A Zillion Shades Of Consent (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


kalikshama -> A Zillion Shades Of Consent (4/17/2012 3:38:24 PM)

Great thread on fet regarding consent. I'd like to continue the convo here cuz y'all are my peeps and I hate that white text on fet.

Note "Sexy Bottom" posts later in the thread and not surprisingly has a different version than the narrator.

https://fetlife.com/users/81291/posts/991260

We like to know who the villain is. Life seems so much more clear when we have a clear enemy to fight against. (Pardon me while I be a little US-centric here.) In WWII it was Hitler. (Have I automatically Godwin-ed myself already?) After that it was the USSR and all things communist. Then it got a bit murky a bit till we got Osama Bin Laden.

We like clear enemies. Good vs Evil. Superman vs Lex Luthor. Harry vs Voldemort. Kantiss vs The Capitol. We want our bad guys pure, unambiguous, and absolutely getting what they deserve. We live for this shit. We party in the streets for what we see as justice.

So, what does this have to do with kink?

Welcome to the Consent Culture Showdown.

In one corner you have those crusading for victims' rights, trying to give a voice to the oppressed. Those who know the oft quoted statistics of 1 in 4 women being sexually assaulted in their life time. That such crimes are under reported, especially amongst the LGBTQ community. That reporting them often does no damn good anyway.

In the other corner you have those who are championing the falsely accused. Those who have dealt with the unmedicated and/or spiteful seeking revenge and have labeled them “batshit” and “drama queens" to regain their footing in a situation spiraling out of control. Those who thought they were doing everything right and STILL had accusations hurled at them. Many who, rather than have a conversation thought the best tactic was to fire back any way they could.

And somewhere in the middle you have people like me.

People who believe neither side is wrong, that both have merit, and both, when taken to extremes are EXTREMELY DANGEROUS to this community.

Or so is my opinion. For whatever that is worth. (About as much as the paper this is written on.)

See, here's the thing, both sides want their villains evil and see themselves to be on the side of righteous goodness.

BUT THE WORLD DOESN'T WORK THAT WAY.

There are no white hats and black hats. There is a lot of freaking grey. Way more than 50 shades.

Understand, as I sit reading all the arguments, debates, and righteous indignation begetting personal filters over-riding reading comprehension skills, all I can do is think of something I witnessed last year that would forever change my view on this whole issues.

It was a kinky camp event on the East Coast. The last day, we were all happy and tired, and getting our last bit of fun in. There was a group outside a cabin paying some lovely attention to the bottom of, well, let's call this person 'Sexy Bottom.'

Along comes a person, we'll call them 'Big Top.' These two know each other. Now here is where memory gets unclear (and this in and of itself is important) so the exact details are lost but basically 'Big Top' mentions an implement to join in the fun. 'Sexy Bottom' mentions the last time they played with 'Big Top' and them having bruises that lasted way too long for their liking. 'Big Top' says something. 'Sexy Bottom' says something. The exchange comes off as banter for those witnessing it.

Or, at least it did to me. At the moment.

Back comes 'Big Top' with said implement. The person – who to me seemed like they were running the show, but I could have been wrong – gives the 'by all means' go ahead to 'Big Top.' And 'Big Top' takes a swat.

'Sexy Bottom' springs off the railing from which they were bent over exclaiming, “What the SHIT!?!” and starts looking at all of us like we shot their dog.

You could hear Midori's 'Crickets of Undo' as we all tried to puzzle out what the hell just happened.

'Sexy Bottom's' eyes land on me and the lightbulb goes off.
“No 'Big Top'...” I say.
“No 'Big Top.,” They say.

There's a collective “Aaaa...OOOOhhhhhhh...” as it all dawns on everyone , and the light bulbs come on as to just where it went sideways. That the banter wasn't banter. It was saying “No.”

Apologies were made. Things seemed better after that. Only they can say for sure.

I, being the communication geek that I am, was left shaken by the whole incident. I kept thinking over and over to myself:

How do THAT many people miss someone saying “No?”
Then:

Oh gods, if that many people can miss it, what the fuck happens when it is only two people?
How bad is it when it is just two people high on endorphins and adrenalin and dopamine...
Or more?
That incident drove home something I had always known, but never really understood until that moment:

It is completely possible for two people (or more) to have two (or more) different stories and all be telling the absolute truth as they know it.

This is important to this whole issue. It is SO easy to get caught up in “They are lying!” to make one's attacker or accuser into that clear cut enemy. Does it matter if they are “lying” or if they have experienced the event different than you did?

What is more important is not their “lies” but your truth. You experienced something. You felt something. You heard things and interpreted them to mean something.

If a person is experiencing an event different than you did, somewhere in the middle is the Truth.

So, rather than brand someone with an epitaph (predator, drama queen, etc), wouldn't it be better to face the person and find out their truth? They may be repentant. They may be clueless. You don't want to be burdened with educating them, ok, then you don't have to burden yourself with the shit talk either.

To Clarify my definition: Talking to friends offering their shoulder about what happened to you in terms of your own experience = Not Shit talk.
Warning people to stay away from someone and /or going off on public internet rants about specific people dragging them into it = Shit talk.
See, because what drives ME nuts, personally, is the assumption of, “Oh, they KNOW what they did.”

Did you read the above example? See a whole bunch of people not knowing?

HUMANS ARE NOT MINDREADERS. Please, stop assuming because someone was in the same room with you they know your thoughts. I know we like to play at being all knowing, especially those into anticipatory service and those Domly doms who can read you so well, but really – still human.

To be clear, YES, I believe there are some truly evil fucked up people out there. Ones who seek power via violence and assault. People who try to make themselves feel greater by making others small and powerless. I believe they can be Dom, Sub, Switch, Male, Female, Transgender, Queer... does not matter. I am not discussing these cases. At all. So please, before you start in with the hate comments about how I am “invalidating your experience,” step away from the computer.

HOWEVER, I do NOT believe that everyone who has stumbled across a boundary, or fucked up on an issue of consent, is an irredeemable abuser who must be outed to all as a Predator to be warned away from.

Because if that's the case then I challenge everyone who has been in the scene to NEVER do this at some point in time. To never step on someone's toes. To never misread a signal. To never get caught up in a moment. To ALWAYS catch the hints. You all have the potential to be a “Predator” or “Prey.”

I've said it many times before. I'll say it again.

We play with emotional dynamite in this scene.

(A quote that I have shamelessly stolen from @Pyrategrrl and used for years.)

Not one of us are experts on how to diffuse this bomb.

That Memo was a tool – a pretty incomplete one at that, and only one of many out there – for how avoid setting it off, or barring that, how to avoid so many casualties if it does go off.

Take it. Leave it. It's your choice.

It's ALL your choice.

YOU are the one responsible for you. I like negotiations because I don't trust that people are going to volunteer what I need to know. I'm being responsible... for me. When two people come together in a scene, they, I hope, trust that they are both responsible for what they create together (thank you @RoughMercies for that phrasing). But understand if one person does not uphold that trust, FROM EITHER END, no one is going to rescue you. Not from them. And not from yourself.

For just as there are no clear cut villains – there are NO heroes in this scene either.

There's just humans.




frazzle -> RE: A Zillion Shades Of Consent (4/17/2012 3:46:58 PM)

was there a question somewhere in there?




kalikshama -> RE: A Zillion Shades Of Consent (4/17/2012 3:57:42 PM)

It's a jumping off point for a discussion on consent. My position is that bottoms need to be very clear and blunt when expressing "No." I would not expect a sadist to interpret "that left more bruises than I wanted" as "do not use that on me again."

An additional problem is that women especially are trained to be polite, which often creates ambiguity.




frazzle -> RE: A Zillion Shades Of Consent (4/17/2012 4:01:16 PM)

Ive always found that "do that again and i'll kill you" works wonders for consent.




frazzle -> RE: A Zillion Shades Of Consent (4/17/2012 4:02:23 PM)

Oh and women in my family regard personal safety well above polite.




wittynamehere -> RE: A Zillion Shades Of Consent (4/17/2012 4:07:44 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: frazzle
Ive always found that "do that again and i'll kill you" works wonders for consent.

You've not only managed to spam up a perfect good thread with 3 useless posts before anyone else got in here, but you've demonstrated you don't even understand what the word "consent" means. Consent is not threatening physical violence after you've been assaulted by someone. Please delete your posts and don't make another until you either understand the topic, have something useful to say, or hopefully both.




DesFIP -> RE: A Zillion Shades Of Consent (4/17/2012 4:58:59 PM)

Somewhere on fl there was a thread a couple of days ago about tactfully turning someone down for play.
What came out of it, is that men commonly don't hear tact. They hear it as okay, or she's just being coy.

At the same time, women report that when they are clear and blunt about turning a guy down, they get attacked as bitches.

Especially in a case as you report, where the bottom was already rather spacy from the fun going on, the ability to be blunt isn't going to exist. The top knew she had concerns last time that made her unhappy with that implement. Instead of asking clearly for permission, he chose to take it as granted. How different is this from a guy who after dinner refuses to take the word no when the date doesn't want to go farther than some hot kisses, and assumes she means yes?




kalikshama -> RE: A Zillion Shades Of Consent (4/17/2012 5:09:02 PM)

quote:

What came out of it, is that men commonly don't hear tact. They hear it as okay, or she's just being coy.


At a naked regatta, I had to shriek "GET AWAY FROM ME!" for a guy to register my disinterest. Some other women thanked me, as he had been bothering them too. I didn't know him, so I especially didn't care if he thought I was a bitch.

I was more uncomfortable at a clothing optional party at my house when an acquaintance was stroking his cock while we were talking and I was trapped in the kitchen cooking. I don't remember how that one ended except that scalding was not involved [:D]




fucktoyprincess -> RE: A Zillion Shades Of Consent (4/17/2012 5:27:18 PM)

I think men are hardwired to work every angle possible, so they will not take anything short of the clearest "no" or clearest safeword possible. At least, that's how I operate. So when dealing with a male Dominant, I think female submissives should err on the side of extreme clarity even if seems rude. Use your negotiated upon safeword if necessary. And if you don't have a negotiated safe word, then be sure the communication includes the word "no" unless you are trying to be coy and actually consenting.

I have to play, in whatever setting, with a safe word. Why? Because I enjoy being coy, I enjoy putting up a fight (even if it just the verbal, "no, no"). So, I have to have a pre-negotiated word in place that everyone understands means STOP, but can also be used to say NO to something, i.e., if you pull that out I will have to use my safeword, or much less ambiguous, "can I use this on you" and I just respond with my safeword.

And for the record, in my experience, female Dominants are much more careful and attune to push-back even when it is not put in the form of "no" or safeword. I've never had a female Dominant misunderstand me. Ever. So I do believe there is fundamentally a gender-based communication issue at play here.

Also, for anyone who thinks there is only one truth, you should watch Kurosawa's Rashomon. There is only ever each individual's subjective version of truth. And they don't always match up. The objective truth? Perhaps it lies in between. Perhaps, there isn't even such a thing.




LadyHibiscus -> RE: A Zillion Shades Of Consent (4/17/2012 6:19:56 PM)

Really good post, Kalik.

Locally, the cult of victim-blaming regularly goes head to head with the defenders of the damaged. An unwinnable war if ever there was one. I know that I've seen some questionable things, and not stepped in because I just wasn't sure...and even though I am not a safeword user, I sure as hell try to be sure that I know what "stop" means.




kitkat105 -> RE: A Zillion Shades Of Consent (4/17/2012 6:37:35 PM)

Let me preface this by saying I haven't been in this situation so I could just be talking out of my ass, but basically I imagine this may be more of a problem at play parties or with casual play partners, rather than someone you are in a relationship wth. There is possibly more opportunity for someone to be taken advantage of. In a way it reminds me of a vanilla person on the tour of the Armory asking why 'no' doesn't apply as a safeword. You could tell all the kinky minded people because they all laughed.

In a relationship, hopefully limits have been discussed in detail so both top & bottom understand what each other like, dislike and everything in between. Communication in a relationship is easier because it's someone you already know & trust, so to say, "No, that is too scary for me and I don't think I can do it"

In my relationship with Odeen, while we are very close to a 'blanket consent' for all activities, everything is basically discussed before it happens.




littlewonder -> RE: A Zillion Shades Of Consent (4/17/2012 7:31:09 PM)

I dunno...for me it IS black and white for me. If it's not to others, then they need to take control of their relationship. I'm certainly not going to take control of their relationship or their life or even situation.

For me I give consent once...that's it. What he does with it is his choice. I do the same at work. I give consent to work there once...when I sign the contract. After that, if my boss wants me to do something I either do it or quit...same as my relationship...I either do it or quit the relationship.

I simply think most people just are horrible at communication, be it male or female, bdsm or work or anything else in their life.




tsatske -> RE: A Zillion Shades Of Consent (4/17/2012 7:46:59 PM)

little wonder, what if you had a job you loved but your boss asked you to do something simple that ruined your day and made you want to quit? You wouldn't even check to see if this job was salvagable before quiting? Maybe he asked you to do it, but there are plenty of other ways to get it done and perhaps he values your work more than that.

Are you saying that anytime you are asked to work over or come in on your day off you say yes, no matter what? Not, 'I say yes if I can', but, from what you said, 'I say yes or I quit'. Am I understanding that correctly?




littlewonder -> RE: A Zillion Shades Of Consent (4/17/2012 8:27:30 PM)

If he asked me to do something that simply gave me a bad day I'd suck it up and do it. If he continued to make me do things that made my life unhappy and/or against my morals, I'd quit.

And yes, anytime I was asked to work overtime I said yes unless I had a legitimate reason for not being able to do so. I took my work seriously and felt that if I said no then my boss would not see me as part of the team of where I worked and it would jeopardize my chances of a promotion or raise or being treated decently at work.

Same thing goes for my relationship. When Master tells me to do something that makes the rest of my day suck, I just suck it up and do it. I will grumble, I will be unhappy and a complete grouch, but I do it. BUT if he did this day after day after day and/or it was against my morals and values, I'd quit the relationship.




Lucifyre -> RE: A Zillion Shades Of Consent (4/17/2012 9:09:05 PM)

Here is something else to toss into the mix (kind of jumping off of kitkats post)

Mr and I have been a couple for almost 20 years. We have been involved in BDSM in one way or another for 17 of those years. We STILL have a safeword even when we play in private.

Why? Because he can't read my mind. Because no matter how much I am into whatever it is he is doing, no matter how well he knows and can read my body and my reactions, there are still times when I float on that fine little line between "ouch that hurts good" and "OMFG UNTIE ME RIGHT NOW THAT FUCKING HURTS". It doesn't even have to be a swat that's too hard, it could be I squirmed into a position where it feels like a joint will pop or something, or one of my lips is being pinched in a not fun way.

Sometimes when we play even I am not aware of when I am close to that line until I am across it and need to safeword. Sometimes I get into a headspace (not sub space I don't think, though I can't really say for sure) where I am unable to communicate if things are going too far or somethings gone wrong. When he sees me get to that point he does try to slow down and watch me much more closely.

Fortunately I don't need to SW often any more and fortunately Mr genuinely has my well being at heart and loves me to the core of his soul and fortunately he always respects my safeword. Even when we are in a pushing limits kind of scene he respects my safeword and watches my body language.

BUT, no matter how much experience he and I have as a couple, we are still both only human. We cannot read eachothers minds. We cannot anticipate if or when something is going to turn the wrong corner. Even with prior discussion and "blanket consent" there are still things that can't be predicted.




LookieNoNookie -> RE: A Zillion Shades Of Consent (4/17/2012 10:31:33 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: frazzle

was there a question somewhere in there?



(Waaaaaay the fuck too long for me).

Unless of course, I actually read the words...which of course, after 2 paragraphs of blather.....I didn't.




LadyPact -> RE: A Zillion Shades Of Consent (4/18/2012 12:23:09 AM)

I did go and read part of this string over on Fet.  I was interested in what "SxyBottom" had to say about what had happened.  I had also wanted to see if any of the other folks who were involved in this incident had anything to say.  Even with the long read, I'm still kind of confused as to where this person who was "supposedly running the show" was giving the go ahead with this implement that had already been discussed.  I could have seen the bottom being ticked off at the top she had agreed to play with for allowing it. 

I'm not particularly victim blaming here, but I do think there is some responsibility.  Saying, "the last time you used that it bruised too much" is not as clear as just saying "no".  When people are negotiating a scene, whether they have played before or not, the two words that are clear as day are yes and no.  It's using other terms, expressions, and phrases that can contribute to outcomes exactly like the one related here.





kalikshama -> RE: A Zillion Shades Of Consent (4/18/2012 5:18:11 AM)

quote:

I did go and read part of this string over on Fet.  I was interested in what "SxyBottom" had to say about what had happened.

Sorry - I should have made it easier - to see what "SxyBottom" / "SB" has to say, do a Find for posts by mecha-kate.




fucktoyprincess -> RE: A Zillion Shades Of Consent (4/18/2012 6:16:42 AM)

I just want to add a few other comments.

I think it goes without saying that if this is not public play, or a relatively new partner, that as a couple gets to know each other better, communication obviously improves. I also think it goes without saying that within a relationship, two people can agree to use whatever works for them (i.e, no safeword, or a safeword only at the start of the relationship that as trust grows, or the dynamic changes, can be removed). Everyone has to approach their private relationships in a way that makes sense for them. And while I do use a safeword in my relationships, I have rarely had to use them.

However, I don't think anyone should be doing public play without a safeword or the equivalent in place (i.e., if you are playing, even as a couple, with others who are relatively new to you) regardless of what the underlying dynamic of your personal relationship is. In other words, you can have a D/s or M/s relationship with no safeword, but if you opt to play with others in a public setting, I don't think it's safe to not have a safeword in place, or a very clear understanding between all parties that "no" means no. This also means the submissive must use the safeword or "no" and not use ambiguous statements when they are really trying to say "no". And I feel this discussion needs to take place independent of whatever the rules of the house are. I think it up to whoever is playing to clarify the rules with the people playing up front, and not rely on an assumed understanding of the house rules, because people might be interpreting the house rules differently. I don't do a lot of public play anymore, but when I did, having certain things discussed up front was quite necessary even if my Dominant was present. [sm=2cents.gif]




IrishMist -> RE: A Zillion Shades Of Consent (4/18/2012 8:04:05 AM)

I'll be honest. I did not read your whole post kalikshama...it was just too dayum long. You lost me as soon as you linked to the other thread [&:] My response is based on the answers that others posted...so hopefully, I understand the gist of what you were trying to say.

Most of us here, have agreed, at one time or another, that the word 'consent' has so many different definitions that it could probably surpass your notion of 'a zillion'. Someone posted that for them, what would constitute consent within their personal relationship, would not mean the same in a public setting with someone outside of their SO. It was also mentioned that all too often, there is a lack of CLEAR communication when discussing 'consent' in a public area. A good example of this would be a submissive/bottom who IS a masochist looking at a whip and saying 'I don't want to be whipped', but not going into detail of WHY they don't want to be whipped. It leaves most with an idea that 'ok, they want to be persuaded'...in other words, pushed beyond their limits.

This person, the submissive or bottom that is, should instead be saying 'I will not allow a whip to be used on me for any reason, this is non-negotiable'. Instead of leaving it up in the air, it draws a very clear line of where they are willing to NOT go.

Too often, these kinds of negotiations do not take place, for a variety of reasons. What needs to be understood and stressed is that just because a person decides that they want to bottom/submit for a time, does not mean that they should lose their right to negotiate...it does not make that person less...it makes them SMART.
The same goes for a person who is making their first foray into the public arena. BE SMART about what you want, and what you are willing to allow happen. If someone is telling you that you can not make these demands, then you need to walk away from that person.

The same can be said within a personal relationship. I mentioned once before that I only consented once in my relationship, and that is true. He had the right to do to me anything he wanted.
What you need to understand though, is BEFORE I consented, we talked about what each of us expected from the other. A good example is bondage. Under no circumstances could I be bound in any way, even just holding my hands in a restraining manner...I totally lose all reason and control. It was dangerous for ME to be restrained. My late husband enjoyed restraints and bondage...yet, he gave that up for me and never once attempted to push this on me...despite the fact that once I consented to the relationship, he could have.
Clear communication between all parties involved. There were other things that we discussed and compromised on, but I thought the bondage aspect would make the most impact.

If a person decides to make the unfortunate decision to not be clear on what could and could not happen; then I have no sympathy for them. They placed themselves in that situation.

On the other hand, if clear communication did happen, and the top overstepped their bounds...then yes, they should be held accountable.




Page: [1] 2   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0625