Anaxagoras -> RE: So who is sick of high gas prices? (5/17/2012 1:17:21 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Real0ne quote:
ORIGINAL: Anaxagoras with some practical innovations of his own which allowed his system of AC to succeed over the less efficient DC system. Which under more congenial circumstances I suppose I would have given you a gold star for correcting at least 1/2 of YOUR ERROR which I let slide even though I was being attacked by complete jackassed bullshit. Awww, how very generous you are. Sadly (sucks to be you) its all true. Tesla also helped develop the AC motor at the same time which helped boost popularity for his AC system. ----------- quote:
quote:
ORIGINAL: Anaxagoras The experiments were explained by static electricity as is very fucking well known. Which is an area we can certainly pursue next and pound yet another wooden stake in your black heart since static electricity is not known to be tellurric. OOps did I let the cat otta the bag, sorry. Here you are again about this telluric transmitter nonsense. I showed with a number of quotes including one from Tesla himself, that the power is transmitted into the atmosphere. ------------- quote:
quote:
ORIGINAL: Anaxagoras Neither do they indicate such a thing as free energy or long distance energy transmission, when you dishonestly try to make out that they do. and last time I checked you pay NOTHING for the sunlight that keeps you and this planet warm, which is unequivocally free, again showing your dishonesty regarding energy. This is the classic R0 stroke, he just keeps repeating things again and again that were fully addressed. The sun is still an energy source, it does not violate energy in-out principles which you pretend can be achieved with Tesla's system. Your fruity definition of free power doesn't fit solar power: (a) it needs a substantive power source - i.e. the Sun (b) it's not a technology used for mass supply yet that can be greatly improved at no cost (c) the science behind solar power is accepted http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_energy_suppression quote:
In this context, the term "free energy" is not well-defined, and should not be confused with thermodynamic free energy. Generally, it is used to refer to purported transformative technologies which have the potential to dramatically reduce personal energy costs with relatively little capital investment. There have been numerous free energy claims over the years.[1] Many, such as those implying perpetual motion or those based on extracting zero-point energy, are viewed as impossible according to accepted physical laws.[2] Others, such as cold fusion, while not fundamentally impossible, are not accepted as established by the scientific community. Conspiracy advocates therefore claim that the scientific community has controlled and suppressed research into alternative avenues of energy production via the institutions of peer review.[3] ----------- quote:
quote:
ORIGINAL: Anaxagoras You were claiming there is such a way of creating free energy from no source. Then you tell a complete bold faced lie by claiming something I would never claim in the terms you use it and of course you do not quote it so everyone can see your dishonesty first hand when there is NO SUCH THING as free energy in the terms you just stated and I never stated or implied such a thing. That is purely a creation and demonstration of your fertile dishonesty. You are one of those very conspiracists who claims there is such a thing as free energy. You never asked me to quote you so I didn't but if others want proof then R0's statements of "gubermint" conspiracism suppressing free energy proves he is a free-energy loon, e.g. when R0 stated in post 22: http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=4118118 quote:
couple hundred watts and a coil the size of a beer keg and I could talk to all my jolly ole friends in the uk at pennies per day 24/7 no weather interference or loss of signal ever. Of course governments are not real happy about people talking to each other for nearly free across the world especially when they are getting lined up for a wold war. ---------------- quote:
Then the icing on the cake as if a little dishonesty is not enough, AFTER I POINT OUT THE HARD LINE DISTINCTION to MM in my above post between "practical" and "efficient" stating that it is PRACTICAL and the present AC system has nothing to do with TRANSMISSION EFFICIENCY over Edison you move your goal posts once again and claim you were right all along. I didn't move the goal posts. I simply restated my position. It is you who has been dancing a jig by rejecting what I said about transmission efficiency, and now talking about practicality, when practicality in terms of infrastructure was a significant part of what I meant by transmission efficiency. Before you pretend I changed the goal posts again, I made this explicit ages ago: http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=4119749 quote:
the AC system allowed the use of high voltage transmission while Edison's DC system did not. High voltage, low current transmission allowed far smaller conductors to be used for a given level of power. Moreover, DC was limited in its application for industrial use and required far more stations to generate power over shorter distances. ------------ quote:
quote:
ORIGINAL: Anaxagoras No R0 it isn't easy to derive the wrong impression of what is being said as neither sounds like they're saying AC or DC signals are implicitly more efficient than the other. Its clearly an issue of practicality, and efficiency of application. and before you piss your pants again and move those goal posts and expand your definitions to include the whole fucking universe, YOU SAID: quote:
ORIGINAL: Anaxagoras Its very well known Tesla's AC system was more efficient at the transmission of electricity than the competing DC system. Thats partly why it won out. WRONG Edison's system required small generating plants every one to two miles, and copper wiring at a substantially larger scale than the high voltage, low current system of Tesla's. Did not make TRANSMISSION more efficient. The tower does that. The fact you misunderstood such a basic point made over several pages shows you didn't even know the basics about Tesla's AC. Either way its not to see you admit your error Now you're strawmanning again. We were talking about Tesla's AC system which became the accepted system of electricity transmission. Now you're pretending that we were talking about his wireless transmission system. "Transmission" as a word isn't merely the sending of signals wirelessly. It also includes wired mediums - the context I clearly used. Your strawmanning knows no bounds. You should get into the Guinness Book of Records. [sm=applause.gif] ---------------- quote:
you claim I have a predisposition to asses generally and that is not the case. Just certain asses. I mentioned your predisposition to asses because you kept talking about asses. You also referred to men getting fucked quite a bit on the truther threads etc. so your image (edited out) of a giant destructive cock is positively Freudian [sorry BTW if it offends your sensibilities to mention a Jew]. Again I have to say you have serious serious issues! [:D]
|
|
|
|