RE: Newbies who are looking for trainers... ??? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


zumala -> RE: Newbies who are looking for trainers... ??? (6/8/2006 9:45:34 PM)

They may try, but the ones dumb enough or arrogant enough to try it are TONS of fun to smack down.  [;)]
 
zuma




SweetSarijane -> RE: Newbies who are looking for trainers... ??? (6/8/2006 10:04:35 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: zumala

They may try, but the ones dumb enough or arrogant enough to try it are TONS of fun to smack down.  [;)]
 
zuma


[sm=tongue.gif] rofl......oh hell yeah!




HollyS -> RE: Newbies who are looking for trainers... ??? (6/8/2006 10:14:07 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Emperor1956

...isn't pre-Cana "training" supposed to help teach couples about to be married how to be married?  


*smiles*  Well know, not even Catholic magic thinks it can accomplish that in the course of a weekend retreat or a couple of meetings with a priest.  Pre-Cana is meant to raise important issues related to marriage (such as kids, job issues, how to handle disagreements, etc...).  If someone could actually come up with a program that taught engaged couples how to build a successful marriage, they'd be rich. 

quote:

You are trained every day, every minute you are with someone you call your "Dom", "Master", whatever.  Just like I am trained every minute I'm with My girl.  We avoid that which doesn't work, doesn't make us feel good, doesn't please -- that's training, folks.
 

Yes, I have to agree with this.  Everytime we learn from our partner, we adjust for the future.  Some people don't like the term "training" because it is so often applied to animals and children.  But I was a professional tech trainer for 15 years -- I understand how adults learn and it's not all that different.  The person has to want to learn new skills, be receptive to the information and be willing to practice until proficiency is gained.  Works equally well with serving a formal dinner and being an attentive listener, throwing a flogger and how to give fabulous oral service. 

quote:

But that training to a service-oriented submissive is MUCH MORE than acquiring a technical skill.  Service oriented submissives love the SERVICE; the sex is fun, but it is incidental. 


This may be the hardest thing for people who've never met a service-type to understand.  What makes a person service-oriented is that they enjoy being "useful" for it's own sake.  They strive to give or serve before being told what to do and try to exceed the expectations defined for them by their Owners.  Many are workaholics and perfectionists - details matter and it's important to know what is proper before acting, through attentiveness and anticipation of the Owner's needs.  In many ways it's a spiritual thing, putting one's energy into the universe through outstanding service to another. 

For me, sex is a form of service.  Taking pain is a form of service.  Floggers, paddles, cuffs...  those are all kinky things but they do not, by default, mark a D/s relationship.  I would still serve even if I was rarely allowed sex or kink for myself, so long as I knew I was a pleasing and valued servant.  It's a hard concept for most people, I know.  But it's what I was taught when I was new to this l/s and what feeds my soul.  I have to serve... or I don't feel whole.

To be thrilled at the touch of leather, aroused by the sound of harsh words, or satisfied by the security of rigid bondage is the mark of a lover.
To be thrilled at the opportunity to provide useful service, aroused by a pleased nod, and satisfied by the proverbial job well done, is the mark of a slave.

It may sound severe.  Almost anti-erotic.  Until you see two people, owner and owned, existing in a complementary relationship where each suits the other like balances on a delicate scale.

(from The Marketplace, by Laura Antoniou, available through Mystic Rose Books)

~Holly




mnottertail -> RE: Newbies who are looking for trainers... ??? (6/8/2006 10:29:33 PM)

so...........

at least where you stand...............
If this lays somewhere out of mind.

You and your husband submissive looks for a trainer, who will obviously be of such power and presence that you recognize it inheirantly (forget spelling from now on) as the niche in which your secret ganglion live. By some undetermined magic, this being will impart some extraterrestrial knowledge that contains the holy grail of kink that enlightens you to the breakfast cereal that you will joyously eat everyday for breakfast (problem solved) and if by chance, you have been prestidigitously buffooned you are capable of slinging such shit that amphenol is like a small nucular (god, I have waited since the days of LBJ to spell that word that way)  fart compared to your wrath.

OK, heres the news........

There is no larger issue here.

Sit on his face and piss in his mouth........softly.
Think of it as you giving a breast to a child.........you nurture him.

When you suck his dick.......consider that you are are recieving his nourishment (as he can provide)

This is fucking stupid. 

We all have this place, you see.........
We are adults and can not play games anymore.........

I don't know how many times that Female Masters have told me that there first facing this abyss centered around tying sombody up when they were playing cowboys and indians........or some such childs gaem.

That is the big news, this is a game of children that know sex.

enough,
Ron 




LuckyAlbatross -> RE: Newbies who are looking for trainers... ??? (6/9/2006 5:47:15 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: servicing
Lol, think you all are being way too harsh and judgemental.  Freakin "noobie frenzy"  Lol, oh I don't like the word training so if you use it you must be stupid.

Uh I actually like the word and concept of training and use it in all of my relationships.

What's stupid is rushing into a relationship out of a need to simply have SOME relationship, without taking time to get your wits about you.

quote:

 Nothing wrong with someone new seeking someone who'll teach them.  They certainly aren't misrepresenting.

Freakin A, get off the high horse.

Except for the fact that most newbies let their lust take over their common sense and find ANYONE who sounds cool enough and gives them enough attention to convince them to be their teacher.




peterK50 -> RE: Newbies who are looking for trainers... ??? (6/9/2006 5:52:25 AM)

I don't think there is a right or wrong here. If a sub/slave feels s/he wants training first then what's the harm? If s/he wants to learn from the Dom/me s/he will serve from the ground up well that's fine too.




LuckyAlbatross -> RE: Newbies who are looking for trainers... ??? (6/9/2006 6:03:23 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: peterK50
I don't think there is a right or wrong here. If a sub/slave feels s/he wants training first then what's the harm? If s/he wants to learn from the Dom/me s/he will serve from the ground up well that's fine too.

I agree, the concept of training in itself is actually a pretty darned good one.  And if novices were keeping their wits about them, seeking actual long term training and discipline, not just a few hot scenes and fucks, and didn't just fall for the guy who got their panties all wet and sounded all wise- I'd be the first one to shove newbies into training.

But that's not how it works.

Somehow this thread went from "Why do clueless newbies plunge themselves into a frenzy of NEEDING training right off when what they want (a personal relationship) they already have the skills for?" into discussing the merits of training in the scene in general.

Not a bad thing, but definitely a swerve from the path.




marieToo -> RE: Newbies who are looking for trainers... ??? (6/9/2006 6:49:30 AM)

General Reply:


I think its all in the meaning of the word training here. 

"Training" within your relationship with the Dom/Master that a submissive chooses as his/her parnter, has a different meaning (I think) than newbies looking for "teachers" to "train" them *for* a particular relationship.  The latter seems preposturous to me.  But thats just me.




cloudboy -> RE: Newbies who are looking for trainers... ??? (6/9/2006 7:13:38 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Proprietrix


I see a lot of people coming into the lifestyle saying they are looking for a good trainer or proper training.
It makes me very curious.

Aren’t relationships more a "learn as you go" kind of thing?


Subs have an expectation that Dommes have "expertise," namely: teaching, correctional, and managment skills. This might be quite the misplaced assumption, but I don't think subs can be derided for wanting or needing this in the beginning of their venture into BDSM.

My first two live experiences with Dominant women were with individuals who had no method and who seemed to be just winging it. As a result, my relationship to them was awkward, confusing and unsatisfying. Then I actually did meet someone with "expertise, teaching, correctional and managment skills" who put these together into a method. Upon meeting her, I felt I had my first initiation into BDSM.

Just like any intiator, teacher, or leader in a particular field ---- a DOMME needs a method --- and through that method they instill a mindset and discipline in their eager pupil, who soaks up guidance and training like sponge.

For other reading on the subject I suggest you read thetammyjo .




Crittersmaster -> RE: Newbies who are looking for trainers... ??? (6/9/2006 7:31:06 AM)

A good question would be how to determine if someone is "qualified" to provide that training in the first place? And even then, what would be the method of instruction?

Honestly I can't imagine I would want someone to straight out offer me any sort of instruction on how to be a dom, but I might want some advice on how to do something specific like knife play or some other method. Then again, that is me. But, if asked, I could give someone advise on how to set up any training program (not necessarily BDSM) because I have a great deal of experience in this area and have found the skills, knowledge, and attitude helpful when deciding how I want to "train" my sub. Determining training objectives, standards to be met, being a coach, mentor, and role model, and setting systems of rewards and punishments can be so complex and very consuming of time and effort. But the rewards can be immense. And that point where the student (in BDSM the sub) finally masters the task, attitude, or whatever it is you are working on can be very satisfying. I love a well trained and disciplined sub!

Enough of my rambling.




zumala -> RE: Newbies who are looking for trainers... ??? (6/9/2006 9:05:03 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

so...........

at least where you stand...............
If this lays somewhere out of mind.

You and your husband submissive looks for a trainer, who will obviously be of such power and presence that you recognize it inheirantly (forget spelling from now on) as the niche in which your secret ganglion live. By some undetermined magic, this being will impart some extraterrestrial knowledge that contains the holy grail of kink that enlightens you to the breakfast cereal that you will joyously eat everyday for breakfast (problem solved) and if by chance, you have been prestidigitously buffooned you are capable of slinging such shit that amphenol is like a small nucular (god, I have waited since the days of LBJ to spell that word that way)  fart compared to your wrath.

OK, heres the news........

There is no larger issue here.

Sit on his face and piss in his mouth........softly.
Think of it as you giving a breast to a child.........you nurture him.

When you suck his dick.......consider that you are are recieving his nourishment (as he can provide)

This is fucking stupid. 

We all have this place, you see.........
We are adults and can not play games anymore.........

I don't know how many times that Female Masters have told me that there first facing this abyss centered around tying sombody up when they were playing cowboys and indians........or some such childs gaem.

That is the big news, this is a game of children that know sex.

enough,
Ron 



Are you talking to me specifically, or just rambling?  Your post made no sense to me.
 
zuma




Padriag -> RE: Newbies who are looking for trainers... ??? (6/9/2006 4:25:01 PM)

So many points to address.  Seems the topic of training always generates a strong reaction in so many.  Sometimes I wonder how much the dynamic of such debates would be changed if the word teaching were substituted for training where it appears.  They're really the same thing, training is about teaching.  Its about imparting knowledge, skills and behaviors... no more and no less.  There is always a vocal group who claims not to need any form of training... and the dog metaphor always comes up.  So here's a thought... are medical students dogs?  How about firemen?  Police officers?  Soldiers?  IT technicians?  Electricians?  They all go through quite a bit of training to learn their jobs, to learn the skills and knowledge necessary.  If those adults needed training, what makes anyone else any better than them?

quote:

ORIGINAL: zumala
Let's say you have someone coming from a 'nilla lifestyle who's only recently discovered they're submissive.  They have NO clue what to do.  They can't just waltz off and grab a Master because he could turn out to be someone who abuses them.  They can't answer questions about what they do or don't like, because they've never experienced anything like what is done in BDSM.  So they sit there, wondering how to safely get started...  Ah-ha!  What if I got a Mentor?  Someone to help me figure out what I would and wouldn't like.  Someone to help me ease into my local scene?

I think that is exactly what some are doing.  But I also think there is something else at work.  Being a submissive, and especially a slave, is a big commitment.  It can be scary as hell to make.  One way I've seen some deal with it is looking for a "mentor" as kind of temporary dominant... a way to get their feet wet without making a long term commitment.  Less scary that way.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Quivver
My Point is such that Service is an individual thing, one learns what the other likes and goes out of their way to provide it.  But in Training, as Ron said eventually it's gonna come down to sex.  Bottom line is why bother finding a trainer to phuck?

Service isn't always an individual thing.  I think you're making a couple of false assumptions.  First, you're assuming that there are no forms of service that are basic, or that learning basic forms of service (even if they aren't used later) isn't useful in itself.  Second, you're assuming it all comes down to sex, and that this is always the case... that everyone in this lifestyle is in it for sex.  Both assumptions are wrong.

As has already been pointed out, training will teach, if nothing else, basic obedience.  And that is not something that comes naturally to all submissives... for some its a battle.  Western culture stresses individuality and personal freedom to the point of it being a fault.  It does very little to equip someone mentally or emotionally for a submissive role.  And there are a number of general things that can be taught as part of training.  I'll cover that further on.

Neither is sex the only goal, or even a goal.  For some its all about the whips and chains, and no sex or sexual contact is involved.  Don't believe me, visit a few clubs with dungeons or some major events.  You'll run into plenty of people who just want someone to flog or to flog them, no sex involved.  For others its all about service, they just want someone to serve.  It my experience male submissives seem more inclined to this than female submissives, which I've always found to be an interesting phenomenon.

quote:

ORIGINAL: marieToo
But who would do this training?  Are there bdsm 'experts' that are any better than the priest who teaches vanillas how to stay married?
There  isnt a manual that teaches people how to have better relationships.  There might be things that teach us better communication and tools that might *help* in our relationships.  But theres no one set of rules, or any training program that is going to guarantee the success of any relationship.

Yes, there are 'experts' in this lifestyle who are capable of providing such training.  And unlike the priest in said example, these are people actively involved.  There are also manuals and books on the subject.  I can think of two that have been published off the top of my head, a third that deals with the topic, and I have also seen several private manuals which belonged to individuals or groups.

Will it guarantee success... of course not, who said it would?  What it does do is better equip a slave towards that desired success.  That's its function.

quote:

ORIGINAL: sweetnessforsir
I have had a trainer.  We still keep in contact.  I will be meeting his sub soon for coffee.  It was not a romantic relationship, it was a care-taker and teacher relationship.
I have also had a mentor.  It was also a teaching relationship.
I would recommend both to a newcomer, particularly one who had made a recent cross country move.
I am not sure how others are defining "Trainer" and "mentor."  Perhaps it is different.  I see them both as having been guides to getting settled and finding my niche.  While there were difficulties in both relationships, I value both of them a great deal.  The difficulties arise mostly from my growth, which was the goal.
These relationships were not about sex and conquest, but about learning and friendships.  They both had bumps in the path, but both were worth the effort.
I am not sure I understand the disdain for a Trainer or a mentor.

You sound like you had a good mentor and trainer, and present us with a good, real world, example of what it should be.  To answer your question regarding the disdain... its simply because so often those claiming to be mentors and trainers are not what you describe.  Of those online who make such claims I'd guess that perhaps only 1 in 100 were the genuine article.  That's really just a guess to indicate how small I think the percentage is, they are rare.

quote:

ORIGINAL: LuckyAlbatross
I agree, the concept of training in itself is actually a pretty darned good one.  And if novices were keeping their wits about them, seeking actual long term training and discipline, not just a few hot scenes and fucks, and didn't just fall for the guy who got their panties all wet and sounded all wise- I'd be the first one to shove newbies into training.
But that's not how it works.
Somehow this thread went from "Why do clueless newbies plunge themselves into a frenzy of NEEDING training right off when what they want (a personal relationship) they already have the skills for?" into discussing the merits of training in the scene in general.
Not a bad thing, but definitely a swerve from the path.

Training can be a wonderful thing when used for what it was intended, teaching.  But it seems like more and more often, especially online, it becomes a euphamism for those hot scenes, short term relationships, exploring, etc.

When it works as it should, its a good thing.  Sadly, it often isn't used as it should be.
And yes this thread swerved, but it was a predictable one.  Training is one of those hot button issues with a lot of people.  The minute it gets mentioned, regardless of the context, the opinions (often uninformed) comes out of the woodwork against it.  A few will support it and some will sit there dazed wondering what just happened.  Same shit, different day.


Alright, so we want to discuss training and what it should be.  Fine, no problem at all.  I train.  Specifically, I train female slaves to serve primarily male dominants because that's the dynamic I personally have a vested interest in.  However, my training methods can and have been applied by myself and others to training female slaves to serve female dominants, male slaves to serve female dominants and even used with one or two Submissives.  When I train, such training is divided into two main areas, Generalized Training and Specialized Training.  I'll address, and briefly, only Generalized Training here to give an example of what organized training my look like.

Generalized Training is essentially basic training, welcome to slave boot camp.  The purpose is to provide basic orientation, information and skills regarding slavery as a style of life.

Training begins with Orientation.  The purpose of orientation is to give the trainee an introduction into slavery as a style of life, basic concepts, what to expect and generally what will and may be expected of them.  It serves to make clear how this choice  will affect their life.  It closes with the trainee being asked again if they are certain they want this.  They are asked a second time because at this point they are making an informed decision about what they are doing, those who agree are giving informed consent.  For me personally, this is an important ethical point.

Orientation is followed by Development of the Slave Identity.  This is a short series of lessons regarding what a slave is.  While a what a slave is vs a sub may be hotly debated in forums, someone actually seeking to be enslaved can have no such doubt.  What a slave is, what they are becoming, must be clear in their minds... they need a clear defintion.  Following this is a lesson on Positive Self Image.  Slaves may be put into embarassing or humiliating situations, they may be required to do things they were taught are immoral or taboo, they will almost certainly cross such boundaries.  Doing so without becoming an emotional and mental basket case means having a strong positive self image and knowing how to maintain it.  This lesson focuses on that important point.  This is dealt with even further in Good Girls / Boys Do... which specifically deals with the common problem of having been taught "good girls don't" when in order to be a good slave, you must, and learning to reconcile this.  It deals very specifically with avoiding feelings of shame (slaves should literally be shameless, that is feeling no shame for the services they perform).

Obedience training includes trust building exercises, the personal rewards of obedience, and putting it into practice.  Its one thing to know you should obey, but quite another to have the habit.

Communication lessons are broken down in to teaching common forms of speech restrictions, journaling, self expression and communication skills.  Journaling is a useful tool to help a slave explore her feelings in writing as well as helping in reflecting on them later.  It helps the slave look at issues more objectively and can also become a form of communication with their owner, who can be shown the journal (written communication with a dominant is often less intimidating for a submissive than verbal communication).  Self expression teaches the slave important lessons about saying what she thinks and feels.  Often slaves have difficulty saying No, yet there are times they need to be able to do so.  Slaves also frequently have trouble asking for what they want or expressing how they feel, yet this is also an area that they need to be able to communicate effectively.  Communication skills teaches skills at verbal, written and electronic communication, covering basic etiquette, penmanship, etc.  We live in a communication age and this training serves to aid the slave in being more effective and useful in this regard.

Basic Skills covers Protocols and Etiquette, Positions, Serving 101, and Self Care.  Protocols and Etiquette teaches common forms of etiquette and protocols used in the lifestyle, whether that be online, at an event, at a high protocol dinner, etc.  It will not make the slave an expert, but it does teach her enough to avoid embarassing herself or her owner.  Positions teaches some basic and popular positions.  The physical aspect of this is often combined with obedience training and I've observed the physical training is also often a welcome change from the other lessons.  Serving 101 is just that, the basics of being of service.  It focuses more on attitude and how you serve rather than the forms of service themselves.  In other words, it teaches service with a smile.  Last, but certainly not least is Self Care.  A slave is responsible for herself, always, and that includes her own healthy.  These lessons teach basic health care (hygene, diet, first aid), as well as caring for themselves mentally and emotionally (dealing with stress, fear, etc.)

There ends Generalized Training, which in my own experience takes from 3 to 6 months depending on the trainee.  And before anyone asks, no I do not train others any longer, I do not train for others any longer... at this point I train only for my own use.  That's a personal choice on my part.

For those wondering about training, what it is or could be, what purpose it might serve... consider the above food for thought.

Bon Apetite




LadiesBladewing -> RE: Newbies who are looking for trainers... ??? (6/9/2006 4:49:20 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Emperor1956

(5) 
quote:

Quivver:  although I ~tend~ to be service oriented, sex makes the world go round. 
  if you truly believe this, then you are not a service oriented submissive.  Nothing wrong with that, but don't claim that which you are not.  Service oriented submissives love the SERVICE; the sex is fun, but it is incidental. 

E.



Holy Dictionary, Batman -- Someone GETS IT!

I have no idea how many times I've tried to explain this to people, and how few of them actually grasp that service slavery may have sex and it may not. If it doesn't, nobody feels like they're missing out on anything, if it -does-, it's just another form of service.

Da'Avatar ZWD

www.klashaan.org




zumala -> RE: Newbies who are looking for trainers... ??? (6/9/2006 5:33:40 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadiesBladewing


quote:

ORIGINAL: Emperor1956

(5) 
quote:

Quivver:  although I ~tend~ to be service oriented, sex makes the world go round. 
  if you truly believe this, then you are not a service oriented submissive.  Nothing wrong with that, but don't claim that which you are not.  Service oriented submissives love the SERVICE; the sex is fun, but it is incidental. 

E.



Holy Dictionary, Batman -- Someone GETS IT!

I have no idea how many times I've tried to explain this to people, and how few of them actually grasp that service slavery may have sex and it may not. If it doesn't, nobody feels like they're missing out on anything, if it -does-, it's just another form of service.

Da'Avatar ZWD

www.klashaan.org


*smiles*  I guess I always understood the concept, because I wish to serve but have no intention of including sex in the service.
 
zuma




marieToo -> RE: Newbies who are looking for trainers... ??? (6/9/2006 5:36:06 PM)

Padriag:

You mentioned alot about the training of the slaves/subs.  But who trains the doms/masters?    If anyone needs training I think it would be the Doms even moreso.   Would they go to mentors as young doms ?  And if you're new, how would they pick a teacher or trainer that knows what theyre doing?




Padriag -> RE: Newbies who are looking for trainers... ??? (6/9/2006 7:21:47 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: marieToo

Padriag:

You mentioned alot about the training of the slaves/subs.  But who trains the doms/masters?    If anyone needs training I think it would be the Doms even moreso.   Would they go to mentors as young doms ?  And if you're new, how would they pick a teacher or trainer that knows what theyre doing?

Unfortunately, many don't or can't.  There are a number of reasons for this, I'll try to explain.

First, many don't or can't simply because there is a great deal less community support for this than there is the training of submissives.  Take into consideration the amount of opposition you see towards training submissives and then multiply that to get an idea how resistant to the idea of training dominants many are.

That's not to say there is no support for it.  There isn't much in the heterosexual community, but among the Leathermen its was something of a tradition.  How much of a tradition and when it became so is debateable, but at some point the practice seems to have become fairly wide spread.  (And no I'm not an expert on the history of the Leathermen community).  But this at least provides one example.

There are some groups, some of which are pansexual or heterosexual, which also provide training to new dominants.  Most of the ones I have encountered were private groups that did not accept new dominants as members very often, which makes them of limited help to the wider community.

There are some individuals who will provide mentoring but this too is rare, rarer in my opinion than those willing to genuinely mentor a submissive.  I personally think this is in part due to dominant egos.  Many new dominants feel somewhat insecure and quickly develop a bravado as a cover... that same bravado prevents them from openly seeking out training, instruction or other forms of information that would help then.  This is because they often feel, and with justification, that doing so openly would make them seem weak.  The fact that that is justified because, in fact, there are many submissives that would view such a dominant as being weak, or at least incompetent, doesn't help any.

So that leaves many individual dominants on their own to privately seek whatever education or information they can.  Most learn through a long process of trial and error.  Many are handicapped further by simply not knowing what information to look for.  For example, in my own case I came to this lifestyle with a background in psychology (gee, like you couldn't guess [;)]) and drew on that knowledge to guide me in learning to be a better dominant.  I did a LOT of reading and research using resources both within and outside the lifestyle.  I was fortunate in that regard, many are not.

There's one last thing I've seen that contributes to the problem.  Although there is considerably less literature on dominance than there is submission, what does exist has a very limited audience.  Many dominants are so individualistic that even if their ego isn't getting in the way, they still reject the methodology of another over personal differences of style.  Dominants are prone to be, at times, blindly individualistic to the point of handicapping themselves.  The result is that sometimes dominants reject information that could otherwise be helpful for superficial reasons, throwing the baby out with the bath water as it were.  Most also can't agree on anything that might be applied to them as a group.  For example, codes of conduct or ethics.  Even Goreans, who are more prone to "close ranks" often can't agree on exactly what a Gorean code of conduct should be, other than to espouse honor, and respect and integrity as if these words alone were an explanation.  Like most dominants, when you start trying to define that honor or integrity, they are just as prone to fall into arguments over the details.  BTW, this isn't to pick Goreans, just using them as a well known example. 




marieToo -> RE: Newbies who are looking for trainers... ??? (6/9/2006 8:01:46 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Padriag

quote:

ORIGINAL: marieToo

Padriag:

You mentioned alot about the training of the slaves/subs.  But who trains the doms/masters?    If anyone needs training I think it would be the Doms even moreso.   Would they go to mentors as young doms ?  And if you're new, how would they pick a teacher or trainer that knows what theyre doing?

Unfortunately, many don't or can't.  There are a number of reasons for this, I'll try to explain.

First, many don't or can't simply because there is a great deal less community support for this than there is the training of submissives.  Take into consideration the amount of opposition you see towards training submissives and then multiply that to get an idea how resistant to the idea of training dominants many are.

That's not to say there is no support for it.  There isn't much in the heterosexual community, but among the Leathermen its was something of a tradition.  How much of a tradition and when it became so is debateable, but at some point the practice seems to have become fairly wide spread.  (And no I'm not an expert on the history of the Leathermen community).  But this at least provides one example.

There are some groups, some of which are pansexual or heterosexual, which also provide training to new dominants.  Most of the ones I have encountered were private groups that did not accept new dominants as members very often, which makes them of limited help to the wider community.

There are some individuals who will provide mentoring but this too is rare, rarer in my opinion than those willing to genuinely mentor a submissive.  I personally think this is in part due to dominant egos.  Many new dominants feel somewhat insecure and quickly develop a bravado as a cover... that same bravado prevents them from openly seeking out training, instruction or other forms of information that would help then.  This is because they often feel, and with justification, that doing so openly would make them seem weak.  The fact that that is justified because, in fact, there are many submissives that would view such a dominant as being weak, or at least incompetent, doesn't help any.

So that leaves many individual dominants on their own to privately seek whatever education or information they can.  Most learn through a long process of trial and error.  Many are handicapped further by simply not knowing what information to look for.  For example, in my own case I came to this lifestyle with a background in psychology (gee, like you couldn't guess [;)]) and drew on that knowledge to guide me in learning to be a better dominant.  I did a LOT of reading and research using resources both within and outside the lifestyle.  I was fortunate in that regard, many are not.

There's one last thing I've seen that contributes to the problem.  Although there is considerably less literature on dominance than there is submission, what does exist has a very limited audience.  Many dominants are so individualistic that even if their ego isn't getting in the way, they still reject the methodology of another over personal differences of style.  Dominants are prone to be, at times, blindly individualistic to the point of handicapping themselves.  The result is that sometimes dominants reject information that could otherwise be helpful for superficial reasons, throwing the baby out with the bath water as it were.  Most also can't agree on anything that might be applied to them as a group.  For example, codes of conduct or ethics.  Even Goreans, who are more prone to "close ranks" often can't agree on exactly what a Gorean code of conduct should be, other than to espouse honor, and respect and integrity as if these words alone were an explanation.  Like most dominants, when you start trying to define that honor or integrity, they are just as prone to fall into arguments over the details.  BTW, this isn't to pick Goreans, just using them as a well known example. 


Padriag:
 
Thank you for endulging me.  I always appreciate your well thought-out and articulate replys.  A couple of points you brought out are things that had actually crossed my mind as well...ie...typical macho bravado type stuff (sorry guys).  In my experience, I have come across SO many Dominants/Masters who so readily criticize other Masters for the way they do things, handle situations, or train their slaves.  And they seem so close-minded to consider anything but their own way. I dont speak of ALL Masters of course. But I have seen this to a great degree, in real time.  And as you said, one might reject the methodology of another, hence my issue with subs being trained by someone else *for* another Master.  However, I think in groups such as Gorean, and other subcultures that seem to be forming under the blanket of bdsm,  a certain training may come in handy, where they ALL live with the exact same rules of protocol, positions and things of that nature.  
 
I dont discount your points.  I think theyre valid ones, and clearly alot of people do believe in seeking training.  But seriously, I think the Doms have so much more reason to seek out information from older and more experienced dominants who they trust. Im not sure Id call it training, but if I was going to pursue a relationship in which I was dominant, I would seek advice on how to handle disobedience, punishment, throwing a whip, control over emotions and anger, how to temper strictness against care/love etc etc.  I have always felt that Dominants/Masters have the much harder role than the submissives.  I have the greatest respect and admiration for the good ones.  Surely it cant be easy.  (Im getting off on a tangent).
 
The other point that I wanted to make was when newbie submissives come out here looking for trainers, so many of these guys take total advantage of them, and teach them that taking a whipping and getting fucked up the ass is part of their training.  Sorry to be blunt, but unfortunately there will always be this type taking advantage of people.  I guess it comes down to common sense, but sometimes its hard when all the newbies have rose colored glasses on.  Ah well,  I guess the school of hard knocks is the best teacher anyway.
 
marie.




lisa1978 -> RE: Newbies who are looking for trainers... ??? (6/9/2006 8:04:31 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Padriag

So many points to address.  Seems the topic of training always generates a strong reaction in so many.  Sometimes I wonder how much the dynamic of such debates would be changed if the word teaching were substituted for training where it appears. 



I think you are quite correct on that part. Because training has such a different meaning to so many people who live these lives that it comes with such bias from so many angles.

I personally do not like training term because I associate it with a specific way like old guard or Gorean which are not my thing or it is personal between my owner and me with them showing me what they want which is very personal in nature.

Others simply think as training as just that. Harmless training to show what the life is like to new people. My problem with how the term gets used is that it is human nature to make things we do more noble, better or justify within ourselves so we come up with these labels to justify and feel better about ourselves.

In other words for dominants who really like dealing with new people the word and philosophy sounds better than I enjoy fresh meat. For the new submissive the word sounds much better than casual play. Please do not misconstrue what I said as a negative. I  am 100% for if people like introducing new people into the life and new people playing around as a way to see the life and if it is what they want. Good for both.

I just wish this could work in the opposite way. I was not a slut in high school but a sexual explorer. :)

Not to be hypocritical after I just write about everyone having different meanings but, I do not believe you can be a mentor as a dominant actively playing with the submissive you are "mentoring" . I know it might be a difference of opinion on the word mentor, but for me a mentor is someone you can ask anything and get an independent answer. I just do not think you can ask your dominant "was it OK for you to do that?". The independence is just not there.





MdmSarah -> RE: Newbies who are looking for trainers... ??? (6/10/2006 4:22:40 AM)

I really enjoy taking a novice in hand and training them - I find it very rewarding to open someone's eyes to what it is to "live" this. 

But I agree - that novice has to be looking for training, not a string of hot scenes/sex.




LadyElizabeth -> RE: Newbies who are looking for trainers... ??? (6/10/2006 6:06:30 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Proprietrix
Where/why is it that you’ve gotten the impression that you need training?

Because, the learning never ends. I have experience in the lifestyle, but I want to learn more from a Domme with greater experience then I, by serving her.
quote:


What type of training/trainer exactly are you looking for?


Training; I would like to expand my ablities and learn varied and/or new techniques, different styles of conduct while doing a scene, and the correct/safe use of toys/impliments that I have no or limited knowledge of yet.
Trainer; Someone with simular interests to mine, a greater portfolio of experiences then I, and someone who is willing to hold my hand if neccessary, while I learn by serving them.
quote:


 Are you looking for someone who is going to teach you how to date other kinky people?

No, but perhaps show me around other parts of the BDSM scene in my area that I have yet to see or explore.
quote:


Do you not know how to go out and make friends and date?

Yes, but it's not always easy walking into unfamiliar surroundings without support or some guidance for the shy or new.
quote:

 
Have you been informed that there is a "School of BDSM" in which people become certified kink teachers and you have to pass their class before you’re allowed to go out and have an adult relationship?


Yes I have, I heard it's called "Life", but if you do your homework and get to know someone with greater experiences then your own, you can learn more with fewer mistakes. In many peoples eyes, it makes great sence to seek out those that have gone before and ask them for guidance.
quote:


Do you doubt your own ability to pursue and maintain relationships?


Not at all, but then again, that's not always the case when someone seeks a trainer or mentor. 

Being a switch, I have two sides to deal with. I am quite in touch with my submissive side, it's my Domme or Top personality that I would like to expand on. I see no harm in seeking a "Trainer" or "Mentor" with greater experience then I, to aid me in my goal.




Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.078125