AAkasha -> RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? (7/26/2013 6:43:23 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: garyFLR It doesn't take a genius to differentiate between 'legitimate' financial domination where there is a genuine relationship between Domme & sub, & the people who advertise themselves as such, in the hope of making a few quid. Akasha's rejection theory makes a good deal of sense. The guys who have a kink for rejection have their needs catered for, for nothing, while the 'finDommes' are screaming FAKE from the highest rooftop. It's a case of the kink provider seriously misjudging their client base. And if makes the angry subs feel any better, really, the 'fake findoms" are completely wasting their time and the subs getting off on rejection are getting exactly what they want for free - every single time. This is 100% a legitimate fetish. These men love, love, love unobtainable women, especially younger princess types who receive money and gifts from men who are richer and better looking (and have bigger cocks) then them. Just like cuckolding. And I can guarantee you that instead of ignoring the subs who email them and engage them, the money findoms respond EVERY SINGLE TIME and the sub strings them along, masturbating, until the sweet, sweet insulting rejection letter finally comes, and he HOPES it includes a big fat juicy insult about how he can't afford her. BINGO! And all for FREE! Then he moves on to the next findom. Meanwhile, Collarme racks in the pageviews. Everyone is happy except the findom, and the subs that come here complaining about the findoms. Akasha
|
|
|
|