Anaxagoras
Posts: 3086
Joined: 5/9/2009 From: Eire Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: fucktoyprincess quote:
ORIGINAL: Anaxagoras quote:
ORIGINAL: fucktoyprincess Which brings me to my next point. Conservatives who go on and on about wanting low or no taxes should consider what happens to a nation when everyone starts to have the attitude that taxes are the "government stealing their hard earned money". I would actually rather have big government, then to entirely erode the tax base, and end up with the economy collapsing. Those who want low to no taxes and small government - be careful what you wish for. Such a policy only helps the very rich (who simply hide their money). And the country as a whole cannot sustain it - not at all. We need taxes. We need to have the proper attitude towards taxes. And we need a government who is willing to enforce the tax laws. So what does Greece tell us? That conservative economic tax policies are utterly misguided. I agree with your analysis of Greece but I think the problem with the country was that it developed a major state infrastructure due to the long term rule of the left-wing Panhellenic Socialist Movement, which it was unable to fund in the long term due to the failure to pull in taxes from all sectors of the economy so the observation about Republicans doesn't automatically follow because they wish to slim down government in accordance with lower taxes, in contrast to Greece. One of the major problems with Greece was the fact that it lied about its deficits to gain entry into the Euro in 2000, and continued to spend heavily year on year since then. The political establishment treated the EU/EEC as a cash cow e.g. openly threatening to veto the entry of several countries into the EEC in 1985 to get more money. Maybe that's what Republicans say. But it's not what they do. It's pretty difficult to wage war in multiple areas of the globe without spending some money. I don't think even Romney wants to wage war after the relative defeats in Afghanistan and Iraq. quote:
It seems to me we are all better off acknowledging that any meaningful decrease in government spending is unlikely unless Americans are actually willing to give up infrastructure, education, health, redistributive programs or the Defense budget. None of these are things that most Americans actually want to do without. So, at the end of the day, conservatives, of any stripe, can call for lower/no taxes. But the reality of what that means is not a society that most Americans want. Where I am from sybstantive savings were derived from improving the efficiency, and re-organising the spending of the State. An entire house of parliament is also being closed. There can be cuts made without harming services much. Having said that, such restructuring can only go so far. I tend to be somewhere in the middle of the big-little government debate.
_____________________________
"That woman, as nature has created her, and man at present is educating her, is man's enemy. She can only be his slave or his despot, but never his companion." (Venus in Furs)
|