LadyPact
Posts: 32566
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: WestBaySlave I've seen it used in all kind of senses. I seems more common in the gay community than the straight one. I've seen all the following apply with self-identified boys: 1. Essentially a non-TPE male submissive of any sort, contrasting "boy" with "slave". This is mostly about the level of control handed over. I've seen this one the most. 2. A man submissive to someone older than himself, possibly involving age-play. 3. A submissive man leaning towards a more affectionate, less formal, less protocol heavy D/s or M/s dynamic, whether TPE or not. The men I've seen who use it usually contrast this with "slave" in terms of the warmth or love involved in the relationship, rather than the amount of control handed over. If in doubt, just ask the person using it! I'm kind of wondering because of number three there. I see the term leather boy used frequently and those are more TPE/Protocol heavy dynamics. I wouldn't want to say whether I see it in the gay leather or het leather community. Just neat that you have seen it the other way around.
_____________________________
The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie. Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread
|