Santorum's revisionism (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


DarkSteven -> Santorum's revisionism (4/5/2012 7:52:57 PM)

He claims that, if he rewrites history, he's not doing so badly.




servantforuse -> RE: Santorum's revisionism (4/5/2012 8:19:22 PM)

So What. Santorum will not be the nominee..He is behind in his home state by 8 % ,,




Owner59 -> RE: Santorum's revisionism (4/5/2012 9:26:17 PM)

He`s not quiting though.

Said he knows he can`t win but wants to instead,deny Wilard enough delegates for a clear win.

Which is possible.

Then.....................Mittens will HAVE to make Rick his VP mate........I meant "mate" in the non-sexual way of course......[:D]




Owner59 -> RE: Santorum's revisionism (4/5/2012 9:57:32 PM)

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/06/us/politics/rick-santorum-meets-with-conservative-leaders.html


A group of conservative leaders met with Rick Santorum on Thursday to consider various strategies to help his faltering campaign for the Republican presidential nomination, including some discussion of how to persuade Newt Gingrich to drop out of the contest.



He`s not go`n anywhere......[:D]




SoftBonds -> RE: Santorum's revisionism (4/5/2012 11:02:26 PM)

Odds of Mitt keeping anyone else from getting 50% of the delegates are about 100% now. Odds of Mitt getting more than anyone else are 99%, and odds that he gets more than 50% himself are like 96%. Rick is gone already, he is in it for a different reason.
The republican party, absent a VP or incumbent President, always selects the candidate from the previous election that does the best, then steps down for the good of the party. That is why I knew Mitt would be the nominee a year ago (actually, I knew it when Obama won the election). Rick needs to hang on long enough to knock Newt out of the running for the automatic slot in the 2016 race. Good news for dems, Rick Santorum will be the Republican nominee in 2016...




truckinslave -> RE: Santorum's revisionism (4/6/2012 2:32:54 AM)

quote:

Which is possible.


Not in any practical sense.
Romney is all but mathematically assured of a majority of delegates.




truckinslave -> RE: Santorum's revisionism (4/6/2012 2:35:06 AM)

quote:

Good news for dems, Rick Santorum will be the Republican nominee in 2016...


Whoever Romney picks as VP is the presumptive nominee for 2020.




DarkSteven -> RE: Santorum's revisionism (4/6/2012 4:37:27 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: truckinslave

Romney is all but mathematically assured of a majority of delegates.


Agreed. Romney has over 50% of assigned delegates at this point. The GOP leaders have conceded that he's going to win, which makes people less likely to vote for Santorum/Gingrich/Paul. So his majority will increase. It's in the bag.




Page: [1]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125