RE: GOP Newsletter Calls for Armed Revolution if Obama Re-Elected (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


thompsonx -> RE: GOP Newsletter Calls for Armed Revolution if Obama Re-Elected (5/10/2012 9:33:35 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: cuckoldmepls

Btw, the latest 2 treasonous acts that I have seen are allowing Chinese bridge contractors to take our jobs here in the states & they are now allowing a Chinese bank to take over one of our banks. Just the beginning I'm sure.



Wallmart sells chinese products. Is that treason?
In your conservative world is it appropriate for the government to tell capitalist who they can hire?




SternSkipper -> RE: GOP Newsletter Calls for Armed Revolution if Obama Re-Elected (5/10/2012 9:38:15 AM)

quote:

This is absurd. OWS is the group that is openly promoting violence and anarchy hoping that it will lead to a violent revolution. They were even planning on blowing up a bridge in Cleveland.

As opposed to the Tea Party which actively promotes a political revolution. NO significant numbers of Tea party members have been arrested and in fact, I haven't heard of any.


Besides being bullshit... you're walking away from a history of Tea Party punks roughing people up, showing up with racist hater collateral to their rallies, and even instances of Tea Party, and now? What? Threatened assassinations? I suggest you fix things in El Dorado before you go mouthing off about the rest of us.




Hillwilliam -> RE: GOP Newsletter Calls for Armed Revolution if Obama Re-Elected (5/10/2012 9:50:41 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: cuckoldmepls

Btw, the latest 2 treasonous acts that I have seen are allowing Chinese bridge contractors to take our jobs here in the states & they are now allowing a Chinese bank to take over one of our banks. Just the beginning I'm sure.

The first treasonous act I ever saw concerning the Chinese was awarding them "Most Favored Nation trading status" right after they assured us that they never machine gunned their own citizens.[8|]




GotSteel -> RE: GOP Newsletter Calls for Armed Revolution if Obama Re-Elected (5/10/2012 10:06:33 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle
Spin it which ever way you please, calls for "armed revolution" are sedition. Sedition is a crime and a gravely serious crime at that. Partisan defences diminish those who make them. We can all imagine the shreiks of self righteous outrage coming from the GOP and other "law'n'order' fetishists if the sedition came from a source that was black, or Muslim, or a member of any minority/marginalised group.


[sm=goodpost.gif]




Mupainurpleasure -> RE: GOP Newsletter Calls for Armed Revolution if Obama Re-Elected (5/10/2012 10:21:57 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


quote:

ORIGINAL: cuckoldmepls

Btw, the latest 2 treasonous acts that I have seen are allowing Chinese bridge contractors to take our jobs here in the states & they are now allowing a Chinese bank to take over one of our banks. Just the beginning I'm sure.



Wallmart sells chinese products. Is that treason?
In your conservative world is it appropriate for the government to tell capitalist who they can hire?


no, but i think the fact the pay their employees to little to live on then we have to pay the difference is a real argument for raising the minimumwage. Why should a company making half a billion in profits be allowed to saddle taxpayers with part of their employee wages?




itsSIRtou -> RE: GOP Newsletter Calls for Armed Revolution if Obama Re-Elected (5/10/2012 10:24:17 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

Would you hazard a guess how much of a chance 10,000 armed insurrectionist would have against a rifle company (120 men+2 officers)of marines




As the son of a 27 year military Man of the US (army & Navy) and know what I do about the Marines.... My money would be on the Marine Rifle Company to win.




Mupainurpleasure -> RE: GOP Newsletter Calls for Armed Revolution if Obama Re-Elected (5/10/2012 10:25:03 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: cuckoldmepls

This is absurd. OWS is the group that is openly promoting violence and anarchy hoping that it will lead to a violent revolution. They were even planning on blowing up a bridge in Cleveland.

As opposed to  the Tea Party which actively promotes a political revolution. NO significant numbers of Tea party members have been arrested and in fact, I haven't heard of any.

You know 30 yrs ago old timers were saying 'you watch, someday there will be a revolution.' However, they never dreamed there would be an attempt to launch a revolution in favor of more government.


gee google tea party arrests and walla Of course OWS makes it ok to call for the murder of a senator by a tea partier and tea partiers never reference armed resistance and seccession right?




Zonie63 -> RE: GOP Newsletter Calls for Armed Revolution if Obama Re-Elected (5/10/2012 10:25:10 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

quote:

Well, if we're guessing here, then I would guess that some of those 10,000 insurrectionists could conceivably be ex-military who could train the others in military tactics.


Most knowledgible military folks will agree that it takes a minimum of two years to train a rifleman. Considerably more for command staff. For an officer to attend the "war college" or "staff college" requires about ten or twelve years from comissioning.
If you are familiar with the "bay of pigs" invasion, the training (done clandestinly in mexico)took more than two years. They hit the beach with the best of the best amphibious assault vehicles available at the time. They were led by a marine corp lt col. and had hundreds of veterans as part of the assault force. They never got off the beach. They never had a prayer against a real army. Just as the colonist never had a prayer against the britts but for the professional help they got from folks like mercer,lafayette etal. The artillery supplied by spain through the neherlands. And of course their greatest ally was the britt preoccupation with europe.


Since you mention Cuba, I seem to recall reading that, in the Battle of Santa Clara, Che Guevara was outnumbered 10:1 with a ragtag band of revolutionaries against a real army. How do you explain that?

quote:

quote:

Guessing even further, it's conceivable that some of those Marines might have friends or family members among the insurrectionists, so they might have divided loyalties and sympathies.


Perhaps you could tell us how many times since their inception in 1798 the marines have mutnied?


I don't think any of the military services have ever mutinied, although quite a few of their members joined the Confederacy during the Civil War.

quote:

quote:

Military people are not robots. They have hearts and minds, too.


Might want to check into a place called cam ne...or better yet samar. Their hearts and minds are oriented to unit,corp, country, everything else is a target of opportunity.


You're talking about military actions in Asia, not in America. Big difference. If their hearts and minds are oriented to unit, corp, and country, then it should be noted that America is THEIR country and Americans are their countrymen.

Some of the most revolutionary people I've known were ex-military. I knew one guy who had served as a Seabee in Vietnam who had quite the revolutionary mindset, although more right-wing than left-wing. He was quite an influence on me when I was younger. His political views might have gotten him called an "anti-government wing-nut" by some, but I thought he was a decent and honorable man who cared deeply about his country and the direction it was taking.

My closest friend of 20 years is also ex-military. He went to DLI to study Russian, and his job in the Army was that of interrogator. He also has highly unconventional views on a lot of different subjects, and he's certainly no robot either. He has a chronic illness and sometimes I drive him down to the VA hospital, where I've come across quite a number of vets who are not exactly what I would call mindless conformists, which is what you seem to be implying here. Some might lean towards the right, while others might lean towards the left, but I don't think it's as black-and-white as you think it is.









Zonie63 -> RE: GOP Newsletter Calls for Armed Revolution if Obama Re-Elected (5/10/2012 10:33:40 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


quote:

ORIGINAL: Zonie63


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

quote:

Yes, but you'd think that people who consider themselves the elite in their society would have been smart enough to be able to figure it out before their government was overthrown.


Why would one expect something that has never happened in the history of the world to suddenly happen because they asked for it to happen?


Could you rephrase the question, please? What is the "something" you're referring to that has never happened in the history of the world?

Where the power structure gave up any or all of it's power to those it ruled voluntarily as opposed to having it taken from them.
I can only think of one...when brazil seperated from portugal.



One could argue that the civil rights reforms of the 1950s and 60s was an example of government being flexible enough to make reforms without waiting until the government was on the verge of being overthrown. If they were intransigent like other governments have been, they could have just maintained the status quo until the cities exploded.

Another example might be Nixon's impeachment. If Nixon had chosen to use his power as commander-in-chief of the military to keep himself in power, then things might have gone quite differently.




Zonie63 -> RE: GOP Newsletter Calls for Armed Revolution if Obama Re-Elected (5/10/2012 10:36:42 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

quote:

quote:

quote:


He only won because a greater percentage of the country was against McCain.



How presumptious of you to pretend to know why someone did not vote the way you wanted them to.

quote:

How do you know which way I wanted them to vote? Talk about presumptuous.



I said "pretend to know" not "wanted".
the answer is in the first line of this post....duuuhhhh




But you did say "wanted" in your previous post, and here, you're saying it again. I highlighted in red above, just in case you forgot what you wrote.





BamaD -> RE: GOP Newsletter Calls for Armed Revolution if Obama Re-Elected (5/10/2012 10:38:02 AM)

Keep in mind that Obama has demanded that any leader faced with an uprising step down (see mideast).




Mupainurpleasure -> RE: GOP Newsletter Calls for Armed Revolution if Obama Re-Elected (5/10/2012 10:47:16 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

Keep in mind that Obama has demanded that any leader faced with an uprising step down (see mideast).

Oh you can't actually believe that was what he siad? i can't believe you could be so partisan as to believe that tripe. ZKeep in miond when you rise against a legally elected goverment we'll be cheering in damn yankeeville when the fire hoses and the dogs get set loose in Alabama this time [;)] and rthe army will suppress any rebellion without hesitation because it is the best most professinal army in the world and despite Briebarts claim they'd join in they are true to civil command and democratic instotutions not thuggery....yeah anothr shining light of the right briebart was if lying, a nd bullying and such are your thing




mnottertail -> RE: GOP Newsletter Calls for Armed Revolution if Obama Re-Elected (5/10/2012 10:47:37 AM)

You might come up with some sort of credible citation of that pure line of asswipe.
It appears that you are profoundly deficient in history and current events.  





thompsonx -> RE: GOP Newsletter Calls for Armed Revolution if Obama Re-Elected (5/10/2012 10:56:26 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Mupainurpleasure


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


quote:

ORIGINAL: cuckoldmepls

Btw, the latest 2 treasonous acts that I have seen are allowing Chinese bridge contractors to take our jobs here in the states & they are now allowing a Chinese bank to take over one of our banks. Just the beginning I'm sure.



Wallmart sells chinese products. Is that treason?
In your conservative world is it appropriate for the government to tell capitalist who they can hire?


no, but i think the fact the pay their employees to little to live on then we have to pay the difference is a real argument for raising the minimumwage. Why should a company making half a billion in profits be allowed to saddle taxpayers with part of their employee wages?



If you use the search function put in my name and a topic like minimum wage...if you would like to see my position on that.




Mupainurpleasure -> RE: GOP Newsletter Calls for Armed Revolution if Obama Re-Elected (5/10/2012 10:56:42 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Zonie63

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


quote:

ORIGINAL: Zonie63


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

quote:

Yes, but you'd think that people who consider themselves the elite in their society would have been smart enough to be able to figure it out before their government was overthrown.


Why would one expect something that has never happened in the history of the world to suddenly happen because they asked for it to happen?


Could you rephrase the question, please? What is the "something" you're referring to that has never happened in the history of the world?

Where the power structure gave up any or all of it's power to those it ruled voluntarily as opposed to having it taken from them.
I can only think of one...when brazil seperated from portugal.



One could argue that the civil rights reforms of the 1950s and 60s was an example of government being flexible enough to make reforms without waiting until the government was on the verge of being overthrown. If they were intransigent like other governments have been, they could have just maintained the status quo until the cities exploded.

Another example might be Nixon's impeachment. If Nixon had chosen to use his power as commander-in-chief of the military to keep himself in power, then things might have gone quite differently.


Nah our army first fealty is the constitution they wouldnt of supported a coupe. We have the most professional army in the world saying they would denigrtes them. Nxon was toast with or without Watergate. If not for watergate they would of briught charges for his falsoification of tax records to avoid taxes. he didnt just not pay he forged docuemtns to avoid paying hard to claim that was a mistake




Mupainurpleasure -> RE: GOP Newsletter Calls for Armed Revolution if Obama Re-Elected (5/10/2012 10:57:55 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


quote:

ORIGINAL: Mupainurpleasure


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


quote:

ORIGINAL: cuckoldmepls

Btw, the latest 2 treasonous acts that I have seen are allowing Chinese bridge contractors to take our jobs here in the states & they are now allowing a Chinese bank to take over one of our banks. Just the beginning I'm sure.



Wallmart sells chinese products. Is that treason?
In your conservative world is it appropriate for the government to tell capitalist who they can hire?


no, but i think the fact the pay their employees to little to live on then we have to pay the difference is a real argument for raising the minimumwage. Why should a company making half a billion in profits be allowed to saddle taxpayers with part of their employee wages?



If you use the search function put in my name and a topic like minimum wage...if you would like to see my position on that.

Oh I wasnt inferring a position just pointing out the real crime they commit is making taxpayers pay their workers




thompsonx -> RE: GOP Newsletter Calls for Armed Revolution if Obama Re-Elected (5/10/2012 10:59:00 AM)

quote:

Since you mention Cuba, I seem to recall reading that, in the Battle of Santa Clara, Che Guevara was outnumbered 10:1 with a ragtag band of revolutionaries against a real army. How do you explain that?


Perhaps if you were to read the after action reports you would understand.




Zonie63 -> RE: GOP Newsletter Calls for Armed Revolution if Obama Re-Elected (5/10/2012 11:05:10 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

quote:

Since you mention Cuba, I seem to recall reading that, in the Battle of Santa Clara, Che Guevara was outnumbered 10:1 with a ragtag band of revolutionaries against a real army. How do you explain that?


Perhaps if you were to read the after action reports you would understand.


The result speaks for itself.




thompsonx -> RE: GOP Newsletter Calls for Armed Revolution if Obama Re-Elected (5/10/2012 11:08:18 AM)

quote:

You're talking about military actions in Asia, not in America. Big difference. If their hearts and minds are oriented to unit, corp, and country, then it should be noted that America is THEIR country and Americans are their countrymen.


I am talking about how marines do business. They do that business where ever they are.
I have first hand knowledge of one such action in oxford miss. when james meridith went to old miss over the objections of ross barnet the gov of miss.
There were three in the hospital and one in the morgue...none were marines.


quote:

Some of the most revolutionary people I've known were ex-military.


Yet you question my service[8|]



I knew one guy who had served as a Seabee in Vietnam who had quite the revolutionary mindset, although more right-wing than left-wing. He was quite an influence on me when I was younger. His political views might have gotten him called an "anti-government wing-nut" by some, but I thought he was a decent and honorable man who cared deeply about his country and the direction it was taking.

My closest friend of 20 years is also ex-military. He went to DLI to study Russian, and his job in the Army was that of interrogator. He also has highly unconventional views on a lot of different subjects, and he's certainly no robot either. He has a chronic illness and sometimes I drive him down to the VA hospital, where I've come across quite a number of vets who are not exactly what I would call mindless conformists, which is what you seem to be implying here. Some might lean towards the right, while others might lean towards the left, but I don't think it's as black-and-white as you think it is.

I was not suggesting that marines were robots. I am convinced that they would fire on insurgents just as the army (national guard) fired on the students at kent state.
If it had been marines at kent state there would have been no bloodshed...marines know the meaning of fire discipline.
Had the students at kent state been armed insurgents seeking the violent overthrow of the u.s. govt. then there would have been bloodshed.




Zonie63 -> RE: GOP Newsletter Calls for Armed Revolution if Obama Re-Elected (5/10/2012 11:14:31 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Mupainurpleasure


quote:

ORIGINAL: Zonie63

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


quote:

ORIGINAL: Zonie63


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

quote:

Yes, but you'd think that people who consider themselves the elite in their society would have been smart enough to be able to figure it out before their government was overthrown.


Why would one expect something that has never happened in the history of the world to suddenly happen because they asked for it to happen?


Could you rephrase the question, please? What is the "something" you're referring to that has never happened in the history of the world?

Where the power structure gave up any or all of it's power to those it ruled voluntarily as opposed to having it taken from them.
I can only think of one...when brazil seperated from portugal.



One could argue that the civil rights reforms of the 1950s and 60s was an example of government being flexible enough to make reforms without waiting until the government was on the verge of being overthrown. If they were intransigent like other governments have been, they could have just maintained the status quo until the cities exploded.

Another example might be Nixon's impeachment. If Nixon had chosen to use his power as commander-in-chief of the military to keep himself in power, then things might have gone quite differently.


Nah our army first fealty is the constitution they wouldnt of supported a coupe. We have the most professional army in the world saying they would denigrtes them. Nxon was toast with or without Watergate. If not for watergate they would of briught charges for his falsoification of tax records to avoid taxes. he didnt just not pay he forged docuemtns to avoid paying hard to claim that was a mistake


Well, we'll never know now, because Nixon never did it. He resigned and went back to private life and eventually became respected as an elder statesman. But he had people like G. Gordon and J. Edgar in his camp, along with General Alexander Haig. These weren't exactly choir boys or Dudley Do-Rights, so anything was possible. I'm not denigrating the military at all, but I also know that the military are made of human beings, not robots. To suggest otherwise would be denigrating them, in my opinion.




Page: <<   < prev  6 7 [8] 9 10   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0625