males....... less male (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


swingdom1970 -> males....... less male (6/26/2012 10:18:33 PM)

Its a fact




stef -> RE: males....... less male (6/26/2012 10:23:42 PM)

1. Statements like this are often better received with some sort of credible support attached.

2. What does this have to do with BDSM?




GreedyTop -> RE: males....... less male (6/26/2012 10:27:36 PM)

is this another lame attempt at "comedy"?




peppermint -> RE: males....... less male (6/26/2012 10:28:38 PM)

Where can I read those statistics on fertility rates?  There have always been people with fertility problems.  It's nothing new. 




littlewonder -> RE: males....... less male (6/26/2012 10:32:17 PM)

more like the modern world is seeing many boys growing up without fathers and male role models, therefore they were raised by their wives and women have become the gender that is now the ones who are going to college with males not attending as much and flying up the ladder of success faster than men. So no it has nothing to do with chemicals and additives and all to do with human nature.




MistressDarkArt -> RE: males....... less male (6/26/2012 10:41:07 PM)

Hey, I'm all for zero- or negative-population growth. There are too many unwanted children as it is.

As for the gov't being responsible for less fertility via food sources...people make their own choices what they put in their bodies.




LadyHibiscus -> RE: males....... less male (6/26/2012 10:51:33 PM)

People are breeding madly as far as I can tell. Negative population growth is just fine with me.




swingdom1970 -> RE: males....... less male (6/26/2012 11:02:14 PM)

Its a fact ....ffs i already stated that as for what its got to do with bdsm masculinity wtf . this is one of those troll sites




CRYPTICLXVI -> RE: males....... less male (6/26/2012 11:08:04 PM)

[image]http://ladyboyjesus.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/do-not-feed-the-troll-500x285.png[/image]




NiceButMeanGirl -> RE: males....... less male (6/26/2012 11:30:54 PM)

I guess I missed the OP before it was edited. But if this is another just like his other thread, it doesn't matter anyway.[8|]




CRYPTICLXVI -> RE: males....... less male (6/26/2012 11:42:22 PM)

OP gone from both sides...
So for your entertainment




GreedyTop -> RE: males....... less male (6/27/2012 3:31:05 AM)

heheh..love that vid!!




Gladiaticus -> RE: males....... less male (6/27/2012 6:19:23 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: stef
2. What does this have to do with BDSM?


He's punishing us.




kalikshama -> RE: males....... less male (6/27/2012 6:31:45 AM)

What did it say before he edited it?




ChatteParfaitt -> RE: males....... less male (6/27/2012 6:34:10 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: swingdom1970

Its a fact


I love it !! *Facts* about maleness (or the lack of it) and the trollishness of CM from a dood who's username is "swingdom."

It speaks of creditability folks !!






LadyHibiscus -> RE: males....... less male (6/27/2012 6:35:55 AM)

Kalik, it was about food additives making fertility rates drop in men, or some such. Wheeee!




GreedyTop -> RE: males....... less male (6/27/2012 6:37:21 AM)

IIRC, it was that the additives only affected DOMINANT men. I could be wrong though.

ETA: I took it to be another of the OPs "jokes"




LadyHibiscus -> RE: males....... less male (6/27/2012 6:39:47 AM)

Oh I read it to mean that men were being made less manly generally... which in itself is tripe. Seven billion people, right? Takes two and all that, even if a turkey baster is the intermediary.





kalikshama -> RE: males....... less male (6/27/2012 7:01:20 AM)

This could be what he meant:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/8047230.stm

Chemical cocktail 'risk to boys'

Chemicals found in many food and cosmetic products pose a real threat to male fertility, a leading scientist has warned.

Professor Richard Sharpe, of the Medical Research Council, warned these hormone-disrupting chemicals were "feminising" boys in the womb.

He linked them to raising rates of birth defects and testicular cancer and falling sperm counts.

Campaigners called for action to address the problem.

They warned that while exposure to a single chemical may cause no harm, the cumulative effect could be profound.

Professor Sharpe's report was commissioned by the CHEM Trust, a charity which works to protect humans and wildlife from harmful chemicals.

There is evidence that male reproductive health is deteriorating, with malformations of the penis becoming more common, rates of testicular cancer rising, and sperm counts falling.

It is thought that all these conditions - collectively called Testicular Dysgenesis Syndrome (TDS) - are linked to disruption of the male sex hormone testosterone.

Professor Sharpe concludes that exposure to a cocktail of hormone-disrupting chemicals in the environment is likely to be at least partly to blame by blocking the action of testosterone in the womb.

His latest report highlights animal studies showing that testosterone-disrupting chemicals can cause TDS-like disorders.

In addition, de-masculinisation effects due to chemical pollutants in the environment has been reported in many species of wildlife.

The direct evidence of an effect in humans is so far less compelling - but is beginning to mount.

HORMONE DISRUPTORS

Chemicals in consumer products and food that have been reported to disrupt the sex hormones include:

Phthalates: Found in vinyl flooring, plastics, soaps, toothpaste

Bisphenol: Found in babies' bottles, food can linings. mobile phones, computers

Pesticides: Including pyrethroids, linuron, vinclozolin and fenitrothion




kalikshama -> RE: males....... less male (6/27/2012 7:21:20 AM)

Michael Pollan's, "Food Rules: An Eater's Manual" is the distillation of 10 years of work, reporting on food, agriculture and health and just boiling it down. It's a book you can read in an hour.

...

#2 Don't eat anything your great grandmother wouldn't recognize as food

The reasons to avoid eating such complicated food products are many, and go beyond the various chemical additives and corn and soy derivatives they contain, or the plastics in which they are typically packaged, some of which are probably toxic. Today's foods are processed in ways specifically designed to get us to buy and eat more by pushing our evolutionary buttons - our inborn preferences for sweetness and fat and salt. These tastes are difficult to find in nature but cheap and easy for the food scientist to deploy, with the result that food processing induces us to consume much more of thee rarities than is good for us. The Great Grandma Rule will help keep most of these out of your cart

# 3 Avoid food products containing ingredients no ordinary human would keep in the pantry.

Ethoxylated diglycerides? Celluose? Xanthan gum? Calcium propionate? Ammonium sulfate? If you wouldn’t cook with them yourself, why let others use these ingredients to cook for you? The food scientists’ chemistry set is designed to extend shelf life, make old food look fresher and more appetizing than it really is, and get you to eat more. Whether or not any of these additives pose a proven hazard to your health, many of them haven’t been eaten by humans for very long, so they are best avoided

#11 Avoid foods you see advertised on television.

Food marketers are ingenious at turning criticisms of their products -- and rules like these -- into new ways to sell slightly different versions of the same processed foods: They simply reformulate (to be low-fat, have no HFCS or transfats, or to contain fewer ingredients) and then boast about their implied healthfulness, whether the boast is meaningful or not. The best way to escape these marketing ploys is to tune out the marketing itself, by refusing to buy heavily promoted foods. Only the biggest food manufacturers can afford to advertise their products on television: More than two thirds of food advertising is spent promoting processed foods (and alcohol), so if you avoid products with big ad budgets, you'll automatically be avoiding edible foodlike substances. As for the 5 percent of food ads that promote whole foods (the prune or walnut growers or the beef ranchers), common sense will, one hopes, keep you from tarring them with the same brush -- these are the exceptions that prove the rule.

#19 If it came from a plant, eat it; if it was made in a plant, don't.

#36 Don't eat breakfast cereals that change the color of the milk.


This should go without saying. Such cereals are highly processed and full of refined carbohydrates as well as chemical additives.





Page: [1] 2 3   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125