RE: Romney still at Bain in 2002

RE: Romney still at Bain in 2002 (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

Owner59 -> RE: Romney still at Bain in 2002 (7/15/2012 11:42:18 AM)
If someone is playing fast and loose with the truth and wants to conceal something......this is how one would do it. Mitt`s looking like another one of those elitists who feels the laws and rules don`t apply to them.

thishereboi -> RE: Romney still at Bain in 2002 (7/15/2012 3:59:12 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Owner59 You`re as shallow as the come...... The come? You might not make so many typos if you take a breath and chill out. You don`t even have a grasp of the issues,much less have something to offer. This from the poster who thinks coming into a post and whining 'all cons are evil" is intelligent conversation? What are you doing here? killing time, talking to people and picking on bigots. Now about that op...Did anyone take a letter down to their local Romney office for moveon?

subrob1967 -> RE: Romney still at Bain in 2002 (7/15/2012 8:04:15 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Owner59 I`ll take Chicago over .......ummm....Indianapolis?......any fuck`n day.[sm=rofl.gif] And end shot in an alley.[;)]

Owner59 -> RE: Romney still at Bain in 2002 (7/15/2012 8:25:24 PM)
Bet they got great bingo and Bridge games in........Indianapolis?[;)]

subrob1967 -> RE: Romney still at Bain in 2002 (7/15/2012 10:56:05 PM)
You Bainers are worse than Birthers

tweakabelle -> RE: Romney still at Bain in 2002 (7/16/2012 12:50:13 AM)
The startling news that Mittens had ”retroactively retired” from Bain Capital, seems to have touched the zeitgeist. I’ve been (currently not retroactively) bombarded with retroactive offers left right and centre. A nice firm of stockbrokers phoned to advise me that they offer retroactive investment advice, apparently so good that they guarantee that every tip will be a winner. Isn’t that sweet of them? A very fashion-conscious acquaintance has offered to fit me out retroactively, guaranteeing that every item will be “next season’s fashion” at today’s discounted prices! Too chic by half I thought! My car insurance company called to say that they were now insuring retroactively and could now offer me a discount ‘no-claims bonus’ for the years 2000-11 if I sent them a cheque. It turns out that their Human Resources Dept has positions vacant for a retroactive President, CEO and sole shareholder too, at a handy $100,000 pa. Apparently all I have to do is sign an occasional document and “play dumb” (whatever that means) if anyone official ever asks. I think I can see a new career path for myself there. Even my mother mentioned she could raise me from infancy retroactively, and I would turn out flawless. Now there's an offer too good to refuse ......! So thank you very much Mr Mittens you have changed my life! I’m so grateful that I am sending you a (retroactive) donation. [:D]

subrob1967 -> RE: Romney still at Bain in 2002 (7/16/2012 2:12:48 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: tweakabelle The startling news that Mittens had ”retroactively retired” from Bain Capital, seems to have touched the zeitgeist. I’ve been (currently not retroactively) bombarded with retroactive offers left right and centre. A nice firm of stockbrokers phoned to advise me that they offer retroactive investment advice, apparently so good that they guarantee that every tip will be a winner. Isn’t that sweet of them? A very fashion-conscious acquaintance has offered to fit me out retroactively, guaranteeing that every item will be “next season’s fashion” at today’s discounted prices! Too chic by half I thought! My car insurance company called to say that they were now insuring retroactively and could now offer me a discount ‘no-claims bonus’ for the years 2000-11 if I sent them a cheque. It turns out that their Human Resources Dept has positions vacant for a retroactive President, CEO and sole shareholder too, at a handy $100,000 pa. Apparently all I have to do is sign an occasional document and “play dumb” (whatever that means) if anyone official ever asks. I think I can see a new career path for myself there. Even my mother mentioned she could raise me from infancy retroactively, and I would turn out flawless. Now there's an offer too good to refuse ......! So thank you very much Mr Mittens you have changed my life! I’m so grateful that I am sending you a (retroactive) donation. [:D] How about you retroactively vote for him in November? He did run in 08 after all.

Moonhead -> RE: Romney still at Bain in 2002 (7/16/2012 4:39:28 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: subrob1967 You Bainers are worse than Birthers How so? It isn't like the Bainers are refusing to accept something that's been proven no matter how many times the facts are repeated. That seems to be more your schtick in this thread than theirs...

Lucylastic -> RE: Romney still at Bain in 2002 (7/16/2012 5:35:14 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Moonhead quote: ORIGINAL: subrob1967 You Bainers are worse than Birthers How so? It isn't like the Bainers are refusing to accept something that's been proven no matter how many times the facts are repeated. That seems to be more your schtick in this thread than theirs... what an imbecilic thing to suggest in the first place

mnottertail -> RE: Romney still at Bain in 2002 (7/16/2012 6:18:34 AM)
This reminds me of the Perot campaign in every respect, and I expect the same outcome.

Lucylastic -> RE: Romney still at Bain in 2002 (7/16/2012 6:28:19 AM)
I missed all that raising my kidlets. will have to read it up

kalikshama -> RE: Romney still at Bain in 2002 (7/16/2012 6:41:10 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DomKen So is anyone buying the "retroactive retirement" claim? http://www.businessinsider.com/ed-gillespie-mitt-romney-bain-capital-retired-retroactively-2012-7 [sm=rofl.gif][sm=rofl.gif][sm=rofl.gif][sm=rofl.gif][sm=rofl.gif]

Owner59 -> RE: Romney still at Bain in 2002 (7/16/2012 7:08:54 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Moonhead quote: ORIGINAL: subrob1967 You Bainers are worse than Birthers How so? It isn't like the Bainers are refusing to accept something that's been proven no matter how many times the facts are repeated. That seems to be more your schtick in this thread than theirs... He`s thinking that the birthers made normal folks as angry and upset as they are now, over having to defend Mitt? Hard to say but fun as hell to watch. Must suck being a con nowadays....

Moonhead -> RE: Romney still at Bain in 2002 (7/16/2012 8:23:19 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Owner59 quote: ORIGINAL: Moonhead quote: ORIGINAL: subrob1967 You Bainers are worse than Birthers How so? It isn't like the Bainers are refusing to accept something that's been proven no matter how many times the facts are repeated. That seems to be more your schtick in this thread than theirs... He`s thinking that the birthers made normal folks as angry and upset as they are now, over having to defend Mitt? Hard to say but fun as hell to watch. Must suck being a con nowadays.... They enjoy sucking. Especially in airport toilets...

farglebargle -> RE: Romney still at Bain in 2002 (7/16/2012 9:46:49 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail This reminds me of the Perot campaign in every respect, and I expect the same outcome. FWIW, Perot was dead right about the "Giant Sucking Sound" from NAFTA.

papassion -> RE: Romney still at Bain in 2002 (7/16/2012 10:14:17 AM)
DEMOCRAT Bill Clinton started the NATIONAL "giant sucking sound" of jobs OUT of the USA by the tens of thousands, by signing NAFTA. Romney (if he was in charge) sent SOME private jobs out of the USA. So REPUBLICAN Romney is the asshole? Is that the way Liberals play it? Also, Libs might want to check which countries would have benefited with jobs If Obama and his advisors actually had the brains to pick a successful "green jobs" company.

mnottertail -> RE: Romney still at Bain in 2002 (7/16/2012 10:16:06 AM)
Oh, all he did was sign it, you might want to remember that Reagan, Bush, Nixon and Carter were either in the Whitehouse at the signing ceremony, or championg the fuck out of it in the media. I think that was a bad deal made by politicians for politicians.

Lucylastic -> RE: Romney still at Bain in 2002 (7/16/2012 10:18:55 AM)
if you had the balls to stick around , you would have seen the argument to your CLINTONS sNAFTA Bullshit.He may have signed it into law, but HW signed it and it was HIS BABY Following diplomatic negotiations dating back to 1986(when REAGAN WAS KING) among the three nations, the leaders met in San Antonio, Texas, on December 17, 1992, to sign NAFTA. U.S. President George H. W. Bush, Canadian Prime Minister Brian Mulroney and Mexican President Carlos Salinas, each responsible for spearheading and promoting the agreement, ceremonially signed it.

Moonhead -> RE: Romney still at Bain in 2002 (7/16/2012 11:02:46 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: papassion DEMOCRAT Bill Clinton started the NATIONAL "giant sucking sound" of jobs OUT of the USA by the tens of thousands, by signing NAFTA. Romney (if he was in charge) sent SOME private jobs out of the USA. So REPUBLICAN Romney is the asshole? Is that the way Liberals play it? Also, Libs might want to check which countries would have benefited with jobs If Obama and his advisors actually had the brains to pick a successful "green jobs" company. No, that were REPUBLICAN George "the Chimp's dad" Bush's idea.

subrob1967 -> RE: Romney still at Bain in 2002 (7/16/2012 11:39:49 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Moonhead How so? It isn't like the Bainers are refusing to accept something that's been proven no matter how many times the facts are repeated. That seems to be more your schtick in this thread than theirs... No, you take Obama's word, and proven fake birth certificate as proof, but won't take Romney's word that he left Bain in 99... Or the word of The Massivetwoshits Commission. Sorry, but from MY point of view, all of you who think this is a bigger issue than it is, and turn a blind eye to the 552,000 jobs that were lost under Obama are as bad, if not worse than the Birthers. You're all a bunch of Bainers.

Page: << < prev 3 4 [5] 6 7 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.0625