How The 1934 Recovery Benefited The 99 Percent, While 2010's Benefited The Rich (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


kalikshama -> How The 1934 Recovery Benefited The 99 Percent, While 2010's Benefited The Rich (3/27/2012 9:58:15 AM)

In 2010, as the nation slowly ground its way from Great Recession to recovery, 93 percent of national income gains went to the richest 1 percent of Americans. As Reuters’s David Cay Johnston pointed out today, this makes the 2010 recovery quite different from the recovery that followed the Great Depression, as then, income gains were widely shared by the population, not concentrated at the very top:

The 1934 economic rebound was widely shared, with strong income gains for the vast majority, the bottom 90 percent.

In 2010, we saw the opposite as the vast majority lost ground.

National income gained overall in 2010, but all of the gains were among the top 10 percent. Even within those 15.6 million households, the gains were extraordinarily concentrated among the super-rich, the top one percent of the top one percent.

Just 15,600 super-rich households pocketed an astonishing 37 percent of the entire national gain.

[image]http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/1934recoverychart.png[/image]

During the recovery, corporate profits have also roared back, already hitting their pre-recession heights. Wages, however, have not done the same.




LoreBook -> RE: How The 1934 Recovery Benefited The 99 Percent, While 2010's Benefited The Rich (3/27/2012 1:18:09 PM)

TNG might just have a point about the US being a plutocracy (I had to ask her what that word meant when she said it [;)]).




kalikshama -> RE: How The 1934 Recovery Benefited The 99 Percent, While 2010's Benefited The Rich (3/27/2012 4:47:43 PM)

Here's the link: http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2012/03/16/446102/chart-1934-2010-recovery-rich/




LookieNoNookie -> RE: How The 1934 Recovery Benefited The 99 Percent, While 2010's Benefited The Rich (3/27/2012 5:36:51 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: kalikshama

In 2010, as the nation slowly ground its way from Great Recession to recovery, 93 percent of national income gains went to the richest 1 percent of Americans. As Reuters’s David Cay Johnston pointed out today, this makes the 2010 recovery quite different from the recovery that followed the Great Depression, as then, income gains were widely shared by the population, not concentrated at the very top:

The 1934 economic rebound was widely shared, with strong income gains for the vast majority, the bottom 90 percent.

In 2010, we saw the opposite as the vast majority lost ground.

National income gained overall in 2010, but all of the gains were among the top 10 percent. Even within those 15.6 million households, the gains were extraordinarily concentrated among the super-rich, the top one percent of the top one percent.

Just 15,600 super-rich households pocketed an astonishing 37 percent of the entire national gain.

[image]http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/1934recoverychart.png[/image]

During the recovery, corporate profits have also roared back, already hitting their pre-recession heights. Wages, however, have not done the same.


So, get in the game.

No one's stopping you from being rich.

Sorry, that's not true.

You are.




xssve -> RE: How The 1934 Recovery Benefited The 99 Percent, While 2010's Benefited The Rich (3/27/2012 6:46:50 PM)

Fucking telemarketers - your slot isn't till after primetime.




xssve -> RE: How The 1934 Recovery Benefited The 99 Percent, While 2010's Benefited The Rich (3/27/2012 6:48:55 PM)

quote:

The most comprehensive comparative study, done last year by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, found that “upward mobility from the bottom” — Daniels’s definition — was significantly lower in the United States than in most major European countries, including Germany, Sweden, the Netherlands and Denmark. Another study, by the Institute for the Study of Labor in Germany in 2006, uses other metrics and concludes that “the U.S. appears to be exceptional in having less rather than more upward mobility.”


http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-downward-path-of-upward-mobility/2011/11/09/gIQAegpS6M_story.html




Page: [1]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125