|
chores4sf -> RE: ask a money slave (5/6/2012 4:25:51 PM)
|
I think most of the misunderstandings about money slavery and financial domination come from the terminology. It's really a financial fetish, it's not always domination nor is it domination of finances or paying for domination, not necessarily anyway.
In the same way that a foot fetishist is excited by feet or things related to feet, a financial fetishist is excited by the exchange of money.
Since it's been a month, maybe I can pick up a little here:
quote:
...so in your mind, what makes for a satisfying money play experience?
If it's just play then the feeling of humiliation and the feeling of having over spent that lasts well beyond the session.
quote:
Is the financial aspect an important part for you or is that the "price of admission" for something else?
Can you explain the feeling (yeah, I know that's almost impossible, feel free to be verbose) of the money transaction?
The financial aspect is very important. It's both symbolic and fulfilling in the same way that submitting to physical pain is for a the typical masochist.
The transaction itself feels like surrender, and then later that feeling of submission is perpetuated by having to be frugal.
quote:
What makes it worth the money for you? If the session isn't satisfying enough would you ask for your money back? Do you view it as a business transaction, or is paying itself an act of submission for you?
The paying itself is the important part. Consider the case of a place like Niteflirt where people are literally paying to pay more. The two, paying for a persons time and paying as part of a fetish are really often separate experiences.
quote:
I totally understand the desire to give and give and give to your dominant, but not so much to a virtual stranger.
Giving to a stranger, or more likely a pro-dom(me) (be they in person or online) is really just a way to play out a fantasy. When you do that you're submitting to your own fantasy, not really the other person.
|
|
|
|
