When do you have a "right" to take the law into your own hands? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Fightdirecto -> When do you have a "right" to take the law into your own hands? (7/28/2012 3:15:41 PM)

I had posted a thread regarding the deaths of two American citizens, Jesus Flores and his daughter, 9-year-old Brisena Flores and the attempted murder of the girl's mother, American citizen Gina Gonzalez, at the hands of Minuteman vigilantes. The Minuteman vigilantes believed that the three were illegal aliens and that Jesus Flores was a major drug dealer, which somehow justified the attack in their minds. Believing that the three American citizens were actually illegal aliens and that proper law enforcement officers hadn't done their job and arrested them, they believed they had the "right", as American citizens, to "take the law into their own hands" and to rob and kill them. Unfortunatly, I had included a photograph of the young girl, forgetting that we are not supposed to post photographs of minors.

My main concern here is not racism (though I am sure it was a factor in the killing of the Flores family. Sfter sll, 3rd and 4th generation American citizens can’t really be Americans in the eyes of some Whites if those 3rd and 4th generation American citizens are Hispanic).

What troubles me more is the belief, among Minutemen and others, that if you are a good American citizen, you have a “right”, some might say an “obligation”, to take the law into your own hands if you believe someone else is breaking an existing law and proper law enforcement authorities haven't arrested them (like being an illegal immigrant, or reckless driving or playing their stereo too loud), or if they are doing something which should be against the law but isn’t (like being black and wearing a hoodie and walking down the sidewalk of an all-white neighborhood). And you have the “right”, and “obligation”, as an American citizen to use deadly force to do so.

Two recent examples (which do not have a racial component):

Legislator pulled gun during road incident

quote:

A Spokane Valley legislator pulled a gun during a confrontation with another motorist last November in what police reports describe as a road rage incident. He was cited for two violations of state firearms law.

Republican Matt Shea, a state representative seeking a third term this fall, had a handgun in his pickup truck and had let his concealed weapons permit expire, a violation of state law, when he was contacted by Spokane police investigating reports of erratic driving and one driver threatening another with a handgun.

Leroy Norris, the driver of the Lumina, called police to report he had been driving on Monroe when a pickup truck cut him off and he had to slam on the brakes to avoid a collision. He honked his horn, made some “aggressive lane changes” with the pickup, and the driver of that vehicle “flipped him off.” THE DRIVER OF THE PICKUP PULLED A HANDGUN FROM THE PASSENGER SIDE OF THE CAR AND POINTED IT AT HIM, he said. He “freaked out” and drove away “crazy” because he thought his life was in danger, he added.

Norris called the police at Monroe and Fourth Avenue and said he lost the pickup at about 14th Avenue.


Loud Music May Have Led To Slayings

quote:

A loud stereo may have led to death near Mill Creek [Washington] a month ago when a neighbor allegedly shot two people in the head in a dispute that apparently was sparked by loud music.

Martin Rasim Bulichi, 43, was charged yesterday with two counts of first-degree murder in the deaths of Robyn Glover and Brian Beebe. Police have a $1 million arrest warrant for Bulichi, who hasn't been seen since the two were shot Aug. 3.

Beebe and his roommate, Robert McClure, had just moved into the neighborhood in the 16400 block of First Avenue Southeast, just west of Mill Creek. McClure told police BULICHI HAD COME OVER TO THEIR HOUSE A FEW DAYS AFTER THEY MOVED IN TO COMPLAIN ABOUT LOUD MUSIC COMING FROM A POWERFUL STEREO SYSTEM THEY SET UP IN THE GARAGE.

McClure last saw Beebe and Glover, a friend from Seattle, the morning of their deaths, said Deputy Prosecutor Ron Doersch in court papers. When he returned home that afternoon, he found their bodies in the garage. Glover had been shot in the head, and Beebe in the face, back and head.

Bulichi's wife told investigators she saw her husband running down the driveway of their new neighbors' house the afternoon of the killings. Minutes later, he telephoned her and said: "There's been a shooting. I think they got hurt. I think they're going to die," Doersch said.

Another neighbor told police BULICHI ALSO HAD CONFRONTED HIM ABOUT LOUD MUSIC MONTHS BEFORE THE DEATHS.


The moment you take the law into your own hands, you cease being a "Good American Citizen" - you become a criminal.



[image]local://upfiles/42188/138DDEBEB03746718000B3270B727073.jpg[/image]




kdsub -> RE: When do you have a "right" to take the law into your own hands? (7/28/2012 3:31:11 PM)

This mindset is not exclusive to America. Anywhere in the world you will find fanatical people who think they have this right.

Butch




calamitysandra -> RE: When do you have a "right" to take the law into your own hands? (7/28/2012 3:43:44 PM)

You are right, Butch, this behaviour is not restricted to the US. I do feel however, that it is more prevalent there.
Might be an offshott of the whole militia thing being enshrined in the constitution.




Musicmystery -> RE: When do you have a "right" to take the law into your own hands? (7/28/2012 4:27:25 PM)

The "well-regulated" part is well-enshrined too, just pissed on.




DarkSteven -> RE: When do you have a "right" to take the law into your own hands? (7/28/2012 4:48:58 PM)

It's pretty evident here. We have a law in Colorado that holds harmless a homeowner who has reason to believe that he or she is in danger, if they kill an intruder in self defense. I wonder if it will be extended to carjackings.

I agree with the philosophy that a person has the right to take the law into his or her hands if the police will not be able to arrive in time, and if his or her life, health, or property (as in house or car) is endangered by another party.




FullCircle -> RE: When do you have a "right" to take the law into your own hands? (7/28/2012 5:24:49 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DarkSteven
I agree with the philosophy that a person has the right to take the law into his or her hands if the police will not be able to arrive in time, and if his or her life, health, or property (as in house or car) is endangered by another party.

The police aren't going to get there quicker than you being there at the scene instantly, so therefore what time limit are you putting on needing to act? If your life or the lives of your family are in danger then obviously you all flee if possible and defend yourself if not. Personally if my property is in danger then I know it's insured, not going to risk my life over it (I don't know what this other person is capable of or what their background is). If you act against someone without any knowledge of the individual then you're gambling with your life. Even when the police do it they're not stupid enough to face it alone (in most cases).




erieangel -> RE: When do you have a "right" to take the law into your own hands? (7/28/2012 6:14:23 PM)

I agree, FullCircle. There is little that I own that I'd not be able to replace or couldn't live without if I couldn't replace it. What is important is to escape confrontation that could be deadly, not add to it. I could care less if somebody walked off with my TV, computers, jewelry and other belonging. So long as my family and I are safe and unharmed, its all good. Insurance and hard work will take care of those items that had been stolen.




Real0ne -> RE: When do you have a "right" to take the law into your own hands? (7/28/2012 6:32:40 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

The "well-regulated" part is well-enshrined too, just pissed on.




geezus fuck already, what part if "infinged" dont you understand?


and the "well-regulated" ONLY APPLIES to when they are called into service by the gubafia. OTHERWISE they are not a civilian militia but a standing army like the fucking police.

Try con law 000000000001




Real0ne -> RE: When do you have a "right" to take the law into your own hands? (7/28/2012 6:36:11 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DarkSteven

It's pretty evident here. We have a law in Colorado that holds harmless a homeowner who has reason to believe that he or she is in danger, if they kill an intruder in self defense. I wonder if it will be extended to carjackings.

I agree with the philosophy that a person has the right to take the law into his or her hands if the police will not be able to arrive in time, and if his or her life, health, or property (as in house or car) is endangered by another party.



we have that law in wisconsin too.

yeh, only retards would think you do not take the law into your own hands every day you are alive.

these gun posts are getting more fucking retarded every round




Fightdirecto -> RE: When do you have a "right" to take the law into your own hands? (7/28/2012 7:11:01 PM)

One could reasonably argue about the "right" to use your gun to defend your home or your life if attacked - but do you have the "right" to use your gun against someone who you saw not stopping their car for a red light or stop sign? After all, if there are no police there, the driver might escape punishment for violating driving laws. Shouldn't you take the law into your own hands and shoot him?

What about that Hispanic family who just moved in down the block? They sure look like illegal aliens to you, and the police haven't arrested them. Don't you have the "right" to take your gun, break into their house and make a citizen's arrest? And if they resist, don't you have the "right" to shoot to kill in your self-defense?




Fellow -> RE: When do you have a "right" to take the law into your own hands? (7/28/2012 7:18:27 PM)

I do not know the details about the Minutemen murder, but based on what you say, they did not take law into their own hands. There is no law allowing killing for a civil offense like immigration violation. I personally admire Minutemen: responsible true patriots. This isolated incident can happen when we have armed enforcement of something, and it in now way indicates all Minutemen are bad. The police kills perhaps hundreds per year totally unjustified. Would you ban police from the streets, or disarm them?
Regarding using deadly force, I think, every person has the right for such action when their own life is in immediate danger. This is perhaps the only case I wold approve.




Musicmystery -> RE: When do you have a "right" to take the law into your own hands? (7/28/2012 7:49:40 PM)

quote:

what part if "infinged" dont you understand?


No part. There's no such word.




mtcouple -> RE: When do you have a "right" to take the law into your own hands? (7/28/2012 8:39:20 PM)

If your life, or another person's life is in danger, then using lethal force is completely justified. I don't really agree with castle doctrine that you can just kill someone in your home. However, if someone does break into my home, I would be holding my shotgun on them and making them wait for the cops. If, during that wait, they make any suspicious moves, I'd assume they are going for a weapon. I'm not going to shoot someone that isn't a threat, but at the same time, I'm not going to let them walk away.


I'd say that this line of thinking would hold true as well if you were witness to any violent crime.

However, that's a long way from "I saw a drug deal going down, so I shot both of them" or something along those lines.




kalikshama -> RE: When do you have a "right" to take the law into your own hands? (7/29/2012 5:13:22 AM)

quote:

I do not know the details about the Minutemen murder, but based on what you say, they did not take law into their own hands. There is no law allowing killing for a civil offense like immigration violation. I personally admire Minutemen.


Read this and tell me if you still admire Minutemen: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murders_of_Raul_and_Brisenia_Flores




Fightdirecto -> RE: When do you have a "right" to take the law into your own hands? (7/29/2012 7:11:42 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Fellow
I personally admire Minutemen: responsible true patriots. This isolated incident can happen when we have armed enforcement of something, and it in no way indicates all Minutemen are bad.

True - not all people who are anti-illegal immigrants are "bad" - just those who are not legitimate law enforcement officers who take their private guns and attempt to enforce the country's immigration laws (or what they believe the country's immigration laws are or should be).

For example, there were members of a "Minuteman" group who about a year ago proudly put up on the Internet video of themselves shooting at a group of people walking through a small canyon near the Arizona-Mexico border. Since they had heard one or more of those people speaking Spanish, they concluded that the people were illegal immigrants, so they opened fire from ambush. But what if (and we may never know) one or more or all of those people they ambushed had been Spanish-speaking American citizens? The Minutemen made no effort to determine if the people were legal or illegal as legitimate law enforcement officers would or should - they just started shooting. That makes the Minutemen criminals - not "responsible true patriots".

Minutemen leaders have been arrested and convicted of kidnapping and unlawful detention of American citizens whose only "crime" was that they were Hispanic and spoke Spanish in preference to English. Is kidnapping and unlawful detention of American citizens the act of a "responsible true patriot"?

But, stepping away from the Minutemen for a moment, do you have a "right" or an "obligation" to use your gun against anyone you believe is breaking a law?

Do you have a "right" or an "obligation" to use your gun against anyone who cuts you off on the highway or takes the parking space you were planning on using?

If you know that your next door neighbor is away on vacation, do you have a "right" or an "obligation" to use your gun against anyone who walks up to your next door neighbor's front door? After all, they might be a potential burglar getting ready to break in and even if you called the police, the police might not respond in time to prevent the break-in. Of course, they could also be a pizza delivery man who had gotten the wrong address – but better safe than sorry, right?

IMO, the only instance where a person can legitimately “take the law into their own hands” is when they are personally under the threat of bodily harm from another person.




Owner59 -> RE: When do you have a "right" to take the law into your own hands? (7/29/2012 7:26:41 AM)

An interesting post on the news site:

"Cue the Shea conspiracy theory squad! Who’s responsible for this one? Liberals made him do it? A set-up because of his support for messianic judaism? There must be some explanation that doesn’t involve him taking actual personal responsibility for his actions!

Shea already started the theory: he claimed that the guy cut him off “because of his work?” What?!? Gives a whole new perspective to the whole sign vandalism conspiracy theory.

And this behavior gives a new perspective to his ex-wife’s claims.

I want the Spokesman to figure out how Plaxico Burress got several years in prison for having an unlicensed gun, when he didn’t even pull it out and only hurt himself, whereas this guy actually pulls an unlicensed gun on someone, on top of the other crap he did, and gets off pretty much scot free. Of course HIS lawyer says it’s normal, but I call B.S."




Real0ne -> RE: When do you have a "right" to take the law into your own hands? (7/29/2012 4:16:39 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

The "well-regulated" part is well-enshrined too, just pissed on.



you cant even tell us what that mean and how it is properly applied.

Its perfectly clear its the ONLY thing that is enshrined in YOUR MIND. The rest of us read it for what it is. (and is not)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

quote:

what part if "infinged" dont you understand?


No part. There's no such word.



ehwn all else fails and you cant make the cut you can always grow up to be spelling nazi!




Musicmystery -> RE: When do you have a "right" to take the law into your own hands? (7/29/2012 7:32:00 PM)

I do make a lot of money writing, yes.




Page: [1]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
5.078125E-02