Rep.King Says He’s Never Heard Of UMs Getting Pregnant Through Rape (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Owner59 -> Rep.King Says He’s Never Heard Of UMs Getting Pregnant Through Rape (8/21/2012 7:37:53 PM)

More extremism for our con-dummies.......

http://www.addictinginfo.org/2012/08/21/rep-steve-king-says-hes-never-heard-of-children-getting-pregnant-through-rape-video/


Is this ugliness purposeful ?




SlipSlidingAway -> RE: Rep.King Says He’s Never Heard Of UMs Getting Pregnant Through Rape (8/21/2012 7:45:21 PM)

How about this one?  From Kansas Rep Pete DeGraaf?  Comparing rape to a flat tire?

http://www.motherjones.com/mixed-media/2011/05/venn-diagram-rape-vs-flat-tire




DaNewAgeViking -> RE: Rep.King Says He’s Never Heard Of UMs Getting Pregnant Through Rape (8/21/2012 9:01:16 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

Is this ugliness purposeful ?

Yes. Each of them is trying to prove he is purer and holier than all the rest, which doesn't have to do with the elections so much as with establishing their place in the Con-iverse. You'd think they would realize this fanaticism will hurt them, but in fact the 'undecided' don't matter to their mindset. Either you're one of them, and prove it constantly by being endlessly in-your-face righteous - or you aren't. Those who aren't will presumably be dealt with when the 'Rapture' comes in November. In that regard, 'November' will always be coming in their world view.
[sm=bowdown.gif]




kalikshama -> RE: Rep.King Says He’s Never Heard Of UMs Getting Pregnant Through Rape (8/22/2012 5:51:02 AM)

Flowchart: "Can I Get Pregnant?"

Learn the biology of your body, according to conservative male lawmakers.

Remember the birds and the bees? The miracle of birth? Forget everything you knew. Turns out there's a lot more to birthin' babies than you might have learned in your godless socialist public-school health class. From this weekend's assertion by Rep. Todd Akin (R-Mo.) that women can't conceive babies during a "legitimate rape" to Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa) saying Monday that he didn't know of any pregnancies caused by incest or statutory rape, conservative male lawmakers targeting reproductive rights have always held, shall we say, minority views on the biology of all things uterine.

Did you know about women's natural stress-induced spermicides? Have you ever seen "God's little protective shield" in a vagina? That's because they don't exist—but these legislators don't know that.

Interactive flowchart: http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/08/flowchart-can-i-get-pregnant

If you're of the double-X persuasion, all of this might leave you a bit flummoxed as to whether you'll conceive. Well, don't worry your pretty little head about it: We've collected the basics of reproductive biology according to conservative politicians, in a handy flowchart format. Need to determine your uterus' destiny? Just ask these men!




DarkSteven -> RE: Rep.King Says He’s Never Heard Of UMs Getting Pregnant Through Rape (8/23/2012 5:24:23 AM)

I'll be darned. Magical changes must take place on a woman's eighteenth birthday. Where do these idiots come from and - more to the point - who votes for them?




subspaceseven -> RE: Rep.King Says He’s Never Heard Of UMs Getting Pregnant Through Rape (8/23/2012 5:37:08 AM)

A lot of people on these boards vote for them........I guess if they cut education enough, the whole country will think like they want us to...




Lucylastic -> RE: Rep.King Says He’s Never Heard Of UMs Getting Pregnant Through Rape (8/23/2012 6:02:26 AM)

I found this one last night, which I thought was hysterical... but its supposed to be serious (I think)
You want off-the-charts status? Check out the curriculum vitae of one Willard M. Romney: $200 million in the bank (and a hell of a lot more if he didn’t give so much away), apex alpha executive, CEO, chairman of the board, governor, bishop, boss of everything he’s ever touched. Son of the same, father of more. It is a curious scientific fact (explained in evolutionary biology by the Trivers-Willard hypothesis — Willard, notice) that high-status animals tend to have more male offspring than female offspring, which holds true across many species, from red deer to mink to Homo sap. The offspring of rich families are statistically biased in favor of sons — the children of the general population are 51 percent male and 49 percent female, but the children of the Forbes billionaire list are 60 percent male. Have a gander at that Romney family picture: five sons, zero daughters. Romney has 18 grandchildren, and they exceed a 2:1 ratio of grandsons to granddaughters (13:5). When they go to church at their summer-vacation home, the Romney clan makes up a third of the congregation. He is basically a tribal chieftain.

Professor Obama? Two daughters. May as well give the guy a cardigan. And fallopian tubes.
From an evolutionary point of view, Mitt Romney should get 100 percent of the female vote. All of it. He should get Michelle Obama’s vote. You can insert your own Mormon polygamy joke here, but the ladies do tend to flock to successful executives and entrepreneurs. Saleh al-Rajhi, billionaire banker, left behind 61 children when he cashed out last year. We don’t do harems here, of course, but Romney is exactly the kind of guy who in another time and place would have the option of maintaining one. He’s a boss. Given that we are no longer roaming the veldt for the most part, money is a reasonable stand-in for social status. Romney’s net worth is more than that of the last eight U.S. presidents combined
https://www.nationalreview.com/nrd/articles/313504/boss
But specifically I love what Linkens did with the article in a response at huff n poo
"
I'm sort of gratified that someone has finally had the courage to argue for Mitt Romney's election based on theories culled from "Doctor Strangelove" -- specifically Base Commander Jack D. Ripper's contention that "precious bodily fluids" are the be-all and end-all signifier of American Exceptionalism. Stepping up to offer this contention is the National Review's Kevin D. Williamson, and I'll straight up admit that I'm envious that there is a guy out there who can write such an argument for a living. Kudos, sirrah!

So, the basic gist of his piece is that Mitt Romney has got mad-potent baby batter brewin' in his loins, and if you ladies knew what was good for you, you'd step to the fore to receive his communion, because -- after all -- "the conventional biological wisdom is that men select mates for fertility, while women select for status."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/22/mitt-romney-female-vote-national-review_n_1822470.html





erieangel -> RE: Rep.King Says He’s Never Heard Of UMs Getting Pregnant Through Rape (8/23/2012 9:35:37 AM)

"I think it’s immoral for us to compel conscientious objecting taxpayers to fund abortion through the federal government..." Rep. King.

I find it immoral that conscientious objecting taxpayers are compelled to fund wars of choice--read Iraq. But I can do little about that as a citizen except vote my displeasure.

I find King and those like him to be idiots.

Ok, I'm off to work. Had a few moments after checking email and thought I'd check out what was happening here.





Page: [1]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125