shallowdeep
Posts: 343
Joined: 9/1/2006 From: California Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Awareness They're going to mine these things, not move them about. Actually, the goal is to move them about in the near future to enable the mining… but into lunar orbit, not an atmospheric entry. quote:
ORIGINAL: hardcybermaster I think the timescale is bollocks.. The 18-24 months is just for launching some small telescopes merely to start the search for candidate asteroids. No asteroid recovery attempt would be made until the next decade at the earliest. It's aggressive, but not out of the realm of reasonable possibility. This announcement was preceded by a feasibility study that concluded recovery of a 500,000 kg asteroid would be possible by 2025 at a cost of under $3 billion. quote:
Finding new and exciting elements in asteroids would possibly lead to huge steps forward. There won't be new elements. But there might be relatively high quantities of some elements that are rare in the Earth's crust. quote:
ORIGINAL: LookieNoNookie Until oil goes to $3,000.00 a barrel or gold goes to 12 kabillion an ounce... I don't get it. Given the extremely high terrestrial launch costs per kilogram, a few hundred tons of even plain water starts to look pretty valuable for future deep-space missions when it's already in lunar orbit. An asteroid with platinum-group metals in significant quantities would also be incredibly valuable. It's obviously a pretty high risk investment, though. quote:
ORIGINAL: FrostedFlake There are more than several problems to mull over. 1. What are these miners going to do with their spare time? It would seem that they will have a LOT of it. Actually not. The idea is to bring asteroids here robotically, not send miners out to them. The asteroids would be parked in lunar orbit, or at Earth-Moon Lagrange points, so travel to them from Earth would take a few days, not months. quote:
2. No mention, so far, of a superconducting electromagnet to deflect cosmic and solar radiation. Can't live without one of these. Can't mine ferrous metal if you do have one. There's no long trip, so the radiation isn't really an issue. If any long-term, non-robotic operations on the asteroid after recovery were needed, the asteroid itself would serve as passive shielding. As an aside, passive shielding is generally seen as the practical protection from radiation for human deep-space travel, not active electromagnets. quote:
3. Are they going to let the fragments of debris inevitably created while mining just fly about at random, imperiling the ship, or is there some containment technology in mind? This probably has some validity as a concern, but containment of debris doesn't seem particularly insurmountable. Something as simple as a plastic or kevlar wrap might well work.
|