Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Atheists more compassionate than believers, study finds


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Atheists more compassionate than believers, study finds Page: <<   < prev  2 3 4 [5] 6   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Atheists more compassionate than believers, study f... - 5/17/2012 5:44:35 PM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: fucktoyprincess
Actually it is if they are trying to convert them and they refuse to be converted. At least that's what some religions believe. So perspective is everything.


Indeed. And the monks who wrote Malleus Maleficarum weren't a pair of evil shits who vindicated the torturers of the Inquisition. Actually, they were just compassionate people who advocated "enhanced soul-salvation techniques".


_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to fucktoyprincess)
Profile   Post #: 81
RE: Atheists more compassionate than believers, study f... - 5/17/2012 7:42:47 PM   
MasterSlaveLA


Posts: 3991
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: fucktoyprincess

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

Would it be fair to say that murdering people isn't a compassionate thing to do?


Actually it is if they are trying to convert them and they refuse to be converted. At least that's what some religions believe. So perspective is everything.



I'm assuming your'e referring to Islam... but I thought the radical element advocates murder/killing of those who LEAVE Islam, and not necessarily those who merely refuse Islam?!!  But I could be wrong... haven't really studied up on Islam?!!



_____________________________

It's only kinky the first time!!!

(in reply to fucktoyprincess)
Profile   Post #: 82
RE: Atheists more compassionate than believers, study f... - 5/18/2012 5:49:38 AM   
fucktoyprincess


Posts: 2337
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterSlaveLA

quote:

ORIGINAL: fucktoyprincess

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

Would it be fair to say that murdering people isn't a compassionate thing to do?


Actually it is if they are trying to convert them and they refuse to be converted. At least that's what some religions believe. So perspective is everything.



I'm assuming your'e referring to Islam... but I thought the radical element advocates murder/killing of those who LEAVE Islam, and not necessarily those who merely refuse Islam?!!  But I could be wrong... haven't really studied up on Islam?!!




Read up on the history of the Christian churches, too. Maybe start with the Spanish Inquisition....


_____________________________

~ ftp

(in reply to MasterSlaveLA)
Profile   Post #: 83
RE: Atheists more compassionate than believers, study f... - 5/18/2012 6:01:07 AM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
You could also read up on the atheist Pol Pot or maybe the atheist governments in the fromer Soviet Union and Communist China.

(in reply to fucktoyprincess)
Profile   Post #: 84
RE: Atheists more compassionate than believers, study f... - 5/18/2012 6:17:21 AM   
fucktoyprincess


Posts: 2337
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer


quote:

ORIGINAL: fucktoyprincess
Actually it is if they are trying to convert them and they refuse to be converted. At least that's what some religions believe. So perspective is everything.


Indeed. And the monks who wrote Malleus Maleficarum weren't a pair of evil shits who vindicated the torturers of the Inquisition. Actually, they were just compassionate people who advocated "enhanced soul-salvation techniques".



"Enhanced Soul-Salvation Techniques"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uprjmoSMJ-o

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFyuhTwi_OE&feature=related

_____________________________

~ ftp

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 85
RE: Atheists more compassionate than believers, study f... - 5/18/2012 6:26:28 AM   
tweakabelle


Posts: 7522
Joined: 10/16/2007
From: Sydney Australia
Status: offline
The
quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

You could also read up on the atheist Pol Pot or maybe the atheist governments in the fromer Soviet Union and Communist China.
.

Not this ridiculous false equivalence again. The victims of the Inquisition and other religious horrors were killed for religious reasons by religious people acting in the name of their religion and authorised by the relevant religious authorities . The reasons why Pol Pot and other Marxist regimes murdered their citizens had nothing to do with their atheism. Their actions were motivated by their political philosophy (such as it was). There is no equivalence.

Blaming atheism for these murders is as absurd as blaming all Italians for the activities of Al Capone.

< Message edited by tweakabelle -- 5/18/2012 6:28:22 AM >


_____________________________



(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 86
RE: Atheists more compassionate than believers, study f... - 5/18/2012 6:34:43 AM   
fucktoyprincess


Posts: 2337
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

You could also read up on the atheist Pol Pot or maybe the atheist governments in the fromer Soviet Union and Communist China.


I am atheist and also support freedom of religion. It is possible to be both. Atheism only means I don't believe in god. And that is all the term atheism means. Nothing more. It is not tied to a particular political ideology, and it is not tied to prejudices.

The fact that Pol Pot or Stalin chose genocide has less to do with their atheism than it had to do with political control. Atheism does not have a particular dogma. There is nothing about being atheist that mandates killing of other people. In other words, it was a conscious choice these leaders made. I accept that they killed people. Lots of people. But they killed people who stood in their way, whether they were believers, atheists, fellow Communists, whatever. They were pretty indiscriminate that way. Many consider Hitler an atheist, too. But he only killed people of a particular faith (Jewish), background (gypsies), or sexual orientation.

I would say that some of these people were anti-certain religions, but not anti-religion per se. If so, why did Pol Pot not kill every believer of every faith? Same with Hitler? Why did Hitler only kill certain groups of people, but not Christians or Catholics?

I also categorically reject the idea of banning religion. Atheism does not require that. Any atheist that claims they want to ban religion is simply following that as a separate idea. It has nothing to do with atheism.

However some religions in the world do maintain dogma that leaves them concerned with the souls of other people and that, in some cases, has mandated the killing of other people in support of of and in furtherance of religious beliefs. In other words, my point is that they killed because they believed god mandated it. This is the issue.

Atheism does not mandate the killing of people. Where did you read that?

_____________________________

~ ftp

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 87
RE: Atheists more compassionate than believers, study f... - 5/18/2012 9:51:43 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

You could also read up on the atheist Pol Pot or maybe the atheist governments in the fromer Soviet Union and Communist China.



If you could be a bit more specific I would be most happy to shred your arguement
To quote tomcat drivers "any time baby"

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 88
RE: Atheists more compassionate than believers, study f... - 5/18/2012 9:54:42 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
There is no credible evidence for or against atheism regarding Pol Pot.

Stalin was studying in the seminary before becoming a communist......we have no credible evidence for or against regarding his belief. 


< Message edited by mnottertail -- 5/18/2012 9:57:30 AM >


_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 89
RE: Atheists more compassionate than believers, study f... - 5/18/2012 8:09:28 PM   
dcnovice


Posts: 37282
Joined: 8/2/2006
Status: offline
quote:

The reasons why Pol Pot and other Marxist regimes murdered their citizens had nothing to do with their atheism. Their actions were motivated by their political philosophy (such as it was).


But wasn't atheism a key pillar of that philosophy? Papa Marx, after all, had decried religion as the opiate of the masses, and Lenin declared, "Atheism is a natural and inseparable part of Marxism, of the theory and practice of scientific socialism." It sounds to me like he viewed it as a somewhat more central characteristic to his work than Capone's Italian heritage was to his.

Marxist-Leninist regimes went to no small lengths to root out religion, both public and private. Those efforts included direct persecution of many religious folk, such as Richard Wurmbrand and Jozsef Mindszenty--to name two top-of-mind examples.

How exactly atheism played into the ruthlessness that marked Marxist-Leninist regimes requires more study than I can give it right now. Perhaps the loss of the idea that people were created in the divine image or endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights made it easier to view the populace as Stalin did: (a) "Death solves all problems - no man, no problem." or (b) "One death is a tragedy; one million is a statistic."

Whatever the fine points of the Marxist-Leninist mindset, it seems hard to escape the grim facts that (a) atheism was a key belief, per Marx and Lenin's own words above and (b) that mindset underlay some of the worst savagery in human history.

_____________________________

No matter how cynical you become,
it's never enough to keep up.

JANE WAGNER, THE SEARCH FOR SIGNS OF
INTELLIGENT LIFE IN THE UNIVERSE

(in reply to tweakabelle)
Profile   Post #: 90
RE: Atheists more compassionate than believers, study f... - 5/18/2012 8:57:59 PM   
MasterSlaveLA


Posts: 3991
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: fucktoyprincess

...the Spanish Inquisition



The 1400s are not even remotely relevant to either this discussion or to Christians today.



_____________________________

It's only kinky the first time!!!

(in reply to fucktoyprincess)
Profile   Post #: 91
RE: Atheists more compassionate than believers, study f... - 5/18/2012 9:03:56 PM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterSlaveLA

quote:

ORIGINAL: fucktoyprincess

...the Spanish Inquisition



The 1400s are not even remotely relevant to either this discussion or to Christians today.




The Bible was written 1400 years earlier than that, yet people still think the Bible's relevant . . . .


_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to MasterSlaveLA)
Profile   Post #: 92
RE: Atheists more compassionate than believers, study f... - 5/18/2012 9:07:24 PM   
Master2811


Posts: 120
Joined: 5/4/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: GotSteel

So I'll sometimes come across arguments for god which aren't based on the truth of the claim but on how it's beneficial even if it's isn't true. Besides pointing out why I'm horrified by those "so what if it's a scam" arguments it's also nice when I'm able to point out that those claimed benefits aren't true.

There's one argument that I'd just never been able to find any data for until I came across this today:

quote:

ORIGINAL: http://now.msn.com/living/0504-atheists-compassion.aspx
Who's more generous, religious people or atheists? If you guessed believers, you're wrong, according to a new study conducted at the University of California, Berkeley. Researchers found that atheists and agnostics were actually "more inclined to help their fellow citizens" by, say, giving food or money to those in need, than were people who identified as religious. The study's authors, who surveyed 1,300 Americans, suggested that non-believers may be driven by emotions like compassion, whereas religious people may be motivated by "doctrine, a communal identity or reputational concerns." Chances are atheists will find the study's conclusions easy to believe, while believers will doubt them.



OK. 1,300 Americans as proof of a study? Totally laughable. Ask the victims of the formally atheist state, the Soviet Union. Oh wait you cannot ask them. They all died in the Gulag.

(in reply to GotSteel)
Profile   Post #: 93
RE: Atheists more compassionate than believers, study f... - 5/18/2012 9:54:40 PM   
tweakabelle


Posts: 7522
Joined: 10/16/2007
From: Sydney Australia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: dcnovice

quote:

The reasons why Pol Pot and other Marxist regimes murdered their citizens had nothing to do with their atheism. Their actions were motivated by their political philosophy (such as it was).


But wasn't atheism a key pillar of that philosophy? Papa Marx, after all, had decried religion as the opiate of the masses, and Lenin declared, "Atheism is a natural and inseparable part of Marxism, of the theory and practice of scientific socialism." It sounds to me like he viewed it as a somewhat more central characteristic to his work than Capone's Italian heritage was to his.

Marxist-Leninist regimes went to no small lengths to root out religion, both public and private. Those efforts included direct persecution of many religious folk, such as Richard Wurmbrand and Jozsef Mindszenty--to name two top-of-mind examples.

How exactly atheism played into the ruthlessness that marked Marxist-Leninist regimes requires more study than I can give it right now. Perhaps the loss of the idea that people were created in the divine image or endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights made it easier to view the populace as Stalin did: (a) "Death solves all problems - no man, no problem." or (b) "One death is a tragedy; one million is a statistic."

Whatever the fine points of the Marxist-Leninist mindset, it seems hard to escape the grim facts that (a) atheism was a key belief, per Marx and Lenin's own words above and (b) that mindset underlay some of the worst savagery in human history.

If this is the best you can do, best you forget this argument.

The kind of Marxism practiced by these butchers shares with many religions an absolute belief in its own self righteousness. If you're looking for a genuine understanding of why these butchers behaved the way they did, this belief - in one's absolute self-righteousness - makes a far more sensible starting place. Of course, apologists for religion are reluctant to look here - because religions often make the very same claim.

Your 'argument' at best only applies to 'Marxist' butchers. There are many 20th century butchers who weren't Marxists - for example, Hitler, the Belgians in the Congo, the Armenian genocide...... A absolute belief in their own self righteousness is a trait shared by all the major 20th century butchers, and many others from previous centuries (including religiously motivated butchers such as the Inquisition). It describes the evidence in a far more meaningful way, and allows us to to describe a lot more of the available evidence.

So if you wish to continue clinging to your straw, you'll have to tell us why your explanation has more merit than one that covers describes much more of the phenomenon in a far more satisfactory manner.

< Message edited by tweakabelle -- 5/18/2012 9:59:29 PM >


_____________________________



(in reply to dcnovice)
Profile   Post #: 94
RE: Atheists more compassionate than believers, study f... - 5/18/2012 11:24:16 PM   
MasterSlaveLA


Posts: 3991
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterSlaveLA

quote:

ORIGINAL: fucktoyprincess

...the Spanish Inquisition



The 1400s are not even remotely relevant to either this discussion or to Christians today.




The Bible was written 1400 years earlier than that, yet people still think the Bible's relevant . . . .



The Bible IS still relevant, the Spanish Inquisition is not -- lest you can provide some evidence that Christians are running around mass-murdering non-Christians in 2012.   You know this, right -- or were you just...





Attachment (1)

_____________________________

It's only kinky the first time!!!

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 95
RE: Atheists more compassionate than believers, study f... - 5/19/2012 12:26:31 AM   
tweakabelle


Posts: 7522
Joined: 10/16/2007
From: Sydney Australia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterSlaveLA

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterSlaveLA

quote:

ORIGINAL: fucktoyprincess

...the Spanish Inquisition



The 1400s are not even remotely relevant to either this discussion or to Christians today.




The Bible was written 1400 years earlier than that, yet people still think the Bible's relevant . . . .



The Bible IS still relevant, the Spanish Inquisition is not -- lest you can provide some evidence that Christians are running around mass-murdering non-Christians in 2012.   You know this, right -- or were you just...



On the contrary the Inquisition is still with us today.

The Inquisition's full title was the "Congregation of the Holy Office of the Inquisition." According to wiki:

"In 1908 the name of the Congregation [ of the Holy Office of the Inquisition] became "The Sacred Congregation of the Holy Office", which in 1965 further changed to "Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith", as retained to the present day. The Pope appoints a cardinal to preside over the Congregation, which usually includes ten other cardinals, as well as a prelate and two assistants, all chosen from the Dominican Order. The "Holy Office" also has an international group of consultants, experienced scholars in theology and canon law, who advise it on specific questions" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inquisition

So the Inquisition, in its current manifestation, is still active today and retains an active role in maintaining doctrinal purity within the Catholic Church.

< Message edited by tweakabelle -- 5/19/2012 12:27:32 AM >


_____________________________



(in reply to MasterSlaveLA)
Profile   Post #: 96
RE: Atheists more compassionate than believers, study f... - 5/19/2012 12:38:20 AM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle
quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterSlaveLA

The Bible IS still relevant, the Spanish Inquisition is not -- lest you can provide some evidence that Christians are running around mass-murdering non-Christians in 2012. You know this, right -- or were you just...

On the contrary the Inquisition is still with us today... the Inquisition, in its current manifestation, is still active today

I believe she said the Spanish Inquisition, which was under the control of the Spanish Monarchy, not the Church.

K.

(in reply to tweakabelle)
Profile   Post #: 97
RE: Atheists more compassionate than believers, study f... - 5/19/2012 5:44:35 AM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterSlaveLA


The Bible IS still relevant, the Spanish Inquisition is not -- lest you can provide some evidence that Christians are running around mass-murdering non-Christians in 2012.   You know this, right -- or were you just...



Wow - thanks for the enormous picture, MSLA. I hardly feel that my passing comment deserved the effort, tbh. Way to make a guy feel important!

I suppose my general point is that, of course, Christianity does set great store in the past. That's pretty obvious: it values a text that's two thousand years old (or thereabouts). But, also, it values the 'evolution' of the meaning of that text, through the ages.

_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to MasterSlaveLA)
Profile   Post #: 98
RE: Atheists more compassionate than believers, study f... - 5/19/2012 6:28:53 AM   
thishereboi


Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: fucktoyprincess


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

Fr

Here is a pretty easy test:
Which is more ethical someone who does the right thing because it is the right thing
or:
Someone who does the right thing because they fear god is going to fuck over them if they do not do the right thing?



Again, for me, personally, I am not interested in trying to convince anyone to be atheist. If people need religion in their lives in order to do the right thing, then so be it. In fact, if that is the only thing keeping them in line, I'm happier if they do believe. But if they are free to have their belief system, then I want to be free to have mine. I want to be left alone, and I don't want political policies dominated by one religious group.

I don't know that we even need to answer the "is it more ethical" as long as there can be true peaceful co-existence. And again, this is where the difficulty arises....


What makes you think someone "needs" religion? I lived many years as an athiest and did just fine without religion. I still knew right from wrong and didn't need a god to tell me which was which. The fact that I believe now doesn't change any of that. If athiests want to be left alone, that is fine with me. I just find them amusing as hell when they spend this much time trying to prove they are somehow better than believers. What they fail to admit to is there are just as many haters and assholes on their side of the fence, but they ignore those and focus on the religious nuts and try to paint everyone with the same brush.

_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert


This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi


(in reply to fucktoyprincess)
Profile   Post #: 99
RE: Atheists more compassionate than believers, study f... - 5/19/2012 6:39:26 AM   
thishereboi


Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline
quote:

Seems to me that 1300 is way more than they needed to survey.

And I'm sure most prescription drugs are tested on fewer than 1300 people. So those of you who feel 1300 is too small, please don't use any prescription medication because clearly they haven't been tested to your standards.


One has nothing to do with the other. You test prescription drugs to see what effects they will have on the body. Asking a small number of people how they feel about something and trying to claim that it means everyone thinks the same way is totally different.

_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert


This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi


(in reply to fucktoyprincess)
Profile   Post #: 100
Page:   <<   < prev  2 3 4 [5] 6   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Atheists more compassionate than believers, study finds Page: <<   < prev  2 3 4 [5] 6   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094