Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Personhood Amendment vs Contraception


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Personhood Amendment vs Contraception Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Personhood Amendment vs Contraception - 4/8/2012 1:29:20 PM   
xssve


Posts: 3589
Joined: 10/10/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Truthness


quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle
. It's to keep women barefoot, pregnant, and in the kitchen where these Neanderthals think they belong.


So you're claiming almost 50% of women are Neanderthals who want women pregnant and in the kitchen?

No, I think he's claiming 50% of women already have no choice but to be barefoot and pregnant.

And if 50% like that, it's no skin off my nose, but even if it were 99% that 99% has no right to dictate what happens in the other 1% of privately owned and operated uterus.

That's communism man.

_____________________________

Walking nightmare...

(in reply to Truthness)
Profile   Post #: 41
RE: Personhood Amendment vs Contraception - 4/8/2012 1:30:20 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: xssve

I keep saying it only makes sense as necessary to a human trafficking/extortion racket.

It's a pattern in large civilizations: encourage the masses to reproduce beyond their financial means, thereby impoverishing them, then criminalizing poverty.

It ensures a steady supply of cheap, perpetually indebted, and/or forced labor.






bingo! well said!


and again!

quote:

ORIGINAL: xssve

And if 50% like that, it's no skin off my nose, but even if it were 99% that 99% has no right to dictate what happens in the other 1% of privately owned and operated uterus.

That's communism man.



< Message edited by Real0ne -- 4/8/2012 1:36:02 PM >

_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to xssve)
Profile   Post #: 42
RE: Personhood Amendment vs Contraception - 4/8/2012 1:33:52 PM   
Truthness


Posts: 81
Joined: 4/8/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: xssve


that 99% has no right to dictate what happens in the other 1% of privately owned and operated uterus.




The location (the uterus in this case) is not the issue; the loss of life is.

If the location somehow granted immunity to scrutiny, then it would be perfectly fine to, say, smuggle heroin as long as she uses that location to do it.

(And I can't wait to see just how badly that statement is gonna be spun to claim things it never intended).

< Message edited by Truthness -- 4/8/2012 1:34:27 PM >

(in reply to xssve)
Profile   Post #: 43
RE: Personhood Amendment vs Contraception - 4/8/2012 1:37:43 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline 		WHO is the injured party that is going to press charges?

The STATE?

loss of POTENTIAL slave labor?

its jurisdictional not geographical.





< Message edited by Real0ne -- 4/8/2012 1:39:07 PM >

_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to Truthness)
Profile   Post #: 44
RE: Personhood Amendment vs Contraception - 4/8/2012 1:49:18 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline 		There are many "medicinal herbal" abortion remedies.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to Moonhead)
Profile   Post #: 45
RE: Personhood Amendment vs Contraception - 4/8/2012 1:52:19 PM   
Moonhead


Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline 		Do any of them work?

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 46
RE: Personhood Amendment vs Contraception - 4/8/2012 1:57:15 PM   
xssve


Posts: 3589
Joined: 10/10/2009
Status: offline 		The location is everything, since it's part of another persons body.

I think I'll move in between your old ladies legs, and you two can take care of me the rest of my life, it's your sacred duty, I'm life too.

< Message edited by xssve -- 4/8/2012 2:03:48 PM >

_____________________________

Walking nightmare...

(in reply to Truthness)
Profile   Post #: 47
RE: Personhood Amendment vs Contraception - 4/8/2012 2:02:28 PM   
xssve


Posts: 3589
Joined: 10/10/2009
Status: offline 		I wonder if every woman insisted on only anal, oral, masturbation, or same sex if they didn't want to get knocked up, if that would satisfy everybody?

I don't see how anybody could argue with that, it's fair enough.

It would certainly alter the nature of the debate pretty quick.

_____________________________

Walking nightmare...

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 48
RE: Personhood Amendment vs Contraception - 4/8/2012 2:10:12 PM   
Moonhead


Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline 		That would imply that women are getting to make the decisions, though.
The whole problem here is surely that they aren't being allowed to do anything of the sort, so I can't see your solution working all that well, really...

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to xssve)
Profile   Post #: 49
RE: Personhood Amendment vs Contraception - 4/8/2012 2:16:22 PM   
xssve


Posts: 3589
Joined: 10/10/2009
Status: offline 		Works for me.

_____________________________

Walking nightmare...

(in reply to Moonhead)
Profile   Post #: 50
RE: Personhood Amendment vs Contraception - 4/8/2012 2:22:31 PM   
xssve


Posts: 3589
Joined: 10/10/2009
Status: offline 		As an alternative we could require every pregnant woman to provide a sperm sample from the father for DNA confirmation and send him the bill.

_____________________________

Walking nightmare...

(in reply to xssve)
Profile   Post #: 51
RE: Personhood Amendment vs Contraception - 4/8/2012 2:34:51 PM   
SoftBonds


Posts: 862
Joined: 2/10/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Truthness

quote:

ORIGINAL: xssve


that 99% has no right to dictate what happens in the other 1% of privately owned and operated uterus.




The location (the uterus in this case) is not the issue; the loss of life is.

If the location somehow granted immunity to scrutiny, then it would be perfectly fine to, say, smuggle heroin as long as she uses that location to do it.

(And I can't wait to see just how badly that statement is gonna be spun to claim things it never intended).


OK Truthy, here is the deal. You can force a woman to use her body for your ends (keeping the baby), but you are going to have to pay for it. Her medical bills, her food, shelter, the special clothing she has to buy, all of it. The pro-life folks will pay for all the babies that women don't want to have, but are forced to by the state. After all, doesn't the 5th amendment to the constitution say:
"nor shall private property be taken for public use without just compensation."

You see, if a state doesn't allow a woman to get an abortion, the state has taken her womb for public use, and she has the right to sue the state for the value of that property!

Edit: unless the right want to claim that a woman's body doesn't belong to her???

< Message edited by SoftBonds -- 4/8/2012 2:35:46 PM >

_____________________________

Elite Thread Hijacker!
Ignored: ThompsonX, RealOne (so folks know why I don't reply)

The last poster is often not the "winner," of the thread, just the one who was most annoying.

(in reply to Truthness)
Profile   Post #: 52
RE: Personhood Amendment vs Contraception - 4/8/2012 2:42:10 PM   
Moonhead


Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline 		Isn't claiming that a woman's body doesn't belong to her the default stance of most pro lifers>?

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to SoftBonds)
Profile   Post #: 53
RE: Personhood Amendment vs Contraception - 4/8/2012 2:42:58 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

Do any of them work?


Actually yes.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to Moonhead)
Profile   Post #: 54
RE: Personhood Amendment vs Contraception - 4/8/2012 2:44:49 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

Isn't claiming that a woman's body doesn't belong to her the default stance of most pro lifers>?


Ok, I gotta tell ya.. this all gives me the giggles.

A group of Conversatives who were so fiscally irresponsible with the US purse strings are demanding woman take "responsibility" for their sexual choices and carry a fetus to term.

Am I the only one who sees the irony in that?


_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to Moonhead)
Profile   Post #: 55
RE: Personhood Amendment vs Contraception - 4/8/2012 2:50:15 PM   
xssve


Posts: 3589
Joined: 10/10/2009
Status: offline 		Clear cut case of takings.

_____________________________

Walking nightmare...

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 56
RE: Personhood Amendment vs Contraception - 4/8/2012 2:51:21 PM   
Truthness


Posts: 81
Joined: 4/8/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl


quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

Isn't claiming that a woman's body doesn't belong to her the default stance of most pro lifers>?


Ok, I gotta tell ya.. this all gives me the giggles.

A group of Conversatives who were so fiscally irresponsible with the US purse strings are demanding woman take "responsibility" for their sexual choices and carry a fetus to term.

Am I the only one who sees the irony in that?



Yep, I do. I wish politicians in general were even half as responsible as they claim others should be.

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 57
RE: Personhood Amendment vs Contraception - 4/8/2012 3:11:54 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline 		That is definitely something we can agree upon.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to Truthness)
Profile   Post #: 58
RE: Personhood Amendment vs Contraception - 4/8/2012 3:32:32 PM   
SoftBonds


Posts: 862
Joined: 2/10/2012
Status: offline 		Funny how as soon as I show that the constitution means any woman forced not to have an abortion can sue the state for the cost of her body, the desire to make abortion illegal is no longer worth discussing? Do the pro-lifers not want to pay higher taxes to pay women for their wombs?

_____________________________

Elite Thread Hijacker!
Ignored: ThompsonX, RealOne (so folks know why I don't reply)

The last poster is often not the "winner," of the thread, just the one who was most annoying.

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 59
RE: Personhood Amendment vs Contraception - 4/8/2012 3:36:57 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline 		I personally liked your aspirin solution.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to SoftBonds)
Profile   Post #: 60
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Personhood Amendment vs Contraception Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094