RE: "Godless Communism"! (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Owner59 -> RE: "Godless Communism"! (5/22/2012 11:06:51 AM)

It would seem that none of the "isms"(as we called the class in HS)have worked out in practice, as planned or as defined......accept anarchy.

One thing that seems to hold true is that there will always be a small few trying to take advantage of others, to steal their money,labor or their lives, if they can become powerful enough.

It`s human nature.




GotSteel -> RE: "Godless Communism"! (5/22/2012 11:16:05 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: YSG
"Communism is anti-religious". Well, ok, to some extent this is true.




[image]local://upfiles/566126/4F55C70BC1184285ADDFFDEE258C0C22.gif[/image]




lovmuffin -> RE: "Godless Communism"! (5/22/2012 11:24:01 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

 
What most of the "capitalists" do isn`t capitalism or free enterprise.

In capitalism......there`s no secret deals,betting other people`s money on risky bets and bets designed to be lost.

In capitalism,the markets are supposed to be open and honest and policed and fair.What you buy in is worth what it was sold as.

Capitalism isn`t inside info and insider trading with a privileged few benefiting.


Unfortunately way too much a that shit happens in congress. I'm talkin about both sides of the isle.

Your right, capitalism isn't or shouldn't be.




SternSkipper -> RE: "Godless Communism"! (5/22/2012 11:37:09 AM)

quote:

Some of us think that gulags are bad.


I bet




SternSkipper -> RE: "Godless Communism"! (5/22/2012 11:42:42 AM)

quote:

We are greedy creatures at times and crave praise, success, and wealth and must feed our pride with personal accomplishment even if at the expense of others.


Change the "We" shit to "I" statements and you got yourself one hell of a FaceBook Information page update [:D]




richardsmith -> RE: "Godless Communism"! (5/22/2012 11:42:48 AM)

hi,how are you to day




SternSkipper -> RE: "Godless Communism"! (5/22/2012 11:43:45 AM)

quote:

Change the "We" shit to "I" statements and you got yourself one hell of a FaceBook Information page update


And you'd come up every time someone searches for Mitt Romney




SternSkipper -> RE: "Godless Communism"! (5/22/2012 11:45:15 AM)

Takin the new sock puppet out for a ride?




kdsub -> RE: "Godless Communism"! (5/22/2012 8:40:02 PM)

quote:

You may speak for yourself but do not presume to speak for me...not everyone on this planet is a self absorbed asshole.


You may have a bit of disagreement here on the boards with the above statement but not from me...I would not call you an asshole...vainglorious maybe.

Butch




Karmastic -> RE: "Godless Communism"! (5/22/2012 9:21:48 PM)

meh, you simply call my assertions asinine, and think i'm getting this from fox news. i'm not, it comes from watching international news from all over the world (literally, 6 countries) almost everyday.

re not having a clue about economics, i guess i should get a refund on my college degree and quit my job.





SternSkipper -> RE: "Godless Communism"! (5/22/2012 9:35:11 PM)

Boy Stalin Doesn't Look Happy about being grouped with those two. He's got this look like Pat Boone finding out he's singing at a gay wedding
[image]http://www.collarchat.com/upfiles/42188/93391A0347204B758ACA2A82390FFCCE.jpg[/image]




fucktoyprincess -> RE: "Godless Communism"! (5/23/2012 9:10:19 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Marc2b

It is not so much the godlessness that bothers me as that fact that the godlessness is enforced. I am disdainful of religious fundamentalists of any stripe but as long as they mind their manners (that is, respect the rights of others) I am content to let them be. They can sit on their pews and rant about the evils of homosexuality or evolution all they want. I may not like it, but I respect their right to do so... as long as they respect the rights of others and don't try to impose their faith on others (in other words, keep your stupid creationism out of the science classrooms and lay of the gays who want to get married).

Communism, like almost any ideology, looks good on paper but it inevitably runs into that old bugaboo - human nature. In economic terms, communism is socialism taken to the extreme and you rarely find the answers to anything at the extremes. As others have noted, China has had to liberalize its economy to get it to work (likewise, a totally unregulated economy wouldn't work either... the trick, as all the endless arguments attest to, is in finding the right balance).

My biggest problem with communism, however, is that, despite proclamations to the contrary, it amounts to just another case of a few powerful individuals at the top exploiting those beneath them (the fact that they proclaim themselves a classless society is some of the rankest hypocrisy humans have ever come up with). Every nation that has ever been ruled by communists has been nothing more that another tyrannical oligarchy.

Whatever flaws representative democracy may has, it is still flexible enough to change with the times and to oust the worst of the bad apples at the top... or at least limit their duration. Ever since I can remember I've been hearing from the "patriotic opposition" that the current President is going to implement martial law and rule as a dictator. Nixon was going to do it, Carter was going to do it, and so were Reagan, Bush (the Elder), Clinton, Bush (the Younger) and now Obama is planning on doing it (Ford seems to be the one exception... too busy getting up from the tarmac I suppose). Despite these dire proclamations, it has never happened.

Which is not to say that it couldn't happen but so far, so good. Eternal vigilance is the price we pay. Freedom is a tenuous thing. Contrary to the dramatic screaming of many on the internet, the United States is NOT a police state... yet... communist governments are.


Yes, I think I mostly agree with the above. It is not the "godlessness" per se that is at issue. It is the fact that many Communist regimes in the past felt the only way they could maintain power was to eliminate religion. And as we just discussed in the atheist thread, if you believe that people need religion, trying to eliminate it is not going to work in your favor over time. People grow to resent it.

When I read the writings of some of the Communist thinkers from history, I do feel there is a tension that they have between the teachings of Christianity, in particular with some of the methods that they needed to use in order to gain power. You can't have a "Revolution" without killing a few people. But what they failed to realize is that historically, the world has been witness to revolutions of large scale - for example, the French Revolution, where, although France was Catholic, they had no difficulty squaring their faith with the guillotine. [:D]

What people fail to realize is that if you read religious scriptures carefully, and in the original language, the Old Testament does not actually prohibit killing. It prohibits "murder". In other words, the Christian Bible, as originally written, does not, for example, prohibit a soldier from killing someone during a war. The Bible is, in fact, full of descriptions of war/conflict between different peoples. So if you view a serious conflict between the haves and have-nots as a type of war, then I don't believe there is any major religion that prohibits killing during war.

There may be a few religions (Jainism? Buddhism?) that prohibit any killing, but these are few and far between. Most religions have a long history of being associated also with war.

While I am an atheist, and I do believe in having a society that protects the weak, I am by no stretch of the imagination a "socialist" as that term is typically understood. And while some socialists from history may have embraced atheism, there is nothing about atheism that "requires" anyone to be be socialist. I wonder if some of the hatred directed towards atheists has to do with people mistakenly conflating atheism with socialism? They are not the same. [sm=2cents.gif]





GotSteel -> RE: "Godless Communism"! (5/23/2012 2:50:11 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: fucktoyprincess
It is not the "godlessness" per se that is at issue. It is the fact that many Communist regimes in the past felt the only way they could maintain power was to eliminate religion.


Going back to the opiate of the masses quote, I don't thinks these were trying to get people off drugs and into rehab. They were claiming territory, working to make sure they were the only dealer around.




thompsonx -> RE: "Godless Communism"! (5/23/2012 6:22:44 PM)

quote:

Communism kills people without a war going on.


Since 1789 when has the u.s. not been at war?




thompsonx -> RE: "Godless Communism"! (5/23/2012 6:28:24 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

 
What most of the "capitalists" do isn`t capitalism or free enterprise.

In capitalism......there`s no secret deals,betting other people`s money on risky bets and bets designed to be lost.

In capitalism,the markets are supposed to be open and honest and policed and fair.What you buy in is worth what it was sold as.

Capitalism isn`t inside info and insider trading with a privileged few benefiting.



You are mistaken. Perhaps you should do some research about what capitalism is and how it works. What you wish it were does not count.




thompsonx -> RE: "Godless Communism"! (5/23/2012 6:44:18 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML


quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

One should also consider that most Germans and Italians were god fearing.........the time WWII was going down.


But their Dictatoships were Socialists . . . . Fascism was Socialist at its core; not free enterprise.



Isn't socialism where the state controls the means of production for the benifit of all the citizens of that country?
Isn't fascism where the state controls the means of production for the benifit of private capital?



quote:

Maybe in the dictionary, TommyX, but in reality it was quite different.


Do you really believe that refering to me with a diminuitive adds validity to your position?

quote:

Lenin, Stalin, Trotsky and the Internatonale were Collectivists on the Left. Hitler and Mussolini were Collectivists on the Right. Lenin's premise from the outset was that the revolution could only be brought about and maintained by a ruthless central cadre. Uncle Joe took that ball and ran amuck with it. It would be delusional to believe they cared a wit for the benefit of the people. The proleteriat was a means to revolution.



Please do not conflate colectivst in this fashion. One side was fascist and the other socialist. I am quite aware that you know the difference.
Control is central to any revolution be it fascist or socialist.
If the did not care one whit for the people please explane the following.
Universal sufferage.
universal education.
No export of food all food grown in the ussr was to be used in the ussr.


quote:

Hitler used the industrialists strictly to rearm Germany. I doubt he gave a rat's ass about any benefit to private capital. Undoubtably you are aware that the Nazis were the National SOCIALIST Party.


Perhaps you should read a little about krupp and spear. They are quite detailed in how they and the rest of the industralist profited by hitlers protocol.
If you are not aware of how the name national socialist came about then you have no business in this discussion.


quote:

The marriage of Fascism and Socialism was engineered by Benito Mussoini in his concept of the 'corporate state.' Benito was originally a very active member and journalist/propagandists for the Italian Socialist Party.



A corporate state for the benifit of corporations is not socialism and you of all people should know that.


quote:

One of them anyway. Until he marched on Rome and intimidated King Immanuel into appointing him PM. Benito was a bully who had dreams of revisiting the Roman Empire. Hitler seems to have co-opted that same dream from his mentor Mussolini.


If anyone was the mentor it was hitler not mussolini

quote:

If you go back to the revolutions of 1848 you will probably find some socialist doctrine that supports your definitions. However, the workers revolutions at that time were often in conflict with the Aristocracy, the peasants, and the revolutions of the land holders against the crown. It was all a freakin mess.


The bolshiviks pitted the workers(peasants,serfs and industrial workers against the aristocracy(land holders both large and small)

quote:

I think I got all of that right. Correct me otherwise.


I have made the corrections you asked for.




fucktoyprincess -> RE: "Godless Communism"! (5/23/2012 6:45:58 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

 
What most of the "capitalists" do isn`t capitalism or free enterprise.

In capitalism......there`s no secret deals,betting other people`s money on risky bets and bets designed to be lost.

In capitalism,the markets are supposed to be open and honest and policed and fair.What you buy in is worth what it was sold as.

Capitalism isn`t inside info and insider trading with a privileged few benefiting.


Do you mean the economic theory of perfect markets that is defined by several conditions including perfect competition???? That is an economic theory used to model certain theories in the abstract. It does not actually describe any existing market on the planet.

Also, the economic theory of perfect markets is NOT the same as capitalism or the same as free enterprise. These are all different constructs.




thompsonx -> RE: "Godless Communism"! (5/23/2012 6:51:05 PM)

quote:

As for the Soviets, it was really a ruthless Dictatorship, as we all know.


It has been my experience that when someone says "eveyone knows that..." The fact is that no one knows such and such.
How much dissent was allowed in this country to the loosers of the revolution. Was it not the failure of the revolutionaries to adhear to the treaty of paris that led to the war of 1812?
Was not a policy of "the only good indian was a dead indian" followed "ruthlessly by the revolutionaries through a succession of u.s. presidents? The people stalin had executed...were they not those who opposed the revolution?
How exactly do the two revolutions differ?




thompsonx -> RE: "Godless Communism"! (5/23/2012 7:09:56 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Karmastic

meh, you simply call my assertions asinine, and think i'm getting this from fox news. i'm not, it comes from watching international news from all over the world (literally, 6 countries) almost everyday.

re not having a clue about economics, i guess i should get a refund on my college degree and quit my job.



quote:

but it's failed the world over, not just the Soviets.


Perhaps you might want to validate this assanine statement with something besides the puke that eminates from faux news.
If you could validate your statements you would you did not so that would be prima facia evidence that you cannot.
That being said I do not think it possible your college will refund your money for fucking off in class. If you get paid for your lack of knowledge...good on you.
Is there any chance you might condescind to validate your opinions?
I would be the first to agree that you are entitled to your opinion...no matter how irrational,assanine or unsupported it may be.








GotSteel -> RE: "Godless Communism"! (5/25/2012 6:02:24 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: GotSteel
[image]local://upfiles/566126/4F55C70BC1184285ADDFFDEE258C0C22.gif[/image]


I'm surprised that nobodies commenting on how communism isn't godless. It's a religious idea that got co-opted.




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875