PeonForHer -> RE: Forced by to slave for Mistress (4/18/2012 4:16:25 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyPact I think the thread might be continuing because for some of us, it's a legitimate kink and a way to see just how far authority can control a person in a dynamic. Who knows? Maybe folks are still reading it because they are noticing the difference in the genders on this one. No male Dom ever comes on these boards, discussing the authority that he has over his female s type that she is hetero flexible if he chooses, and comments from the forum don't start arguing about how she must have really wanted to do it all along. That female s type must have really wanted to be with another woman and it can't possibly be the fact that the person in charge had that kind of authority. Granted, the OP has himself a neat little kink fantasy. Just for fun, let's say that he runs across a chick that really enjoys watching m/m cock sucking. Maybe he's just scared or hesitant. He might even just need someone to make sure he goes through with it because he can't follow through on his own. Might even want to make that leap to being bi, but needs that extra push. Any of these are good. The chick knows that she's getting her live cock sucking show sooner or later. At the same time, there might just be male submissives out there who feel completely differently about the idea of cock sucking. What happens when he meets the same chick? Is there any possibility that over the years, he gets to the point where the activity goes from hard limit, to soft limit, to a potential possibility, to something he is willing to do because it is what he was told? I don't know. I would think if somebody ran across a chick who really liked watching, that might be something that came up from time to time. If she had herself someone who had his own ideas on the subject, she might be able to figure that out. Even better, if the idea excited him for his own desires, she'd capitalize on that and get what she wants out of the deal a whole lot faster. That way, she wouldn't have to wait until she gained that level of authority over him and his sexuality. Nah. That couldn't possibly be it. Now, LP, let's face it: it isn't logical to talk about 'forced bi'. This is BDSM we're talking about here - and everything about BDSM just *must* be logical. Personally, I think it's illogical to try to impose logic on something so illogical as BDSM, or sex, or even love, for that matter. You have far more fun going with 'illogical'. Wish I could do it better myself, frankly, a lot of the time. As far as I'm concerned a great deal about BDSM is forced-but-not-forced. I'm not sure why people put up with the illogic of that as a general thing, but zero in on the particular illogic of the 'forced-bi' kink. Me, I remember the days when I used to think, '"What's the point in *allowing* yourself to be locked up in order to be flogged? Surely that defeats the object?" OK, I get that now. I just get it that people do something weird in order to get a buzz, that's all. Fine by me. Of course 'forced bi' is nutty. But isn't that true of most of WIITWD? We make a rational choice to plunge into the depths of unreason, to get what we can out of it. I thought that was the whole point.
|
|
|
|