tazzygirl -> RE: everybody : New Lows For The Obama Campaign (8/16/2012 5:10:41 PM)
|
quote:
Lies, damn lies and statistics. Much of commercial mortgages are not bought / sold, which is why I said mortgages purchased. Put aside the quibble about the % of the market - the point still remains had Fannie and freddie NOT relaxed their standards their is no issue. Source? quote:
Second point: the banks relaxed their standards because they were REQUIRED to; and subjected to harassment to make them comply - first by private agreements, second by statute. So if you want to return to root causes - (which you ignored) you have to blame congress. And were not banks and mortgage companies fined for hiding things from customers who should never have been approved? On Sep. 7, 2008, the government took over Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Under the terms of the rescue, the Treasury has invested billions to cover the companies' losses. The Fannie and Freddie bailout is separate from the broader $700 billion bailout -- known as the TARP -- and instead comes via the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008, passed in July 2008. In February 2009, Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner said as much as $200 billion in taxpayer money might be put into each company. In December of 2009, the Treasury removed that cap, meaning an unlimited amount of money could be invested. http://projects.propublica.org/bailout/entities/158-fannie-mae Freddie Mac Disbursed $71,336,000,000 Returned $0 (Of course none is returned... ahem... the government owns it now) Revenue to Gov't $18,328,000,000 Net Outstanding $53,008,000,000 Fannie Mae Disbursed $116,149,000,000 Returned $0 Revenue to Gov't $22,603,000,000 Net Outstanding $93,546,000,000 (Same source) Now, honestly, who was the party in charge at this time?
|
|
|
|