thompsonx
Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: subrob1967 quote:
ORIGINAL: thompsonx quote:
ORIGINAL: subrob1967 quote:
ORIGINAL: thompsonx quote:
she's made a career out of protesting, and advocating. What precisely do you find objectionable about one exercising their constitutional rights, which you as an alleged copper have sworn a sacred oath to protect? Let's call a spade, a spade, shall we? If she's a professional advocate, with years of experience, just say so. Instead we get the poor little twenty three year old coed denied basic medical prescriptions. Stop pretending she wasn't placed there by Mrs Pelosi, and Ms Fluke was a random student pulled from the ranks of Georgetown Uni. It's pretty black and white from this end, Mr bold type. Would you please answer mr. bold type's question? I'll spell it out so even a progressive can understand... Ms Fluke has a been portrayed as an innocent 23 year old poor coed unable to afford her birth control, when in fact she's a 30 year old, with a history of activism, and apparently a rich boyfriend who pays for her trips to Spain and Italy, if the pictures I've seen are to be believed. If you're going to portray yourself falsely, one can be expected to be called on it. quote:
ORIGINAL: dcnovice Obviously, any witness testifying before Congress is gonna be carefully selected and probably primed a bit. Does that make him or her a "plant"? If Fluke was a plant, was Bishop Lori, who testified on the all-male Republican panel, one as well? It's not like the GOP just grabbed the first clergyman it could find. I didn't see the Republicans trying to pass Bishop Lori off as anything other than a Catholic Bishop. like a poor 23 year old law student... Did you? Any chance you will ever answer the question?
|