dcnovice
Posts: 37282
Joined: 8/2/2006 Status: offline
|
FR I'm not a great fan of arguing by analogy, in large part because the choice of image/comparison can be, as I think it is here, as distracting as it is illuminating. I could see if one had brought up, say, the boy who cried wolf, but turning the dial all the way to a serial rapist seems extreme--and also counterproductive, in that it totally overshadows the original point. Kirata, Ralikun: You both strike me as straight shooters, so I'll count on you to level with me. If a liberal poster had used the same image in discussing whether a conservative columnist's statistics were valid, would you have accepted it as an apt analogy? A fair comparison? In terms of the general P&R reaction in such an instance, my guess is that the analogy would have been cited as an example of the "demonization" tactics that the left learned at Alinsky's knee. I know dwelling on the aptness (or not) of an analogy may seem like a fine point, but that very linguistic nuance just led to the resignation, under no small amount of pressure from the right, of an EPA official.
_____________________________
No matter how cynical you become, it's never enough to keep up. JANE WAGNER, THE SEARCH FOR SIGNS OF INTELLIGENT LIFE IN THE UNIVERSE
|