Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

SM vs Abuse


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Alternative Lifestyles in the News >> SM vs Abuse Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
SM vs Abuse - 10/28/2004 3:24:54 PM   
sub4hire


Posts: 6775
Joined: 1/1/2004
Status: offline
Ok, so this isn't an official article yet. However a good friend of mine re-wrote this. Lost it a few times. I found it on one of my pc's so decided it is worhtwhile info so posting it here for all to read who so desire to.

SM Versus Abuse


The Difference between S/M and Abuse


This is my own version based on my experience and others in the leather community which on the following set of ideals based on established community principles that SM is fundamentally different from abuse. It is my hope the following standards and guidelines that are intended to help the law enforcement, social services, and members of the BDSM communities understand the difference between abusive relationships and S/M, which consists of diverse sexual practices that bring satisfaction and gratification to the participants. While I respect the diversity of the subculture, I believe that the autonomy and humanity of each individual must be respected and maintained.


S/M is the generally accepted term for a complex group of behaviors that involves the consensual giving and receiving of intense erotic sensation and/or intense mental discipline, and it is not about unresolved childhood issues of power, shame, or the eroticization of fear or violence.


If an individual is in an abusive relationship, then it is likely that physical and/or sexual activities will also be abusive. It is essential that those involved in diverse sexual relationships are not isolated from their family or friends. To ensure self-esteem, individuals must be free to discuss their preferences, practices and feelings with anyone they choose. Individuals must also be able to exercise self-determination when it comes to money, employment and life decisions.


SM includes: “Intimate activities within the scope of consent that is freely given.”


Abuse is:”Acts inflicted on a person without their freely given consent”


Standards
1. The community operates under the creed of “Safe, Sane and Consensual” sexual expression.




A. “Safe” is being knowledgeable about the techniques and safety concerns involved in what you are doing. Each participant must be informed about the possible risks, both mental and physical.




B. “Sane” is knowing the difference between fantasy and reality. Knowledgeable consent cannot be given if you are under the influence of drugs or alcohol.




C. “Consensual” is respecting the limits imposed by each participant. One of the most easily recognized ways to maintain limits is through a “safeword” - which ensures the bottom/submissive can end the activity at any given time with a single work or gesture.




2. These standards and guidelines only pertain to sexual expression between consenting adults. Children (anyone under 18) cannot give knowledgeable consent, and sexual acts between adults and children are illegal and cannot be condoned by the community.




3. Threats are not safe, sane or consensual. Threats can include actions and/or warnings that your property will be destroyed, or your children and/or pets will be hurt, or your partner threatens to kill you or commit suicide if you leave, or you are blackmailed or outed because of your involvement in diverse sexual practices.




4. Isolation and/or being prevented from retaining employment or obtaining higher education is not safe, sane or consensual. Emotions must be respected, including feelings of jealousy or dissatisfaction, and responsibility for what happens must be accepted and shared by each participant.
Guidelines
1. Use a safeword in order to make participants responsible to themselves and others.




2. Use negotiation, which often involves complex, lengthy communication, in order to make participants aware of each other’s limits, needs and desires.




3. Do not use scenes to express anger or frustration, or to manipulate or give unwanted punishment to one of the participants.
Consent must be judged by balancing the following criteria for each encounter at the time the acts occurred:


a. Was consent expressly denied or withdrawn?


b. Were there factors that negated the consent?


c. What is the relationship of the participants?


d. What was the nature of the activity?


e. What was the intent of the accused abuser?


Whether an individual’s SM role is top/dominant or bottom/submissive, they could be suffering abuse if they answer no to any of the following questions:


1. Are your needs and limits respected at all times?


2. Is your relationship built on honesty, trust, and respect?


3. Are you able to express feelings of guilt, jealousy, or unhappiness?
4. Can you function in everyday life?


5. Can you refuse to do illegal activities?


6. Can you insist on safe sex practices?


7. Does the relationship interfere with your interaction with family and friends?


8. Can you leave the situation without fearing that you will be harmed, and/or fearing the other participant(s) will harm themselves?


9. Can you exercise self-determination with money, employment, and life decisions?


10. Do you feel free to discuss your practices and feeling with anyone you choose?


11. Can you go wherever you want, whenever you want to?


12. Is your consent asked for or given?


13. Are you able to withdraw consent and stop what’s happening at any time?


14. Do you feel good after a scene?


I feel abusers should be held accountable for emotional and physical violence, and encourage survivors to seek support. Please contact the following resources - they have been educated about safe, sane and consensual sexual expression and will not be judgmental about your lifestyle:







Profile   Post #: 1
RE: SM vs Abuse - 10/28/2004 5:11:14 PM   
susannah


Posts: 79
Joined: 10/19/2004
Status: offline
Well, I thought this was wonderful, sub4hire. I think it's a great article!

While I don't consider myself as being abused, I am sure it happens - perception is reality, I think, between partners, and think this clarification is so good to have on the boards ( and generous of you to post).

For me, the second point under #4 is especially important, it's just "where I'm at" right now - I am not being prevented from employment or seeking formal academic schooling, but I do think any thinking between partners that may cause jealousy and resentment, long-term, will end up causing a problem.

I think a lot of "kinky sex actvity" between folks can be negotiated and if necessary re-negotiated (and my partner and I are thinking about a "contract" at this point), and I think as "kinky sex" activity between my partner and I develop, periodic re-negotiation is a good idea.

I think #10 is particularly important - feeling free to discuss your practices w/your partner (as well as seek information about bdsm activity in general - my partner encourages this, but I know some may feel restricted in this way (I could never be caged 24/7. That could change, I spose, and I know this "does it" for some folks as far as what they seek, but do have safety concerns about his for obvious reasons (potential fire - what could happen, etc.

So - I think #12 is key in a general sense, as far as folks living their interpretation of "the lifestyle."

I think your ending is cute: a blank(ha!) - very true. I think these are good general guidelines. -susannah

< Message edited by susannah -- 10/29/2004 5:46:01 AM >


_____________________________

" I had been my whole life a bell - and never knew it until at that moment I was lifted and struck".

- Annie Dillard (1945 - )

(in reply to sub4hire)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: SM vs Abuse - 10/29/2004 8:53:45 AM   
sub4hire


Posts: 6775
Joined: 1/1/2004
Status: offline
susannah,
Well I can't take full credit. As I stated a very good friend of mine re-wrote this. Then sent it to me asking if I thought anything needed to be changed...etc. Then after many month's someone stole his laptop with his only copy on it. So I was asked to re-produce it for him so to speak. I found it on my laptop the other day. Figured I'd add it here and there, "just in case" Happens again.
I do agree with him wholeheartedly. Then again, he knows that already. If anyone would like more info on the author just let me know. I'd post his name and e-mail here but, I'd hate to deluge him with mail if he doesn't want it.

(in reply to susannah)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: SM vs Abuse - 10/29/2004 10:40:32 PM   
lilninotchka


Posts: 121
Joined: 8/27/2004
Status: offline
This list of someone's personal opinions was voted on and declared 'winner' by receiving a majority vote that included the whole of the 'BDSM community' that it purports to represent?

If that is the case, i hereby resign from 'the BDSM Community', not because i disagree with the document's statements, but because i disagree with the idea that 'the BDSM community' requires someone to step up and protect us all in the form of a document that does not even begin to encompass all the wide and varied views, practices and ideals of those who identify as being part of 'the BDSM community'

(in reply to sub4hire)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: SM vs Abuse - 10/29/2004 11:39:00 PM   
susannah


Posts: 79
Joined: 10/19/2004
Status: offline
Well, of course. I think I may be being unclear (again hehe) - but the document already states that the author respects the diversity of the subculture, and that the person who wrote it also believes in preserving autonomy and humanity, (so I think she has 'that ground' covered as far as recognizing there will be diversity of opinion as far as how it may end up being interpreted - that is already a "given", at least the way I read it.

I think she posted it here because she is looking for Constructive suggestions, not endless debate about whether the document will actually end up ever being useful. I take for granted it will be (and maybe already has been). What would I change about it, re-phrase or add/subract? Gotta take more time to think about that -

I think there are so many folk who read this message board, that I hope folks toss in some specific statements they might change, or phrases they'd add, so the author can "build on it", hone it, rewrite it, etc. - I think that's why it was posted. There is nothing wrong w/debate, I don't think. But I don't think she is looking to "toss the baby out w/the bathwater" here - not her goal. I think she is looking for ideas re: Maybe what to add or subtract, and to post information for someone who may not know what the difference between SM & abuse actually is. If they don't and they see this article, maybe it will get them thinking about defining it in a personal way.

Any document is open to personal interpretation (as are all "cultural influences - television, newspapers, magazines, partners, friends, parents, siblings, and people interacting on a message board).

I think that is why God (or whoever created consciousness, fill in your own blank here____ , and this includes atheists, but I digress) I think that is why God made lawyers and other vocal debaters. Anyone who reads this article, whether or not they intend to use it - will have to apply it according to their own situation (including what their concept of what "the bdsm community" and "the life-style", etc. actually is for them). Let's hope there is room for a little self determination, and thinking for oneself in interpreting it, or even using the concept of "consensual" has just flown out the window. I still like it this article, and I don't think this article takes away from that concept, because each person determines what their own 'bdsm community' consists of.

There are people in abusive relationships out there. They exist (in and out of any bdsm relationship context). One can say it's "all in the eye of the beholder" - tell that to someone being thrown across a room and having their face smashed into a wall and having their nose broken, who is terrified to leave someone for fear of being stalked and/or killed. I've seen a few net articles where this kind of thing has happened, and it's an extreme example, but people talk about "red flags", and I see this document as just a general "go-by". Is abuse (extreme or other) 'business as usual' in any general conception of relationships in the 'bdsm community' for most folks? My guess is "no". But I think it can and does happen. How often? I don't know. But I think it does. So -

A resource- like this one is nice to have available for them. Thousands of folks read this collarme site - if it can help one person who may read this in a situation like that, I say it's a useful and good thing.

In a nutshell: I've seen similar documents. Actually I like this one BECAUSE it doesn't interpret it's assertions ad infinitum (therefore leaving things open for personal interpretation -which is good because everyone's situation is different).

When I look at just about any document, I consider how it might apply to me personally. Everyone's situation is different, and I think people can justify inside their own head ways to stay in a situation that is actually detrimental to their well-being. They can also see things like this document and start thinking about ways to leave an abusive relationship.

I think it's useful, based on experience, and that it's great as a reference in a general sense, and I think it's good to have here for people to view.

I think Gloria is looking for feedback. If I think of any more, (and I contemplate some things for days on end sometimes, I will e-mail in again).

I think it's fine, but I do hope she gets more feedback and constructive suggestions about what to maybe add, how to phrase something, if it would be helpful to people seeking how to tell the difference between bdsm and abuse, and how to seek help and end an abusive relationship.

**I do think, If anyone has any specific sites to add re: Where to seek help if they feel they are being abused in a bdsm relationship (support groups, crisis lines, etc. - I think that would be a wonderful addition. I don't, but I live in Nebraska and am unfamiliar w/most national resources, bdsm counselors, etc. (there are real live 'bdsm counselors' out there, I've heard).

Large bdsm organizations like the Black Rose Society, and maybe other bdsm organizations in larger cities I've heard, have some Very pro-active members who are also working and doing things like forming "support groups"' and crisis lines. Some people in these organizations may know where to find these folks (and their names could be added, to this document, as time goes on).

**My main thought, bottom line, about why I think it's valuable: It's good to have here for people to view.

**How it applies to them is their business. If any person feels some pressure as in feeling "brainwashed" by their conception of the bdsm community as a result of people around them, (including a partner) and feels it therefore might be "wrong" to seek help well - then I think that's an individualized problem, and they probably need to try to somehow find other acquaintances outside that particular 'bdsm community' for an alternative view of their situation. That in itself is "the red flag" to which lilnotchka may refer.

Or, they can get on the internet and look for differing viewpoints (if they have time, in-between the times they are ducking getting their teeth knocked out, that is). That's one reason it's important - you never know who is reading the collarme message boards, and having site refernces to other sites that define the difference between bdsm and abuse if a great idea.

It could help someone - which I like to think is the reason for the document in the first place (but your point might be one to add to this one, lilnotchka). I think I'd have to know more about someone's personal situation to be able to reach the conclusion that defining the difference for oneself in personal terms using documents has no value.

Consider this possibility:There are who people who are familiar with collarme.com as an information resource message board, and it may be where they get most of their information about bdsm, D/s and it defines for them, "the community".

Or, there are other message boards out there, but maybe this is the one they read most and are most familiar with, and have come to rely upon. I know others exist and I reference them, too, when I need information sometimes. But - people can become creatures of habit. If this is what they read most often, and are not looking in particular for opposing views, but only how it might help them in general terms, and can be specific and objective about how it fits their specific situation - I am glad it's here. Maybe even if they can't do that.

Why? Bottom line - it's possible it could end up saving a life, or alter the quality of one, in a good way. You never know who's reading, or what thery are doing with the information. And what they are doing with it could end up being a good thing, for them. Those are my "criteria." - susannah



< Message edited by susannah -- 11/1/2004 4:26:00 AM >


_____________________________

" I had been my whole life a bell - and never knew it until at that moment I was lifted and struck".

- Annie Dillard (1945 - )

(in reply to lilninotchka)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: SM vs Abuse - 10/30/2004 11:44:48 AM   
sub4hire


Posts: 6775
Joined: 1/1/2004
Status: offline
Actually I di d not write the draft. So, no I am not necessarily looking for opinions. I have no plans on changing something that is not mine.
I merely posted it. I never said I agree'd with it all. While I do agree with some, I don't agree with all. Make sense?
It is blatantly obvious even if it did fit me to a t, it is not going to fit everyone. Education is out there for people to obtain more power period. If you are educated you can take what you want and discard the rest. You learn that way. You also mold yourself into a better human being. You have choices then. It isn't just a, what I say goes mentality.

As a side note, a few board members from Black Rose are actually the authors. One is the major author the other two contributed.

For the record here are more of the same,

http://www.io.com/~ambrosio/abuse/


(in reply to susannah)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: SM vs Abuse - 10/30/2004 11:49:19 AM   
susannah


Posts: 79
Joined: 10/19/2004
Status: offline
Makes perfect sense to me, and I just think it's great it's posted here, Gloria.

I like that site reference you just tossed in - I think it's valuable reading.

There are so many folk who read these message boards w/experience, I hope more folks toss in their Constructive suggestions, 'cuz I saw you just "tossing the document out there" to list at collarme a post about differences between SM and abuse - to get a conversation going about defining the differences between SM & abuse;sort of looking for ways we could all discuss it from our own perspective, and you could pass it on, too, to give the guy you got it from food for thought to re-work it.

Different viewpoints and experiences on this topic are out there I am sure
from: Masters/slaves, subs/Doms/mes, bi-sexuals, transgenders, straight folk, lesbian and gay folk, in differing living situations.

If people who read this thread read what folks may write in here, and think, and maybe respond with their own comments, I think that makes the whole thread ever more valuable (and I think that's how they become educated as fas as using collarme for themselves).

If you get a lot of comments, and pass it on to him (the author), there may be some way you'd both like to alter it sometime (whether or not that happens, I think the topic is valuable. I think "passing it on", here or elsewhere, is a good concept altogether, as it applies to this thread topic.

I hope more folks write in, because I think these bits that are read on these posts here at collarme get "passed on", in more useful ways than some folk may imagine.

- susannah

< Message edited by susannah -- 11/1/2004 4:34:20 AM >


_____________________________

" I had been my whole life a bell - and never knew it until at that moment I was lifted and struck".

- Annie Dillard (1945 - )

(in reply to sub4hire)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: SM vs Abuse - 10/30/2004 1:52:40 PM   
Hawkins


Posts: 31
Joined: 10/14/2004
From: I'm English but I live in the Netherlands
Status: offline
quote:

Standards
1. The community operates under the creed of “Safe, Sane and Consensual” sexual expression.

A. “Safe” is being knowledgeable about the techniques and safety concerns involved in what you are doing. Each participant must be informed about the possible risks, both mental and physical.

B. “Sane” is knowing the difference between fantasy and reality. Knowledgeable consent cannot be given if you are under the influence of drugs or alcohol.


I personally find R.isk A.ware C.onsensual K.ink says it better for me. Just as 'Safer Sex' is more accurate than 'Safe Sex', and thus became common usage, so to is 'risk aware' a better a description than 'safe'.

I mean, cutting, branding, beating, bondage, breath control, water-sports, rimming... to me saying that is a selction of 'safe' activities is like saying fireworks are intrinsically safe.

Of course, fireworks are safer if you are risk aware.

Likewise, 'sane'. I know what you mean by 'sane' in lay-mans terms; but that is because I agree with you. Someone who disagreed with me might think it is 'in-sane' to do what I do. Leaving out consideration of what some people might accuse of us means we stand in our own right, not because others approve.

We should know what we are doing and want to do it. If we do others 'no harm' in the abusive sense of the word, then who is anyone to say whether it is right or wrong, sane or insane, in their opinion?



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Risk-aware_consensual_kink

(in reply to susannah)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: SM vs Abuse - 11/1/2004 4:32:16 AM   
susannah


Posts: 79
Joined: 10/19/2004
Status: offline
I think this is an excellent site reference you forwarded, Hawkins. Thanks for sending it in.



_____________________________

" I had been my whole life a bell - and never knew it until at that moment I was lifted and struck".

- Annie Dillard (1945 - )

(in reply to Hawkins)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: SM vs Abuse - 11/1/2004 8:48:10 AM   
GoddessJules


Posts: 549
Status: offline
This isn't directed to anyone in particular (including the person who started the thread.) I just didn't want to start a new thread regarding SM and "abuse."

I would like to qualify what I'm about to write with: I *do* believe that abuse takes place in AND out of our lifestyle. By no means am I trying to trivialize the experiences and trials of those that have experienced it. I find abusers disgusting and reprehensible and I do NOT condone their actions. With that being said, I believe that there is BIG TIME equivocation on the word "abuse." And that leads us to be callous, indifferent, and apathetic to REAL instances of abuse.

Just by reading some of these threads, you will find examples of people throwing around the word "abuse" when it isn't applicable. If a dom dumps you. . .that is NOT abuse no matter how you want to dress it up. If a dom violates your trust by saying he is single when he is not. . .it is NOT abuse. Someone not wanting to play with you because you are fat, black, blonde, ugly, smart, cute, green, giggly et al is NOT ABUSE!!!! It's life. Life isn't easy at times. If we sit here and let these people use the term abuse for these type of circumstances. . .it truly does trivialize those who experience unwanted torture, injury, or mental trauma.

If we that are on the "inside" can't distinguish between the pitfalls of life versu abuse. . . how can we expect those on the "outside" to?

Just my dollar (I'm not cheap so I won't give you all a mere two cents)


Jules

_____________________________

A pig's pussy is still pork, just like a bull's balls are still beef.
Click here to visit my site

(in reply to sub4hire)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: SM vs Abuse - 11/2/2004 4:06:38 PM   
Hawkins


Posts: 31
Joined: 10/14/2004
From: I'm English but I live in the Netherlands
Status: offline
GoddesJules:

Good point. It needs clarification. For me there are several factors.

First is the creed of the asshole.

You have straight vanilla assholes, you have gay assholes, you have BDSM assholes. In every walk of life, in and outside of sexuality, we have to learn to avoid people who do nasty things (unless they are the nasty things we want ).

Second, just as 'sane' is defined from a viewpoint, so too is 'abuse'. A set of weal-marks and bruises "to die for" might be some people's fondest wish. But if someone else saw it at the sauna, even if you did tell them you were fine with it (to say the least), they could well end up thinking it was 'abuse', no matter how wrong we know them to be.

For me abuse is the impositon of psychological control upon an unwilling party, or making someone fear for their safety or of reprisal if they terminated the relationship, and the use of physical force opon an unwilling person to coerce or intimidate them to obey, or the use of physical force that requires medical treatment.

But I'm sure I could pick holes in that, as I actually go on the 'seat of my pants' when deciding if it is abusive.

_____________________________

People living in glass paradigms shouldn't throw stones...

(in reply to GoddessJules)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: SM vs Abuse - 1/16/2007 10:00:11 PM   
MasterIntrepid


Posts: 1
Joined: 1/1/2004
Status: offline
Hello all,
   I am the one who wrote this sm vs abuse and I changed it from some others out there because I felt there was a need to based on my experiences.  It does not bother me that people disagree with it, but it does make them think.  Making people think was one of the goals as well as helping other recognize a bad situation or a potentially bad situation.  There are alot of new people who come into the scene and get told all sorts of nonsense and I hope they see it and learn from it.

Master Intrepid

[Mod Note:  email address removed]

< Message edited by ModeratorEleven -- 1/16/2007 10:04:51 PM >

(in reply to Hawkins)
Profile   Post #: 12
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Alternative Lifestyles in the News >> SM vs Abuse Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.078