fucktoyprincess
Posts: 2337
Status: offline
|
Well according to the following, it would appear that while the WMA does prohibit (as a matter of ethics, not law) "discrimination" against patients due to religion, nationality, race, party politics or social standing, it does not specify sexual orientation (of course, it was last amended in 1983, so probably due for an amendment on that front. quote:
Declaration of Geneva of the World Medical Association (adopted 1948, amended 1966 and 1983): I solemnly pledge myself to consecrate my life to the service of humanity; I will give my teachers the respect and gratitude which is their due; I will practice my profession with conscience and dignity; The health of my patient will be my first consideration; I will respect the secrets which are confided in me, even after the patient has died; I will maintain by all the means in my power, the honor and the noble traditions of the medical profession; My colleagues will be my brothers; I will not permit considerations of religion, nationality, race, party politics or social standing to intervene between my duty and my patient; I will maintain the utmost respect for human life from its beginning even under threat and I will not use my medical knowledge contrary to the laws of humanity; I make these promises solemnly, freely and upon my honor. More interesting is the following: quote:
American Medical Association Code of Ethics (post- 1980) Preamble: The medical profession has long subscribed to a body of ethical statements developed primarily for the benefit of the patient. As a member of this profession, a physician must recognize responsibility not only to patients, but also to society, to other health professionals, and to self. The following Principles adopted by the [AMA] are not laws, but standards of conduct which define the essentials of honorable behavior for the physician. II. A physician shall deal honestly with patients and colleagues, and strive to expose those physicians deficient in character or competence, or who engage in fraud or deception. III. A physician shall respect the law and also recognize a responsibility to seek changes in those requirements which are contrary to the best interests of the patient. IV. A physician shall respect the rights of patients, of colleagues, and of other health professionals, and shall safeguard patient confidences within the constraints of the law. VI. A physician shall, in the provision of appropriate patient care, except in emergencies, be free to choose whom to serve, with whom to associate, and the environment in which to provide medical services. VII. A physician shall recognize a responsibility to participate in activities contributing to an improved community. Certainly, ethically, what happened does not actually appear to be prohibited. While the medication is critical, the situation would not be considered emergency care medically. It begs the question, though, of whether this actually ought to be the case or not. I understand that ethically we don't ever want a doctor to feel they have zero choice about who to serve - they are still free agents and should be free to not take on a patient if they choose to do so. But clearly, as a society, we need to ensure that all members of our society have access to quality medical care somewhere by someone. Otherwise there is a serious issue. Also, while the specific doctor in question appears to be within their ethical rights to be free to choose not to serve this patient, I'm not sure the hospital as a whole can also make this claim as the AMA Code is specific to individual doctors and does not apply to institutions as a whole. It would seem that the hospital, perhaps, cannot refuse (which is why the hospital and not the doctor are being sued). So, it would appear, at some level, our medical care is subject to the personal beliefs of individual doctors. Which is fine if one lives in an area where there are many choices of doctors. But what if you are somewhere where there is only a few doctors for miles around and they are all anti-homosexuality? What, exactly, is one supposed to do then?
_____________________________
~ ftp
|