evesgrden -> RE: When a sub is mad at you. (6/24/2012 12:43:54 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: JstAnotherSub To the OP-if you messed up, apologize. quote:
ORIGINAL: evesgrden quote:
ORIGINAL: HKPhoenix I'm a relationship therapist and one very common relationship dynamic is the distancer/persuer. We have to be careful as Dommes not to overpersue or they will overdistance. In a healthy relationship both partners need to be able to talk about the negative feelings that our partners will inadvertantly cause. So subs need to honest about their feelings or else they will distance (not good for the relationship) or they will be passive agressive(not good either) so here's my question, if subs are (in most cases) pleasers and find it hard to talk about feelings, is expecting a sub to be honest an oxymoron? I trust that you have a link to data on this? and... a "relationship therapist"???? lmao.. is that from a matchbook cover? Fyi.. "therapist" is a protected professional term, require licensure from your state governing body. It's illegal to hold yourself out as one, just like it's illegal to practice law or medicine without a license. Furthermore, just because someone describes a dynamic and gives it a label, doesn't mean it's valid or reliable. (If you don't understand the empirical implications of validity and reliability then you're in over your head.) I'm not trying to crap on your parade, and perhaps you've been helpful to some friends etc. But don't misrepresent yourself or your abilities.. it will ultimately cause more harm than good. Google results for relationship therapist To the above person, please don't try to misrepresent your knowledge regarding what others call them selves. Although known by several names, relationship therapy is well known as legit. quote:
. Guilty of a knee-jerk post here. It's just bloody hard to find any form of therapy which isn't ultimately about relationships. And I know this because I've been licensed in various states, ivy league graduate school, had my own practice, designed programs, got places accredited with the Joint Commission, written policies and procedures, been published yada yada. etc. Furthermore, the whole distancer/pursuer concepts started with Murray Bowen ( a kingpin in the biz IMO) and then Fogerty (a protege of his from the 70's) who ran with it. So for folks to be talking about "relationship therapy" and the whole approach/avoidance or rose-by-any-other-name-yet-again dynamic pisses me off as if this info will help the OP, pushed a button for me. Even if she's licensed, saying "we as dommes have to be careful not to overpursue" is just psychobabble to me. I.e., the jargon isn't helpful. Just call it what it is. Dominants don't have a monopoly on pursuit (sheesh... my friggin' email which I can't even keep up with is testimony to that). Pursuit is typically manifest by the person with the least power in the relationship (and that's fluid by the way). In this case the dominant is pursuing, and therefore has the least (functional) power. Chasing someone who feels they have good reason to stay away from you is not going to work. We don't need jargon to tell us that, even if it's packaged as new and improved jargon. (And I still think it's childish to give anyone the silent treatment... which is qualitatively different from calming down so that you can digest what happened and then make a rational decision about how you want to handle it.)
|
|
|
|