|
Fightdirecto -> Right-wing extremists trying to use Aurora shootings for their own purposes (7/26/2012 6:07:02 AM)
|
Aurora Was An Inside Job
quote:
Here's the first right-wing conspiracy theory about the shootings that killed 12 people and injured dozens more at a midnight screening of the latest Batman movie in Aurora, Colorado, over the weekend.
All indications from the Aurora Police Department are that Batman gunman James Holmes acted alone, for reasons that have yet to be established. But LARRY PRATT - THE PRESIDENT OF GUN OWNERS OF AMERICA, a far-right Second Amendment group that's backed by prominent people like Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) - has a different theory. Pratt believes the timing of Holmes' rampage, which left 12 people dead and 58 wounded, seemed designed to coincide with the upcoming negotiation of the United Nations Small Arms Treaty. A press release sent out to radio bookers on Tuesday advertising Pratt's availability noted that, "In an article posted at The New American…one expert even outlined a theory that Holmes didn't act alone, but was possibly 'enlisted' to carry out his violent act." Pratt, the publicist stated, was free for interviews on Holmes' "impeccable" timing.
The email sources the claim to a blog post by a writer for the New American, the official publication of the John Birch Society - which, in turn, directs readers further down the rabbit hole to a website called Natural News, which breaks it down for you {False Flag Survival}:
quote:
For starters, the Batman movie theater shooting was obviously staged…The evidence of this includes eyewitness reports of MULTIPLE SHOOTERS, James Holmes being drugged out of his mind in court (a common tactic used against patsies), his work as a graduate student in a government-funded neuroscience program that specifically researched altered perception of time and reality, and Holmes having somehow obtained the skill set to build a highly complex maze of makeshift grenades, binary liquid explosives, intricate flammable devices, trip wires and booby traps. THE ATTACK IN AURORA, COLORADO WAS NOT A RUN-OF-THE-MILL RANDOM VIOLENT ACT BY A GRADUATE STUDENT; IT WAS A CAREFULLY PLANNED, PLOTTED, FUNDED, AND WELL-TRAINED ATTACK CARRIED OUT FOR A SPECIFIC PURPOSE…
The real history of the world -- not the fairy tale history you were taught in government-run schools -- is a history of GOVERNMENT GROUPS AND LEADERS STAGING EVENTS TO BLAME THEM ON THEIR ENEMIES. The "false flag" tactic is so remarkably effective that it has been used since the time of the Romans and continues to this day…
If Obama were high in the polls right now, with no risk of losing his re-election bid in November, the risk of a large-scale false flag attack in the months ahead would be minimal. It is the risk of him losing the election that creates the high risk of a false flag operation. Curiously, Obama himself may have absolutely no knowledge of any of this.
Most likely, the kind of dirty work that results in false flag attacks is carried out by "handlers" and unelected power brokers who control much of what transpires on the world stage. As long as these power brokers see Obama's second term as a positive thing for shoring up their global control, they will pull out all the stops to make sure he gets reelected, including (but not limited to) staging a false flag event that Obama himself may not even be aware of until the last minute. It's easier for his reaction to the tragedy to appear sufficiently authentic, after all, if he's actually not in the loop…
You can expect the next false flag to be:
• Very large, killing not just a dozen people but thousands.
• Very bloody, for the purpose of showing such images on the news.
• Timed to support the election of whichever President the global controllers want in office.
Let's analyze this briefly:
If an attack happens before the November election, it would support Obama and help him get reelected. If Romney wins, on the other hand, and an attack happens after the election but before the inauguration, it would support Obama declaring Martial Law and seizing control of the country under emergency powers. If Romney wins and an attack happens after the inauguration in January, it would support Romney's and make him appear heroic much like Bush in 2001. This would soon be followed by a Romney-led push for more restrictions on whatever freedoms or liberties could be conceivably tied to the attack by the mainstream (lying) media.
And some criticize gun control advocates for "using" the Aurora shootings to further their agenda.
Pot calling the kettle black?
|
|
|
|
