RE: The Wrath Of cons........ (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Yachtie -> RE: The Wrath Of cons........ (7/1/2012 6:19:01 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: defiantbadgirl

My father thinks Roberts did it because he doesn't want to be remembered in history books years from now as the killer of health care reform. It makes sense to me too.



My bet is that far future historians will regard Roberts unfavorably, to the same extent that Chamberlain is viewed in retrospect and for some even Benedict Arnold.




hlen5 -> RE: The Wrath Of cons........ (7/1/2012 7:25:10 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

IN a Court that typically votes on partisan lines...whoever "decides" the case (not Kennedy this time) gets to be the critical 5th vote.


My point is why wasn't Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, or Kagan the 5th vote? Did the others somehow vote "before" Roberts? Is there a roll call vote? Why wasn't Ginsburg's the 5th vote?




Musicmystery -> RE: The Wrath Of cons........ (7/1/2012 7:36:17 AM)

I thought I just answered that.

If the earlier votes, due to the partisan divide in the court, are essentially taken for granted, the swing votes are the ones needed for 5, hence, the 5th vote. It's a tally consideration, not a chronological series of Ayes and Nays.




Owner59 -> RE: The Wrath Of cons........ (7/1/2012 9:02:50 AM)


Is it a coincidence that the lunatic fringe believes that one day bush jr.........will be regarded favorably?




Lucylastic -> RE: The Wrath Of cons........ (7/1/2012 9:08:12 AM)

lets face it even Hitler has his fans, of course its likely he willl be , hell he already is.:)




Moonhead -> RE: The Wrath Of cons........ (7/1/2012 9:09:29 AM)

The chimp may well end up looking good next to Romney, put it that way.
[;)]




Lucylastic -> RE: The Wrath Of cons........ (7/1/2012 9:15:05 AM)

I have a feeling we wont find out. At least this cycle




Moonhead -> RE: The Wrath Of cons........ (7/1/2012 9:19:11 AM)

I hope not.
Even a PM with as little backbone, testicular fortitude and intestines as Cameron won't be able to brown nose that fuckwit with a straight face, will he? Even Milliband may not be up to the job...




Lucylastic -> RE: The Wrath Of cons........ (7/1/2012 9:23:53 AM)

I think Roberts is being paid by Mitt to take the heat of his utter lack of competence. Giving him a boost because he sure as hell couldnt win on his platform, competence or ability.




Moonhead -> RE: The Wrath Of cons........ (7/1/2012 9:25:03 AM)

Neither could the chimp, and he spent two terms in power.
He only had to fiddle the first election as well...




Lucylastic -> RE: The Wrath Of cons........ (7/1/2012 9:29:14 AM)

True dat, BUT he wasnt facing an incumbent.. even one with as many issues as the right are throwing at him. Not that he hasnt got a tide of troubles.




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125