quote encourages the Jews to attack their neighbours, sack their cities kill the menfolk and rape the women. It is one of a number of similar verses to be found in the Bible. If this is the word of God, surely it is eternal, not some fashionable sentiment tailored for the Bronze Age.,

Alternatively if the Old Testament is is superseded by the New, then why is so much affirmation granted to Deuteronomy's remarks about sexual behaviour? Why is the Bible right one minute and to be ignored the next? Who decides these things? Where does God give them the right to make such decisions? Is the right to cherry pick granted to believers in the Bible? Chapter and verse please? And if believers don't have the right to cherry pick the word of God, isn't all that selective interpretation tantamount to blasphemy according to your belief system?

Quite clearly, believers are seeking to establish for themselves a right to dismiss any part of the Bible that they may choose or prefer not to defend today, while retaining those parts that happen to suit their personal belief system, neuroses or phobias (or suppressed lusts and desires). So we are advised to dismiss the bits of the OT relating to rape or slavery (because they are under any circumstances indefensible) but we retain those sections that relate to say, homosexuality, because that suits a given believer's personal phobias and neuroses (or suppressed lusts and desires).

You are free to find such an approach intellectually and spiritually persuasive. Please don't assume that I am persuaded by such obvious intellectual gymnastics (to use as gracious a term as I can find for it). To me, it is transparent rationalisaton and classical cognitive dissonance.

If some parts of the OT no longer apply because they are time and place specific as per your argument, then they are irrelevant. Surely by precisely the same logic, the entire OT is irrelevant. You can't have it both ways.


quote:

There are similar passenges in the Koran. They address a specific time and situation. What do you say to that?


Precisely the same as I say to such passages in the Bible. Why on earth would I regard them any differently?






Arturas -> RE: Conservative christian values now include rape? (3/19/2012 12:05:59 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer


quote:

ORIGINAL: Arturas
Therefore, the Bible protects her and makes you, the rapist, responsible for her, to her father and for her future welfare.


How does paying her father fifty pieces of silver have any bearing on 'protecting' the woman who's been raped? It's so clear that crystal is as mud in a whirlpool by comparison: With his daughter having been raped, the father's 'property' has been devalued. That section of the Bible is pure ugliness.





Much of the Bible in this section makes up ancient law. Protecting the woman is done by having her married. The fifty pieces of silver is a large sum and penalizes the rapist and compensates the father for the loss of his daughter.

As far as being ugly, there are even more ugly parts since they deal not with the mistakes of Heaven but mistakes of man. The world was ugly then and is ugly now and the Bible deals with matters very ugly then and now.




tweakabelle -> RE: Conservative christian values now include rape? (3/19/2012 12:10:15 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer


quote:

ORIGINAL: Arturas
Therefore, the Bible protects her and makes you, the rapist, responsible for her, to her father and for her future welfare.


How does paying her father fifty pieces of silver have any bearing on 'protecting' the woman who's been raped? It's so clear that crystal is as mud in a whirlpool by comparison: With his daughter having been raped, the father's 'property' has been devalued. That section of the Bible is pure ugliness.


The rapist is the only person in the scenario who comes out ahead. On what basis are we to consider this piece of vicious misogyny to be anti-rape or "protective" of women?

The poor woman is a thing to be used, abused, then exchanged in a tawdry bit of commerce designed only to restore the 'rights' of the owner, and to reward the rapist with the object of his lust while condemning the woman to a lifetime of enslavement to her rapist. That the woman is a human being doesn't even enter the equation at any point.

I admire your restraint in describing it as merely "pure ugliness". To me it is a lot more than merely aesthetically outrageous.




Arturas -> RE: Conservative christian values now include rape? (3/19/2012 12:50:34 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

quote:

I fully understand how you can pull a verse or two out of the Bible and then easily deplict it how you have well done. However, it is one of many verses on the subject of making war in ancient times against a ruthless enemy. The Lord God is teaching a people, a whole nation who once were slaves for hundreds of years, how to deal with ruthless enemies they will encounter. When at war in ancient times this is how you must treat the enemy. Nothing more. Nothing less.

Is the Bible the Word of God according to your beliefs? Or is it a cute historical document of limited relevance?

The relevant quote encourages the Jews to attack their neighbours, sack their cities kill the menfolk and rape the women. It is one of a number of similar verses to be found in the Bible. If this is the word of God, surely it is eternal, not some fashionable sentiment tailored for the Bronze Age.,

Alternatively if the Old Testament is is superseded by the New, then why is so much affirmation granted to Deuteronomy's remarks about sexual behaviour? Why is the Bible right one minute and to be ignored the next? Who decides these things? Where does God give them the right to make such decisions? Is the right to cherry pick granted to believers in the Bible? Chapter and verse please? And if believers don't have the right to cherry pick the word of God, isn't all that selective interpretation tantamount to blasphemy according to your belief system?

Quite clearly, believers are seeking to establish for themselves a right to dismiss any part of the Bible that they may choose or prefer not to defend today, while retaining those parts that happen to suit their personal belief system, neuroses or phobias (or suppressed lusts and desires). So we are advised to dismiss the bits of the OT relating to rape or slavery (because they are under any circumstances indefensible) but we retain those sections that relate to say, homosexuality, because that suits a given believer's personal phobias and neuroses (or suppressed lusts and desires).

You are free to find such an approach intellectually and spiritually persuasive. Please don't assume that I am persuaded by such obvious intellectual gymnastics (to use as gracious a term as I can find for it). To me, it is transparent rationalisaton and classical cognitive dissonance.

If some parts of the OT no longer apply because they are time and place specific as per your argument, then they are irrelevant. Surely by precisely the same logic, the entire OT is irrelevant. You can't have it both ways.


quote:

There are similar passenges in the Koran. They address a specific time and situation. What do you say to that?


Precisely the same as I say to such passages in the Bible. Why on earth would I regard them any differently?






Who am I, how could I be worthy enough to defend the Word of the Most High God in either book and when does God need me to defend Him? Such is not my place. I can however teach you what you do not know.

First, all of the Bible has relevance.

Second, the section you refer to is one of history and one of Laws given the Jews right before they took possession of the Promised land. The promised land were held and defended by "evil", enemies of the Lord and of the Jews. One treats "Evil" harshly if it does not surrender to "Good" and serve the Lord. This is the verse and the section you focused in on.

So, the lesson here is not to rape your enemy, and I don't see the phrase "rape thine enemy" btw, it is instead part of the larger lesson of how a people journey from captivity (as one does in their life), disobeyed their Lord (as one does in their life) and wandered in the wilderness until all their disobedience dies out and then when they learned obedience to the Word, they were led finally to the Promised Land (all as one does in their life).

All of these lessons, all this history, parallels your journey and mine and all others who find themselves in a darkness of captivity to something that rules their life, they wander in a great wilderness of unhappiness (divorce, drug addition, addition to CM forums, whatever) and then after hitting rock bottom they are finally obedient and they are led into a life promised you if you only listen to your Lord, thy God. You see? One must understand these stories were not only to be historical but to teach you what happens in your life and will happen in your life, as God used an entire nation , even more than one entire nation and even previously unknown individuals, to serve a world in lesson and in leadership.

The History of the Jews and the lessons shown in that history is not superceeded but built on by the New Testament. Indeed, in the Old one can see God leaving pointers to He who would appear in the New as the Christ. Look closely and you will see He appear in the Old and then watch the lessons evolve and also see the "signposts" promising God in the form of Man, who taught us that God is not just a God who punishes but who also loves his Children and teaches us that at this point in the lives of the Jewish nation and at some point in our live we must put anger away and love one another as He loves us.

The Bible is a journey from Our Creation, to Our Wilderness Journey (remember yours?), our being led out of the Wilderness past vanquished enemies (sins) and into a better life content and happy and finally the End which then we find is the Beginning again. Along the way you make mistakes and turn away from good and then fall on your ass and are led back out and fall on your ass even more when you rebel and then are lead back and then you learn lessons and wisdom (the book of Proverbs) and then...well, I won't completely spoil the story of your life especially since you are just getting to that good part.

Finally, you must be receptive to the Word to understand the Word or you will simply see wars, death and even say the Bible encourages the dark deeds of men. Until you ask Him what it is all about and for understanding then you will have none and will forever "wander in the wilderness".




tweakabelle -> RE: Conservative christian values now include rape? (3/19/2012 2:18:56 AM)

Such an effusive conglomeration of patronising condescending evasion BS and contradiction. One of the more consistent examples of mumbo-jumbo I've seen here for quite a while.

I have serious fears for your equilibrium if you think for a moment any reasonably intelligent person might find an answer to any of the questions posed to you, or be persuaded by that mass of disconnected chaotic verbiage.

Dream whatever dream you like. Trying to pass it off as the way of the world, as something real, as something that exists outside your head is fraudulent and deceptive. Please try to remember that it might only work for you.

So please stop trying to influence others lives with such patent trash. And please leave subjects like rape well alone. I find your contributions on that topic on this thread are genuinely evil and deeply offensive. You'll be doing yourself and the world a favour by maintaining a silence on that particular topic. If you're an iota as high minded as you like to present yourself, you'll gladly make the sacrifice.




PeonForHer -> RE: Conservative christian values now include rape? (3/19/2012 4:40:08 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer


quote:

ORIGINAL: Arturas
Therefore, the Bible protects her and makes you, the rapist, responsible for her, to her father and for her future welfare.


How does paying her father fifty pieces of silver have any bearing on 'protecting' the woman who's been raped? It's so clear that crystal is as mud in a whirlpool by comparison: With his daughter having been raped, the father's 'property' has been devalued. That section of the Bible is pure ugliness.


The rapist is the only person in the scenario who comes out ahead. On what basis are we to consider this piece of vicious misogyny to be anti-rape or "protective" of women?

The poor woman is a thing to be used, abused, then exchanged in a tawdry bit of commerce designed only to restore the 'rights' of the owner, and to reward the rapist with the object of his lust while condemning the woman to a lifetime of enslavement to her rapist. That the woman is a human being doesn't even enter the equation at any point.

I admire your restraint in describing it as merely "pure ugliness". To me it is a lot more than merely aesthetically outrageous.


Fair enough. "A load of hideous, fucked up bollocks written by a savage". Will that do? [:)]




tweakabelle -> RE: Conservative christian values now include rape? (3/19/2012 6:12:24 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer


quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer


quote:

ORIGINAL: Arturas
Therefore, the Bible protects her and makes you, the rapist, responsible for her, to her father and for her future welfare.


How does paying her father fifty pieces of silver have any bearing on 'protecting' the woman who's been raped? It's so clear that crystal is as mud in a whirlpool by comparison: With his daughter having been raped, the father's 'property' has been devalued. That section of the Bible is pure ugliness.


The rapist is the only person in the scenario who comes out ahead. On what basis are we to consider this piece of vicious misogyny to be anti-rape or "protective" of women?

The poor woman is a thing to be used, abused, then exchanged in a tawdry bit of commerce designed only to restore the 'rights' of the owner, and to reward the rapist with the object of his lust while condemning the woman to a lifetime of enslavement to her rapist. That the woman is a human being doesn't even enter the equation at any point.

I admire your restraint in describing it as merely "pure ugliness". To me it is a lot more than merely aesthetically outrageous.


Fair enough. "A load of hideous, fucked up bollocks written by a savage". Will that do? [:)]


You took the words from the tip of my tongue ! [:D]




thishereboi -> RE: Conservative christian values now include rape? (3/19/2012 6:46:52 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: xssve

And since you're a professed lesbian, we're gonna have to think about stoning you - 'cept I think you're already stoned.

On glue, if I'm any judge of it. [:D]



I guess that means you are not much of a judge.




Moonhead -> RE: Conservative christian values now include rape? (3/19/2012 8:13:52 AM)

Maybe he lacks your judgement of which glue is the good shit?




Kirata -> RE: Conservative christian values now include rape? (3/19/2012 8:46:53 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Arturas

I can however teach you what you do not know... you must be receptive to the Word to understand the Word

Didn't this show run on Gorway a while back? I seem to remember reading a review of it.

K.




thishereboi -> RE: Conservative christian values now include rape? (3/19/2012 9:00:40 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

Maybe he lacks your judgement of which glue is the good shit?



I wouldn't know. I haven't tried sniffing clue since I was about 13. My guess is it's changed a bit since then.




kdsub -> RE: Conservative christian values now include rape? (3/19/2012 9:06:05 AM)

quote:

Actually, while we have histrionic idiots on here claiming that a few arrests of people who may be plants discredits the whole of the OWS bunch, there's no earthly reason why this twat can't be similarly treated as an avatar for the whole of the tea party


I agree...both groups are criminal and full of loonies

Butch




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875