Caius
Posts: 175
Joined: 2/2/2005 Status: offline
|
Well, you pretty much the nail on the head, Castle; each state varies considerable in this regard. Actually, few laws are likely to explicitly read as allowing for prosecution in such scenarios, but a majority of states have laws which could probably be stretched, under some context or another, to allow charges to be pressed even in the case of consensual activities, especially considering that few assault laws are written in such a manner where consent is even mentioned under the criteria for bringing charges. However, the thing you have to bear in mind is that it's one thing to indict, quite another to get an actual conviction. It's going to be hard to find a jury who will universally elect to punish someone for private consensual activities, and the political push-back most D.A.'s would face mean it's not likely to ever happen outside of cases with particularly zealous officials in very conservative areas. Even then, we're usually talking about heavily extenuating circumstances. The thing you must be mindful of (in the legal sense and the moral, really) is situations where the bottom could be perceived as unable to legally form consent; even if they say they did and oppose the charges, a person being heavily intoxicated, for example, would give any prosecutor a good shot if he wanted to go after you. Also bear in mind that the type of activity has significant impact on how vulnerable you'd be. That is, bullwhip =/ spanking, of course.
< Message edited by Caius -- 4/25/2012 4:03:55 AM >
|