DarqueMirror -> RE: "the exacerbation of and the exploitation of racial conflict" (4/1/2012 12:03:02 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: FatDomDaddy Well... just to be clear, probable case is the standard for which a police officer or other sworn agent has to meet in order to arrest a person, conduct a legal search or request a warrant. An agent or an officer of the law does not need probable cause to investigate, question or even for short periods of time to detain a person. For that they only need to meet, reasonable or individual grounds and/or reason or individual suspicion. True, but the cop does not, over his radio, outline every shred of evidence in a crime in order to initiate a traffic stop. He simply says "pulling one over for driving erratically." Or "show me in a traffic stop with a suspicus vehicle." The point being, cops stop "suspicious people" every day. No one asks them to say why the person looks suspicious until they do or o not find evidence and proceed with the rest of the case/incident. I've seen countless episodes of "Cops" where they go through an entire stop, search, arrest, etc. *Then* you see them explaining their version of vents to their supervisor. "I observed the individual acting suspiciously, and proceeded to initiate a stop. The suspect then tried to flee and...etc. etc."
|
|
|
|