feastie -> RE: Punishment or Pleasure (6/11/2006 1:25:35 PM)
|
Punishments are a reactive event, based in anger at the transgression and the transgressor. They are the hallmarks of a person who is incapable of dealing with a negative event in any other way. If you, as a dominant, make a mistake at your job, are you beaten? No, you're called into your supervisor's office and you come out with a little less ass than when you entered. The goals of a dominant are not to break the will of his submissive, to have her cower and fear for making him angry. The goals of a dominant are (or should be) to inspire his will to be done. To change perceptions that may be incongruous with his own. A submissive's guilt at the displeasure of her dominant is overwhelming to her. Most never want to be displeasing, but everyone does make mistakes. A lesson can be taught incorporating this guilt and have much better results than any corporal punishment ever could. There are those who do things specifically to incite her dominant to anger, and therefore, to a beating. This is because she wants the beating and has been taught by him or others before him, that spanking is a tool that is used for pleasure, but also for "punishment." She will eventually learn that she can control her spankings by doing things to make her dominant angry. Most people don't often think well when angry. Many will say, " Oh, she KNOWS the difference between a pleasure spanking and a punishment one." If the difference is that large, then it becomes abuse, whether agreed to or not. Your mind is far more powerful than your backswing.
|
|
|
|