RE: Cyberattacks against Iran (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message

Musicmystery -> RE: Cyberattacks against Iran (6/4/2012 1:13:16 PM)

Yeah. It speaks to you as an ignorant asshole.

We've been at war with Iran since 1953. Overthrowing their elected government will do that.

Learn some fucking history. And take a reading comprehension class. Then get off the fucking playground and learn to discuss like an intelligent adult.

Might they perceive cyberattacks and a whole lot more as an act of war? For fuck's sake, of course, you babbling baboon.

Here. Read. Slowly. Move your lips if you need to.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran%E2%80%93United_States_relations

You and I are done. I don't have time for this shit.



Anaxagoras -> RE: Cyberattacks against Iran (6/4/2012 4:34:19 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead
quote:

ORIGINAL: SternSkipper
quote:

Of course not. An "act of war" is having fuck all to do with a couple of ugly buildings getting knocked over in New York.

Not so fast to unleash your Leprechauns on the Ohioan, are ya? Ya lipstick wearin housecat!


[image]http://www.jokefile.co.uk/computer_jokes/pic31661.jpg[/image]

As I already pointed out, we stopped using the manual viruses a few years back after the Brits finally learned how to deal with them... [:D]



DesideriScuri -> RE: Cyberattacks against Iran (6/4/2012 7:23:28 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery
Yeah. It speaks to you as an ignorant asshole.
We've been at war with Iran since 1953. Overthrowing their elected government will do that.
Learn some fucking history. And take a reading comprehension class. Then get off the fucking playground and learn to discuss like an intelligent adult.


Wow, touched a sore spot there getting you to actually answer a question directly. Damn.

quote:


Might they perceive cyberattacks and a whole lot more as an act of war? For fuck's sake, of course, you babbling baboon.


OMG!!! He can answer a question directly!! Holy shit, Batman!

So, now that we are there (and, I do know that we've been pretty much jacking the Middle East around for a Gawd awful long time), are you now going to tell me that we've been fucking them for almost 60 years, so they aren't going to do anything if we continue?

And, just so you know, when someone asks if you think something is an act of war, responding by saying that we have been essentially at war with them for almost 60 years isn't actually answering the question.

So, feel free to take your balls and go home. I have a great feeling that I won't miss you at all. Enjoy.



ResidentSadist -> RE: Cyberattacks against Iran (6/4/2012 8:43:01 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

I doubt it. We've been fucking with them since Eisenhower orchestrated the coup in 1953 under the guise of fighting communism.

Despite the "nuke-em" rhetoric thrown around sometimes, we can't do that. The weapons we have today are literally 20 times more powerful than the ones dropped on Japan. Look at the long range effects of just a radiation leak. Now imagine dropping these bombs. It would effect the entire globe for years and years.


I wonder if fuel-air bombs are hot enough to melt sand into glass? I know the shock wave is a real beast.



DomKen -> RE: Cyberattacks against Iran (6/4/2012 8:48:23 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: ResidentSadist


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

I doubt it. We've been fucking with them since Eisenhower orchestrated the coup in 1953 under the guise of fighting communism.

Despite the "nuke-em" rhetoric thrown around sometimes, we can't do that. The weapons we have today are literally 20 times more powerful than the ones dropped on Japan. Look at the long range effects of just a radiation leak. Now imagine dropping these bombs. It would effect the entire globe for years and years.


I wonder if fuel-air bombs are hot enough to melt sand into glass? I know the shock wave is a real beast.

Probably not. The blast just doesn't last lomg emough to transfer that much heat.



Musicmystery -> RE: Cyberattacks against Iran (6/4/2012 9:01:53 PM)

quote:

I wonder if fuel-air bombs are hot enough to melt sand into glass?


I just did some looking around on the Internet, and I don't think so.

Sand melts at 1700 degrees F, which will give you something glassy. To get real glass, you need a much more controlled process. The main ingredient, quartz, melts at twice that.

Fuel-air bombs don't need lots of heat, just denotation. The temperature varies greatly depending on environmental factors, but an upper end seems still under 1000 degrees F, so no, no sand. Just a lot of destruction from igniting plastics, clothing, and anything in a powder (flour, dust, cocoa, etc.). And yeah, a nasty shock wave, coming and going.



Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875