RE: Will Mitt`s "cop-kink" get him in trouble? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


SternSkipper -> RE: Will Mitt`s "cop-kink" get him in trouble? (6/8/2012 1:05:47 PM)

quote:

eta- sounds like those scary anti-Romney ads of Obamas are working..


There's a site constructed by a group of local Massachusetts Citizens that lays out Mitt's record as Governor that I'll post in a separate post. But I disagree ... One is less dangerous and IT AIN'T MITT
... But I know you like your euphemistic 'everything's fixed' rap ... so don't let me get in the way. I didn't feel in in anyway constrained by your post... but rather ... just one more opportunity to get out the opposing point of view.



[image]local://upfiles/18637/08B36CB8C1FB49C691FEE0CA0A270A23.gif[/image]




tj444 -> RE: Will Mitt`s "cop-kink" get him in trouble? (6/8/2012 2:38:59 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: SternSkipper

quote:

eta- sounds like those scary anti-Romney ads of Obamas are working..


There's a site constructed by a group of local Massachusetts Citizens that lays out Mitt's record as Governor that I'll post in a separate post. But I disagree ... One is less dangerous and IT AIN'T MITT
... But I know you like your euphemistic 'everything's fixed' rap ... so don't let me get in the way. I didn't feel in in anyway constrained by your post... but rather ... just one more opportunity to get out the opposing point of view.


everythings fixed??? Dude,.. I dont think anything is fixed!




SternSkipper -> RE: Will Mitt`s "cop-kink" get him in trouble? (6/8/2012 5:13:35 PM)

quote:


everythings fixed??? Dude,.. I dont think anything is fixed!


Dudette .. I mean as in "rigged".
And you're all over that concept.
Relax, I am just putting belief systems in perspective




tj444 -> RE: Will Mitt`s "cop-kink" get him in trouble? (6/9/2012 6:00:46 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SternSkipper

quote:


everythings fixed??? Dude,.. I dont think anything is fixed!


Dudette .. I mean as in "rigged".
And you're all over that concept.
Relax, I am just putting belief systems in perspective

Yes,.. it definately is rigged.. That is quite disillusioning to me.. I know in the US its take no prisoners but just how ruthless and nasty it gets is mindboggling to me.. Not just on the Federal level, but all the way down the line.. how business and money can influence "city hall".. from eminent domain which is stealing for developer profit to prison slave labor for mega corp profit.. how govt and business (especially big business) are in bed together.. it leaves such a distaste,.. if you want to succeed in business in the US, do you really have to sell your soul that way?




truckinslave -> RE: Will Mitt`s "cop-kink" get him in trouble? (6/9/2012 7:14:48 AM)

One can almost smell the fear...

Dorn, Ayers, Wright, New Party... no big deal.

Owning a police uniform in college, now that's a big deal.
You guys are hilarious.




Moonhead -> RE: Will Mitt`s "cop-kink" get him in trouble? (6/9/2012 7:30:13 AM)

"Fear" /= "contempt"




Owner59 -> RE: Will Mitt`s "cop-kink" get him in trouble? (6/9/2012 6:08:23 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: truckinslave

One can almost smell the fear...

Dorn, Ayers, Wright, New Party... no big deal.

Owning a police uniform in college, now that's a big deal.
You guys are hilarious.
 



Pulling drivers over with a fake flashing red light?

That`s what ted bundy did.......

What will be hilarious.....will be Mitt`s "explanation".....

We don`t need any explanation tho,why cons would do satan.....if it won them an election.......[:D]




SternSkipper -> RE: Will Mitt`s "cop-kink" get him in trouble? (6/9/2012 7:11:46 PM)

quote:

New Party


New party?
YOU'RE JOKING?
HOW is the NeoKlan... Excuse me .... the Tea Party, A PARTY?
Its hard for people to really tell from the outside and the republican estimates vary wildly depending on the claim they're trying to support.




fucktoyprincess -> RE: Will Mitt`s "cop-kink" get him in trouble? (6/10/2012 8:04:01 PM)

Well, I already dislike him as a candidate. And this just reinforces his tremendous sense of entitlement that he seems to have. It is not the kind of person that I think we need running the country.

Oddly, the leftist leaning politics of Obama when he was younger at least point to someone who cared about the weak and poor in society. One can argue philosophically about whether Communism can actually work in practice, but socialist ideas are behind our social safety net. So our politics and policies, as a nation, already embrace socialist principles.

Do I think what people did in the past is important? I particularly think it is important when it shows us how someone treats other people - especially if it appears that they have not changed. Sometimes that is a good thing, and sometimes a bad. So for me, things like prior drug use matters less (provided someone is not currently using drugs). But behavior that shows contempt of others (bullying, strapping a dog to the car, pretending to be a cop and using that authority to infringe on other's rights) all show how someone treats other people. I'm not interested in a leader who seems to show repeatedly that he feels he is entitled to treat others poorly. I don't doubt that there are others who feel similarly. And I am also sure there are people who could care less how badly Romney treated others - after all, one doesn't care about this aspect of his behavior unless one actually cares about other people oneself. [sm=2cents.gif]




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875