Karmastic
Posts: 1650
Joined: 4/5/2012 From: Los Angeles Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: DarkSteven This article (http://www.denverpost.com/news/ci_20518191/new-dna-evidence-clears-robert-dewey-1994-grand) gives much more information. Evidently he was convicted due to a bloody shirt he unfortunately happened to have at the time he was interviewed. It's shocking that he was convicted of murder based on nothing else. There's an inference that the jury was out for blood, and that the evidence wasn't suppressed, but that the jury simply convicted him on very little. hmm, thanks very much for this. i wondered too but was too lazy to investigate. seems like they didn't actually match the blood on dewey's shirt to taylor the victim. in summary, they fucked up the evidence, and the jury was hot to trot. "Joffe had original samples of blood found on one of Dewey's work shirts in 1994 retested. At the time, the blood was thought to be that of 19-year-old victim Jacie Taylor. New DNA work showed it belonged to Dewey alone." "A DNA specialist opined at trial that evidence linking the blood on Dewey's shirt to Taylor — and 45 percent of the Caucasian population — should never have been admitted." "Evidence problems plagued Dewey's 1996 trial." "Mr. Dewey's case seemed to be one where someone was convicted because a jury wanted to blame someone,"
_____________________________
[Awaiting Approval] If my experience level makes you feel superior, that is your problem, not mine.
|