dcnovice
Posts: 37282
Joined: 8/2/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
That's because the rules he wrote, are the rules in play. That point surfaces regularly here in P&R, but I don't buy it. Even a modest glance at American history reveals our breathtaking gift for polarization and demonization--often vicious, sometimes violent--long before Alinsky came along. Preston Brooks and Charles Sumner were positively savage in their attacks on one another, which culminated in Brooks's beating Sumner with a cane on the Senate floor in 1854. Admirers sent congratulatory canes to Brooks, including one inscribed "Good job," while Sumner spent the next three years recovering from his injuries. The idea that American politics was all sweetness, light, and principled discussion of substantive issues prior to Alinsky cannot, to borrow from Justice Scalia, "be taken seriously." I'm also skeptical of the way Alinsky tends to get invoked as a "Get out of jail free" card. A billboard compares environmentalists to mass murderers or a prominent radio presence brands a young woman a "slut," to take two recent examples, and out comes Alinsky to show that "they" did it first. I can't help thinking of my brothers, racing to the car as Mom pulled into the driveway after work so that each could first the first to yell, "He started it." Finally, Alinsky's been dead for 40 years now. Is anyone still reading him? How widespread is his influence among folks today, particularly given that most Americans alive may never even have heard of him? Might it be time to let the old boy rest in peace and take adult responsibility, on both sides of the aisle, for our own actions?
_____________________________
No matter how cynical you become, it's never enough to keep up. JANE WAGNER, THE SEARCH FOR SIGNS OF INTELLIGENT LIFE IN THE UNIVERSE
|