RE: April 29, 1992 (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


lovmuffin -> RE: April 29, 1992 (4/29/2012 2:05:50 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

Didnt mean you specifically.... nor anyone on these boards specifically... but the rumbles are there, on various sites on line, and in the streets.



Yes but the thought of potential rioting has crossed my mind. Not necessarily over a racial thing but maybe something like food inflation (food riot not drawn so much along racial lines), who knows. And as one poster stated, maybe they'll get smart and burn up a more affluent neighborhood.




Mupainurpleasure -> RE: April 29, 1992 (4/29/2012 2:21:26 PM)




Those riots were borne of desperation in the 60s. You have to remember the images of church bombings, police dogs, foire hoses the conservative citizens coommittees, the stae was the active opressor Ol Lestor maddox.. In my lifetime we still had apartheid in this country. A situation that didnt occur in one city in one day but was institutionalized oppression in half the country. we also think slavery ended in 1865... look up the documentary Slavery by another name. Slavery slept for 30 yrs then came back in a new form for 50. The syphillis experiements in the south ran till the 70s a study worthy of nazis that treated humans like lab rats. I wouldnt expect people that were ok with that would ever stop being racist. National socialist state of Alabama The black experience inthis country is one of oppression till 40 yrs ago. thast kind of wound doesnt go away overnight. Anyone in the south has heard someone at one time going on about Yankees and Nyers and MA and hell that war is 160 yrs over. I think we have retreated on race. I here people say shit and challenge them on it they never would of said 20 yrs ago because pof peer judgement .




FatDomDaddy -> RE: April 29, 1992 (4/29/2012 3:43:13 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee
quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic

Could it happen again?

Yes.
There were riots in England just a few months ago.
Mob violence is an interesting phenomenon. It is easy to whip a group up into a frenzy. It is much more difficult to get them to stop.



Yes...

March 17, 2012.

Baltimore Authorities will not call it a hate crime... go figure

Black Mob Beats, Strips & Robs Tourist As Onlookers Laugh in Baltimore




Owner59 -> RE: April 29, 1992 (4/29/2012 4:32:47 PM)

Wait a minute here.......I thought we were supposed to be concerned about black on black crime........guess that didn`t last long........[8|]





Tho I`m sure the "law and order" types will bring us back there soon as it`s convenient......




DaddySatyr -> RE: April 29, 1992 (4/29/2012 4:34:52 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

Wait a minute here.......I thought we were supposed to be concerned about black on black crime........guess that didn`t last long........[8|]



We were concerned about it much longer than most of the MSM and the Jackson/Sharpton/Race-baitor types ever are.



Peace and comfort,



Michael




tazzygirl -> RE: April 29, 1992 (4/29/2012 10:01:27 PM)

I posted a picture of him on the previous page.




Owner59 -> RE: April 29, 1992 (4/29/2012 10:13:44 PM)

[:D]....Muah!




Owner59 -> RE: April 29, 1992 (4/29/2012 10:17:37 PM)

I`ll admit if it`s not already obvious but I don`t always keep up with every thread.




tazzygirl -> RE: April 29, 1992 (4/29/2012 10:36:25 PM)

LOL

Not obvious at all! [;)]




Hillwilliam -> RE: April 29, 1992 (4/30/2012 7:31:09 AM)

It's interesting that noone mentions what happened 12 years earlier on the other coast as a prelude to the LA riots.

http://www.miamibeach411.com/news/mcduffie-riots

As a side note, miami cops still call those big steel flashlights "McDuffie Sticks".

Nice folks huh?




Owner59 -> RE: April 29, 1992 (4/30/2012 9:35:05 AM)

Thanks for the link, Bill.




LizDeluxe -> RE: April 29, 1992 (4/30/2012 1:19:59 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic
Could it happen again?


I think it's going to be worse this time and much more widespread if Zimmerman is acquitted.

VH-1 is airing some show featuring hip hop and rap artists who actually try to justify the 1992 riots. Amazing.





LizDeluxe -> RE: April 29, 1992 (4/30/2012 1:25:20 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

While I would prefer it never happen again.. the riots... in this political era, I dont hold out much hope.



Good point........stock up on ammo.


I have been. A few boxes a month lately. Looking for some new more easily concealed iron, too.

It's coming. Get ready.






tazzygirl -> RE: April 29, 1992 (4/30/2012 2:23:28 PM)

Why are you worried, hon? Just flash those tits and you will be well protected. [;)]




Hillwilliam -> RE: April 29, 1992 (4/30/2012 3:58:59 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

Why are you worried, hon? Just flash those tits and you will be well protected. [;)]

Those arent His or her tits. They're on several porn sites.




Karmastic -> RE: April 29, 1992 (4/30/2012 4:04:39 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl
How is that different than the Boston Tea Party?


you answer your own question, sort of...

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl
Because its all about what they people perceive as fairness by government. The Tea Party was against the unfairness of taxes. The Watts riots.. again... perceived unfairness. The LA riots.. again... perceived unfairness. To be honest, I am surprised we did not have one in Pittsburgh over the case here. But I believe the FBI did a good job in their investigation and so did the people here.

The Watts riot had 34 deaths... the LA riots had 54 deaths. Definitely nothing to be taken lightly under any circumstances. I watched the Denny scene.. and felt so helpless that I cried. But what happens is that people do forget... they forget what isnt kept in the forefront. Many do not know, or remember, who helped Denny out that day. Many do not know that right down the street, after Denny was removed from the scene, that a hispanic male was almost killed as well. And that had it not been for a black preacher placing himself between the man and his attackers, he would have died as well.

Its a damn shame that these events had to happen before our government finally woke the hell up to make changes. What these events have in common is the unfair treatment of people by the government, for whatever reason. What makes the LA Riots different is that it was there... in black and white... on TV... no doubt as to what happened.. and the white cops (and one hispanic) were still found innocent.

We can expect people to take only so much. People dont forget... sadly, our government does it far too often. While I would prefer it never happen again.. the riots... in this political era, I dont hold out much hope.

your first post was kinda offensive. thank you for explaining the answer of why it was different. no one at the boston tea party savagely beat innocent people, and then used social injustice to justify their crimes against the very society they claimed to be demanding justice for. a total bunch of absurd ridiculous avoiding responsibility bull fucking shit; more victim da man's holding me down mentality that self perpetuates itself via piss poor victim attitudes.





lovmuffin -> RE: April 29, 1992 (4/30/2012 4:06:15 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

Why are you worried, hon? Just flash those tits and you will be well protected. [;)]

Those arent His or her tits. They're on several porn sites.



But non the less make a good avatar.




tazzygirl -> RE: April 29, 1992 (4/30/2012 4:45:10 PM)

quote:

your first post was kinda offensive. thank you for explaining the answer of why it was different. no one at the boston tea party savagely beat innocent people, and then used social injustice to justify their crimes against the very society they claimed to be demanding justice for. a total bunch of absurd ridiculous avoiding responsibility bull fucking shit; more victim da man's holding me down mentality that self perpetuates itself via piss poor victim attitudes.


I did answer my own question... no sort of about it. Offensive? Perhaps... a thick skin can be required around here. But, I made no mistake. The principles that this country were founded upon went away a long time ago, starting even before the Tea Party. It simmers for a while, then boils over.... we have had many boiling points, I only mentioned a few. And each are escalating.

And, you know, its easy to spout the "victim mentality" when you aren't one yourself. Were they all victims? Nope.. some were. Were they all ignored? yes, for the most part they were. Did things change afterwards? Some... probably not enough.

Shall I also remind you that this country was built upon a citizen revolt? One where the citizens got tired of their government misrepresenting them, abusing them and ignoring them? Do you not also recall that happened again during the Civil War here?

Instead of berating these people, why not berate your government for ignoring its constituents and betraying their trust? I dont have to like the fact that there are victims... but I will be damned if I will look people in the eyes who lived there and tell them they were wrong.




Mupainurpleasure -> RE: April 29, 1992 (4/30/2012 7:54:44 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

quote:

your first post was kinda offensive. thank you for explaining the answer of why it was different. no one at the boston tea party savagely beat innocent people, and then used social injustice to justify their crimes against the very society they claimed to be demanding justice for. a total bunch of absurd ridiculous avoiding responsibility bull fucking shit; more victim da man's holding me down mentality that self perpetuates itself via piss poor victim attitudes.


I did answer my own question... no sort of about it. Offensive? Perhaps... a thick skin can be required around here. But, I made no mistake. The principles that this country were founded upon went away a long time ago, starting even before the Tea Party. It simmers for a while, then boils over.... we have had many boiling points, I only mentioned a few. And each are escalating.

And, you know, its easy to spout the "victim mentality" when you aren't one yourself. Were they all victims? Nope.. some were. Were they all ignored? yes, for the most part they were. Did things change afterwards? Some... probably not enough.

Shall I also remind you that this country was built upon a citizen revolt? One where the citizens got tired of their government misrepresenting them, abusing them and ignoring them? Do you not also recall that happened again during the Civil War here?

Instead of berating these people, why not berate your government for ignoring its constituents and betraying their trust? I dont have to like the fact that there are victims... but I will be damned if I will look people in the eyes who lived there and tell them they were wrong.

Actually it wasnt as just or grand but we won !!
quote:

Tea Act of 1773 was designed to prop up the East India Company which was floundering financially and burdened with eighteen million pounds of unsold tea. This tea was to be shipped directly to the colonies, and sold at a bargain price. The direct sale of tea via British agents would undercut the business of local North American merchants. Profits now went into the East India Company, not American hands
People think it was expensive tea that was the issue. It was american business interests being undercut by cheap tea. http://users.humboldt.edu/ogayle/hist110/unit2/revolution.html In the end they forced us but it's hardly fair to say a goverment that was taxing it's colonies at a lower rate than the motherland is hardly oppressive. We have always hated taxes




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875