Does it apply to D/s? Admonishment, apparently for women, seeking men for a 'vanilla' relationship? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


pompeii -> Does it apply to D/s? Admonishment, apparently for women, seeking men for a 'vanilla' relationship? (5/22/2012 8:24:55 AM)

I just now saw this on the San Francisco Bay Area/Silicon Valley Craigslist and, having resonated with what was stated, I immediately wondered how much applies to women looking for men specifically for D/s relationships.

Bear in mind, this advert below was written (presumably) by a man who is (just as presumably) advising women for no other reason than to be himself a good caring citizen.

Personally, what he wrote resonates with me - the obvious caveat being I'm not a woman looking for a man for a relationship, D/s or otherwise.

Despite the fact this wasn't originally written to apply to D/s "profiles", I immediately wondered if, and how much applies to D/s lifestyle searches?

Therefore, in the hope that we (including me) may learn from the discussion - I pointedly ask:

Q: How well would you say this advice below also applies to women seeking a D/s partner through the profiles here at CM?


Finding your man and keeping him - 48 (Love, Logic and Reality)
Date: 2012-05-18, 10:42PM PDT
Reply to: <removed>
The truth that will set us free is often the truth we don't want to hear.

Once I get past all the spam in the W4M section, I see many of the remaining "real" women still struggling to understand real men. Sometimes it takes a logical thought process and a willingness to face facts in order to find and keep your dream man.

I apologize in advance if I say something you don't want to hear, please just move on, and don't flag this post. Other women may be able to benefit from it, even if you are one of those rare women who don't need or wouldn't benefit from any any of those suggestions.

Rule #1. Get down to your optimal weight (notice I said optimal, not minimum). The more attractive the man you want (tall, educated, confident, successful, etc), the more attractive you must be. Truly confident and accomplished men are simply not attracted to overweight women. Go to the gym, get out and run. Stop eating junk food. A man may not be able to do anything about being shorter than 6' but you can certainly do something about the size of your waist. Take care of it, and you will be more likely to find a man who will take care of the rest of you. There is a reason why this rule is #1, its because this is the #1 thing that women try to rationalize their way around and hide, deny or dismiss. This disheartens and infuriates men more than any other factor, because women make it impossible for men to ever give them this feedback.

Rule #2. Be feminine. Transcend the war of the sexes. Be the hard-nosed professional at work, but in the presence of your man: learn the joys of surrendering. There is nothing more destructive than a woman who wants to be in control and get her own way, but doesn't take responsibility for her decisions (or the consequences of her emotional excursions to get what she wants). This does not mean be a doormat. It means offer him the polarity of your feminine essence, and you will bring out the polarity of his masculine integrity. The combination is indescribably beautiful, and is the foundation of a long-lasting, deeply loving and spiritually grounded relationship. Read David Deida's "Dear lover" for insight.

Rule #3. If you don't want to feel "controlled" by him, then earn your own way in life. Develop a career (not just a part time or 9-5 job). This will at least get you out of the stage one (macho male / submissive housewife) relationship that your parents had, into stage two (equal) relationship; but equal relationships don't last, have you checked the divorce statistics recently? You must learn to transcend both: stand up for yourself, demand the respect you are due as a human being, but also contribute financially to the relationship (either directly, OR by supporting your man in tangible ways that help him in his work). If you don't want to do either of these alternatives, then stop whining about the man controlling you, he is only trying to do the best he can in the circumstances you have constrained him to.

Rule #4. Men are not mind readers: its not his job to make you happy, its yours. If you want something from a man, then tell him, don't make him guess. A man who is in love with you will go to the ends of the earth to try and make you happy, but if you are unconscious about it, you will burn him out and use him up (not to mention his capacity to provide for you financially). Take responsibility for yourself, learn with him how to create a truly evolved and conscious relationship, only then will he be be able to take "radical responsibility" for both himself, and you, and the health and direction of your relationship.

Rule #5. Men are stupid. Its the nature of the relative disconnection in the two hemispheres of our brains. We don't have your emotional fluidity or ability to multitask. But we often do have a logical intelligence, and a strong heart which gives us the ability to conquer fear, and to go out and slay dragons in the world, especially in an economy like we have now. Integrity is a primary currency between men, we don't understand that this is not true for women. If you "say" you value integrity in your man, and he has given you his heart, then stop manipulating him with your superior emotional intelligence. Tell him straight what you need, in as many different ways as you can, and trust that he will hear you one day and figure out how to give it to you.

Rule #6. Men want sex and have fantasies all the time, OK? He needs your feminine energy to be calm, collected and inspired as he goes out into the world to create a secure future for you both. Without it, men become neurotic, disoriented, and lose their sense of purpose. Think of it as sexual food: without which your man will wither and die. Yes, women have their needs too, but in men the need appears to be far more essential to their well-being and ability to function. If you dismiss, disregard, or try to suppress the sexual needs of your man, you will eventually lose him. Maybe not this week or this month, but certainly one day. What most men mean when they say "irreconcilable differences" is something like, she stopped giving me blow jobs (or whatever was his favorite bedroom activity) as soon as our honeymoon was over. What most women mean by "irreconcilable differences" something like, he stopped showing me affection and I no longer felt loved. This is a quid-pro quo: you don't get one without the other. It is the responsibility of you both to give the other what they need, consistently, and for long after the honeymoon is over. Your man needs regular "sexual healing", more than he even knows, or may be willing to admit to himself.

Rule #7. Recognize that you are in a "Market" for men to find (just as men are in a "Market" for you). Learn how to be more marketable to the men you want (you know, those handsome, intelligent, successful ones ...). But don't make the mistake of thinking you know what that might be (apart from rule #1 above). Take a look at the w4m, and m4w postings: compare them. See, for example, how often the word spanking comes up in men's postings, and how infrequently it comes up in the women's section. In economics, this is called finding a hole in the market. Open your mind, realize that something like a spanking fantasy, in the vast majority of cases, is harmless yet extremely potent sexually for men. Some men just like the activity (or the idea of it), so if you don't like the idea of being a recipient, then look at the postings for men wanting to be on the receiving end (see Melinda Maximova article in the SF Examiner on "spanking-your-man"). (NOTE: the suggestion for spanking is just an example, look for your own "holes" in the market", and open up your mind to the possibilities to find that Mr. Right - often the more intelligent, capable and successful men are also the ones with the more elaborate imaginations when it comes to fantasies ).

Rule #8. Don't stand for men who lie, steal, or are unable to keep down a job or can't get off drugs (including alcohol). Toss them back in the sea, they are not worth having (yet). You will serve them better by rejecting them, AND being clear about why you are rejecting them! Men are learning machines: they thrive on challenge and rejection: they will learn to be the men they were meant to be if they are given the message clearly and consistently by women. Maybe at some time in the future, those same men will become worth having; they won't get that way if you cut them any slack regarding their basic traits of character and integrity.

Rule #9. Women are crazy, and its not always men that make them that way. Women do this to themselves quite nicely thank you. Men can learn to live with this, but if you want to grow and thrive together, and have a continuously deepening and connected relationship with a fabulous man, then cultivate a trust for your man when YOU get into those states (or at least learn to meet him half way). Ultimately, he can make better decisions, and take far better care of you if you if you trust his judgment. He is probably looking at a much bigger picture, and of many potential dangers to be avoided and opportunities to be optimized than are in your immediate zone of awareness.

Rule #10. When you find a good man. Hang onto him. There aren't that many of them hanging around being single for long (or haven't you noticed?).

One final point: demanding a picture in an initial interaction is no longer appropriate on Craigslist. Men know that the W4M section is swamped by criminals sex workers and and spammers. Quality men value their privacy and simply won't send pictures to anonymous email addresses who have a high probability of being fake. The spam merchants are also getting more sophisticated, so make allowances, and adjust your demands and expectations to match where the world is today, otherwise, you will simply end up inadvertently rejecting the higher quality men on this site, along with your dream man, without even realizing it.


EDIT: Emphasis added by Pompeii ... (ps. We men are often like dogs ... most, like me, are very very very simple to understand ... and very easy to please ... and horrifically horny all the God danged time, whether we want to be or not ... and you women are the most delicious delights we know! IMHO).




RemoteUser -> RE: Does it apply to D/s? Admonishment, apparently for women, seeking men for a 'vanilla' relationship? (5/22/2012 9:56:58 AM)

Meh.

Like anything else, this applies by the individual. It has a few Captain Obvious moments, a few wtf were you thinking moments (especially the shots at both sexes that were probably failed humour). I personally found nothing new here.




MissImmortalPain -> RE: Does it apply to D/s? Admonishment, apparently for women, seeking men for a 'vanilla' relationship? (5/22/2012 10:06:49 AM)

Blah, blah, blah. In other words be everything and do it perfectly. While at the same time demanding the man be perfect too , though not expecting much from him(because men are stupid and can't multi task) and expecting him to take care of you. But not take care of you or make you happy because thats not his job. Of course as a crazy person(woman) you prolly don't know that so let me (random guy on the net point it out to you) All in all a nice way for a man to say he is dominant but that he doesn't have to prove it or actually care how a woman might feel about it.

If you had not posted this here, had I wandered across it someplace else, I wouldn't have bothered reading half of it.

As for if it applies to women seeking D/s here....I assume you only mean women that want to be on the s side. As someone on the D side I would think it is horrid advice.

Maybe you should have posted this in ask a sub and seen how many of them would agree with it?




geekgamegirl -> RE: Does it apply to D/s? Admonishment, apparently for women, seeking men for a 'vanilla' relationship? (5/22/2012 10:21:31 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: pompeii



Rule #1. Get down to your optimal weight

Rule #2. Be feminine.

Rule #3. If you don't want to feel "controlled" by him, then earn your own way in life.

Rule #4. Men are not mind readers:

Rule #5. Men are stupid.

Rule #6. Men want sex and have fantasies all the time

Rule #7. Recognize that you are in a "Market" for men to find

Rule #8. Don't stand for men who lie, steal, or are unable to keep down a job or can't get off drugs

Rule #9. Women are crazy

Rule #10. When you find a good man. Hang onto him.

1 - I am overwieght and have gained wieght since getting together with my partner. He's cool with it.
2 - Most days I dress in jeans and baggy tees. I rarely wear makeup or high heels. He loves it when I wear dresses and get girly - but gets just as turned on when I look like shit first thing in the morning. Its me he gets hot for.
3 - He's happy with me being a housewife and bringing nothing finantially because of my ill health. I'm not controled or in any way obliged because that's not our dynamic.
4 - Women aren't either.
5 - If I wanted to go out with a stupid man I wouldn't be engaged to a guy who assistant lectures while doing his masters.
6 - He has a damn high sex drive, however during a period of incredibly poor health on my side we couldn't have sex. He upped his masturbation and got on with it.
7 - A "market" that heavily favours women.
8 - Same goes for men looking for women.
9 - No more crazy than guys. I could be here forever telling the stories of unhinged men I've met online and in real life.
10 - Same with a woman, bub.

Basically this guy is bitter and throwing a temper tantrum because he can't find a woman who ticks every little box he wants and isn't willing to compromise and get a personality beyond that of a horny 18 year old guy imho. [8|]

(Edited for clarity)




LadyHibiscus -> RE: Does it apply to D/s? Admonishment, apparently for women, seeking men for a 'vanilla' relationship? (5/22/2012 10:32:27 AM)

So. Bitches be crazy, and men are stupid dogs who sniff after every skirt?

That is more cynicism than even I am capable of.




MissImmortalPain -> RE: Does it apply to D/s? Admonishment, apparently for women, seeking men for a 'vanilla' relationship? (5/22/2012 10:43:54 AM)

You know the funny thing is I say that to people all the time. That women are crazy and men are stupid. That you have to be crazy to put up with stupid and you have to be stupid to put up with crazy. That you need one to balance out the other.




Whiplashsmile4 -> RE: Does it apply to D/s? Admonishment, apparently for women, seeking men for a 'vanilla' relationship? (5/22/2012 11:36:51 AM)

Sure...some of this can apply D/s as well as not applying to it.

There are a lot of people which are mentally, emotionally, physically or Financially out of shape. (mind you, there are some are legit reasons.. however, more times than not there are layers of excuses involved).

The one word or concept out of everything in opening post I liked was "optimal", because that seems to be a pretty reasonable and realistic goal.







littlewonder -> RE: Does it apply to D/s? Admonishment, apparently for women, seeking men for a 'vanilla' relationship? (5/22/2012 11:49:49 AM)

It doesn't apply to me, bdsm or not. Most of what he wrote is simply common sense stuff no matter who it is, male or female, bdsm or not. The rest is of course, a guy writing what HE wants in a woman, not what women should do to get a date. Some of those are just so stupid it's not funny.

And THIS by geekgamegirl

quote:


Basically this guy is bitter and throwing a temper tantrum because he can't find a woman who ticks every little box he wants and isn't willing to compromise and get a personality beyond that of a horny 18 year old guy imho.




EllenofTroy -> RE: Does it apply to D/s? Admonishment, apparently for women, seeking men for a 'vanilla' relationship? (5/22/2012 12:09:59 PM)

The happiest, long termed and most content of couples I've encountered accept and love each other for themselves. Better or worse. Quirks, warts and all. Throw out the laundry list, rules and general manic, anal, self imposed b*ll s*it non realistic criteria and simply love another who smiles at you like you're the only person in the world. Bodies change, careers are lost, accidents happen. Life tilts and scatters and no "list" can keep you strong during rough times. Love can. Idealistic but I'm a crazy woman who has no interest in seeing people as extension of my damn self but as unique creatures of God.




DesFIP -> RE: Does it apply to D/s? Admonishment, apparently for women, seeking men for a 'vanilla' relationship? (5/22/2012 12:17:08 PM)

And all of it also applies to men seeking women.

A man can't do anything about his height, but he can about his weight.

Men have issues that make them seem crazy to women as often as women do that make them seem this way to men. But women are twice as likely to seek professional help in dealing with these issues. Men think that it makes them weak to seek medical assistance. If you can't fix it yourself, then let a professional help. It really is that simple.

If you expect a woman to wear high heels daily after the age of 30, then get a pair and wear them around all day yourself. At the very least go with her to the podiatrist and don't whine when he tells you how bad they are for her. If you claim to want to take care of a woman and have her be loving towards you, then don't demand she be in pain all day long. Which ties into the woman being feminine, loving and not crazy. Chronic pain colors everyone's attitude. So don't inflict it on her.

I don't know of a woman who isn't taking care of herself financially. And a stay at home mom saving the family a couple of thousand a month in costs associated with child care, prepared foods, buying professional clothes, paid assistance in running a household is not someone who is leeching off a man. Except in the eyes of a man who doesn't value his children, and therefore isn't a man any woman of quality should wish to become involved with.

If you expect a woman to indulge your fetishes on occasion, then you had better be paying for it upfront by making us feel sufficiently loved that we are willing to go beyond our comfort zone. You want sex, we want love. Why do we have to give you what you want and hope one day you might listen to what we say? Especially when that guarantees you won't listen. Why should you when you have everything without having to do anything for it?

Which brings us to that whole 'tell a man repeatedly and eventually he'll catch on'. He won't. Because if he's too selfish to listen the first time, he sure won't listen when there are no negative consequences to not listening. Men don't believe what women say until after the woman walks. By which time it's too late to say that now you're willing to go to marriage counseling. Do what needs to be done before she walks.

Honestly, most women I know don't want a man bad enough to deal with all this. Be a man of quality to begin with, which has nothing to do with your paycheck.




Whiplashsmile4 -> RE: Does it apply to D/s? Admonishment, apparently for women, seeking men for a 'vanilla' relationship? (5/22/2012 12:27:55 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: EllenofTroy

The happiest, long termed and most content of couples I've encountered accept and love each other for themselves. Better or worse. Quirks, warts and all. Throw out the laundry list, rules and general manic, anal, self imposed b*ll s*it non realistic criteria and simply love another who smiles at you like you're the only person in the world. Bodies change, careers are lost, accidents happen. Life tilts and scatters and no "list" can keep you strong during rough times. Love can. Idealistic but I'm a crazy woman who has no interest in seeing people as extension of my damn self but as unique creatures of God.


While I understand the point(s) you are making here. I disagree strongly about people being not extensions of one another. Whoever is in your life has a great impact upon you personally, just as you yourself do upon them.




LadyHibiscus -> RE: Does it apply to D/s? Admonishment, apparently for women, seeking men for a 'vanilla' relationship? (5/22/2012 12:32:15 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: MissImmortalPain

You know the funny thing is I say that to people all the time. That women are crazy and men are stupid. That you have to be crazy to put up with stupid and you have to be stupid to put up with crazy. That you need one to balance out the other.


I do too, sort of! Men and women ARE different, and that's okay, we just need to learn each other's languages and understand that we each have things we are best at. That's an explanation, not an excuse.





kalikshama -> RE: Does it apply to D/s? Admonishment, apparently for women, seeking men for a 'vanilla' relationship? (5/22/2012 12:37:35 PM)

quote:

I immediately wondered how much applies to women looking for men specifically for D/s relationships.


I'm a sub and would have passed on a profile which included that as this is also my takeaway:

quote:

Basically this guy is bitter and throwing a temper tantrum because he can't find a woman who ticks every little box he wants and isn't willing to compromise and get a personality beyond that of a horny 18 year old guy imho.




DarkSteven -> RE: Does it apply to D/s? Admonishment, apparently for women, seeking men for a 'vanilla' relationship? (5/22/2012 12:49:41 PM)

Pile of ****. The standard relationship breakers are things like attitude about money, religion, the other's family, political views - things that don't even appear on his list. In my case, I have dealbreakers about intelligence, ability to communicate clearly, caring about others, sense of humor, etc. The criteria I consider essential to a relationship don't even appear on his quest for the perfect fantasy. Hasn't that guy even been IN a relationship before?




Whiplashsmile4 -> RE: Does it apply to D/s? Admonishment, apparently for women, seeking men for a 'vanilla' relationship? (5/22/2012 1:01:39 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DarkSteven

Pile of ****. The standard relationship breakers are things like attitude about money, religion, the other's family, political views - things that don't even appear on his list. In my case, I have dealbreakers about intelligence, ability to communicate clearly, caring about others, sense of humor, etc. The criteria I consider essential to a relationship don't even appear on his quest for the perfect fantasy. Hasn't that guy even been IN a relationship before?

ummm ummmm ummmm (raised eyebrow)... when did this thread turn into one about Dealbreakers? :-/




LadyHibiscus -> RE: Does it apply to D/s? Admonishment, apparently for women, seeking men for a 'vanilla' relationship? (5/22/2012 4:46:41 PM)

Wasn't it always?




lizi -> RE: Does it apply to D/s? Admonishment, apparently for women, seeking men for a 'vanilla' relationship? (5/22/2012 5:08:18 PM)

I'm sorry, I couldn't get past the tone of the thing. It didn't seem to be addressing real people but stereotypes. If this is what relationships are like then I don't want one, seems so juvenile and flat. Tired old cliches trotted out, excuses being made, misconceptions running rampant - I'd have never read it anywhere else, started it maybe and then moved on pretty quickly.

I'd almost say it sounded manipulative at times....be feminine? I'll just keep doing my honest best in my own way, I don't think I need to be told to get a job or lose weight. It was like an article in Cosmo, I stopped reading those long ago as they never say anything new, and it's always supposedly as simple as reducing things down to a 'formula' and getting what you want. Yuck.




LadyPact -> RE: Does it apply to D/s? Admonishment, apparently for women, seeking men for a 'vanilla' relationship? (5/22/2012 5:39:28 PM)

About the only thing I agreed with as for a section was #8.  The rest came across as 'hey females, do everything you can to land a man'.  The only thing I picked up that the man was willing to do was "slay dragons". 

If the author of the piece is so good at maintaining relationships, what is he doing cruising the ads on CL? 




Baroana -> RE: Does it apply to D/s? Admonishment, apparently for women, seeking men for a 'vanilla' relationship? (5/22/2012 5:58:10 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

If the author of the piece is so good at maintaining relationships, what is he doing cruising the ads on CL? 



Yes, and with the spare time to write this magnum opus?




RaspberryLemon -> RE: Does it apply to D/s? Admonishment, apparently for women, seeking men for a 'vanilla' relationship? (5/22/2012 6:00:16 PM)

Eh, I would not say that "list" should be useful at all, to anyone. It had a couple "duh!" moments (common sense stuff--don't stay with liars, cheaters, and drug abusers, etc.) but most of it was just offensive and sexist--to both genders. Not to mention the condescending/chastizing tone of it.

In essence, THIS:
quote:

ORIGINAL: geekgamegirl
Basically this guy is bitter and throwing a temper tantrum because he can't find a woman who ticks every little box he wants and isn't willing to compromise and get a personality beyond that of a horny 18 year old guy imho.

And THIS:
quote:

ORIGINAL: lizi
I'm sorry, I couldn't get past the tone of the thing. It didn't seem to be addressing real people but stereotypes. If this is what relationships are like then I don't want one, seems so juvenile and flat. Tired old cliches trotted out, excuses being made, misconceptions running rampant - I'd have never read it anywhere else, started it maybe and then moved on pretty quickly.

I'd almost say it sounded manipulative at times....be feminine? I'll just keep doing my honest best in my own way, I don't think I need to be told to get a job or lose weight. It was like an article in Cosmo, I stopped reading those long ago as they never say anything new, and it's always supposedly as simple as reducing things down to a 'formula' and getting what you want. Yuck.


I say, let people be individuals and they'll find their own way, and connect with partners based on compatibility rather than criteria set by some bitter stranger.




Page: [1] 2 3   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875