RE: Missing slave

RE: Missing slave (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid

Message

poise -> RE: Missing slave (4/2/2012 7:48:18 PM)
[sm=biggrin.gif][sm=biggrin.gif][sm=biggrin.gif][sm=biggrin.gif]

WinsomeDefiance -> RE: Missing slave (4/2/2012 11:11:25 PM)
Scammer, or this is just a fishing expedition to get people to look at the profile. Whatever the case, it really was an ummm, interesting read. I just skimmed her profile, but I got the impression it was a profile that probably needed reporting.

kalikshama -> RE: Missing slave (4/3/2012 7:45:22 AM)
I'd report her but it's too incoherent for me to ascertain if she is actually offering bestiality. Thoughts?

kalikshama -> RE: Missing slave (4/3/2012 7:55:13 AM)
quote: I had until now thought it was considered bad form to comment here on the profile of someone who is not a party to the discussion. I'm glad it's OK because asking questions here will be a lot easier now that I can point to example profiles, Yes? Not really, see below. quote: This [censored username] is a prime example of that. Would it really be OK for me to go to the Ask A Submissive forum and ask, say, do you think there are really Doms who would be a match for her? I KNOW I'm not. There is no point in bringing that particular profile to Ask a Submissive for a reality check as it is obviously not real. Additionally, you can't quote from a profile with the intent of drawing negative attention to it. This is known as "blacklisting" and is against the TOS. You'll note that I did not mention a user by name and that the point of the OP was not to draw negative attention. We seem to be given more latitude in critiquing obvious scam profiles.

LafayetteLady -> RE: Missing slave (4/3/2012 7:58:08 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: kalikshama I'd report her but it's too incoherent for me to ascertain if she is actually offering bestiality. Thoughts? I don't think it is that incoherant and believe she is definately offering bestiality. She all but literally says "I will have sex with animals."

poise -> RE: Missing slave (4/3/2012 8:04:59 AM)
I feel sooooo gullible in the answer I initially gave. [8\|] I have since read and reported it. off to scrub with a brillo pad now

risktaker9 -> RE: Missing slave (4/3/2012 8:12:12 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LafayetteLady quote: ORIGINAL: kalikshama I'd report her but it's too incoherent for me to ascertain if she is actually offering bestiality. Thoughts? I don't think it is that incoherant and believe she is definately offering bestiality. She all but literally says "I will have sex with animals." I agree. She says she is looking for farmers with barn animals to own her, that's not any different than saying you'd like to meet someone who owns a large dog is it? What are the chances that either of those two things is completely innocent? Here's the thing, if you actually did just love to be around barn animals or large dogs would you actually put that in your profile? Probably not because every sicko around would pounce on it thinking something else, so if it's mentioned then its intended to be taken for kink. Everything else in her profile is kink, why should the animal thing be the only non-kinky thing in there? After reading the profile and wondering how the OP could be taken in with this fiction to the point of calling her Honey in his post I'm just shaking my head. As if this woman in either incarnation was real. Her profile seemed to throw in everything she'd ever read about kinky sex in the hopes of getting something down the line from someone stupid enough to think she's real. How much you want to bet that the OP wouldn't fork over any cash and got shunned as a result? This is why 'she' is someone else now, he wasn't forking over anything and was therefore a waste of her time.

kalikshama -> RE: Missing slave (4/3/2012 10:58:01 AM)
quote: I feel sooooo gullible in the answer I initially gave 99% of the time you would have been right [:)]

Page: << < prev 1 [2]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.0625