Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

Voting rulings


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> Voting rulings Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Voting rulings - 8/29/2012 4:05:46 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
While the focus is on the conventions....

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A U.S. federal court ruled on Tuesday that controversial Texas redistricting maps discriminate against black and Hispanic voters, effectively killing the new districts before they could take effect for the November 6 presidential election.

The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia issued the ruling. The state maps, passed by the Republican-dominated Texas legislature, redrew districts in a way that reduced the influence of minority voters, the court ruled.



November's election will likely use interim maps drawn by a federal court in San Antonio instead.

The Obama administration in 2011 blocked the maps, arguing they violated the 1965 Voting Rights Act, a law designed to protect the voting rights of minorities, primarily blacks in Southern states.

In rejecting the maps, the court could have stopped at ruling that they had a discriminatory effect, but it took the further step of ruling that the Texas legislature had a discriminatory intent in its drawing of the maps.

Under the Voting Rights Act, Texas had the burden to prove that its maps did not discriminate, nor that they intended to.

Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott said in a statement that he would appeal the decision to the U.S. Supreme Court. He called the ruling an extension of the Voting Rights Act beyond what Congress had intended.

The three-judge panel consisted of Judge Thomas Griffith and Judge Rosemary M. Collyer, who were both appointed by President George W. Bush — formerly the governor of Texas - and Judge Beryl A. Howell, appointed by President Barack Obama.


http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2012-08-28/news/sns-rt-us-usa-texas-voter-idbre87r140-20120828_1_interim-maps-texas-legislature-voter-identification-law

and...

A federal judge on Wednesday said he was prepared to grant a permanent injunction that would block controversial restrictions on voter registration groups passed by Florida Gov. Rick Scott (R) last year.

Federal Judge Robert L. Hinkle had earlier put a temporary hold on the measure, declaring that it put "harsh and impractical" restrictions on civic groups focused on registering new voters. In his latest order, Hinkle stated that he intends to permanently block the law, pending the case's dismissal from a Court of Appeals. The plaintiffs and the state of Florida have reportedly agreed not to appeal Hinkle's ruling.


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/29/florida-voter-registration-groups_n_1840146.html

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: Voting rulings - 8/29/2012 5:13:36 PM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
I have not looked at the maps or any ethnic density studies, so I can't say the court was right or wrong, but, I will come out and say that if the court saw discrimination, it made the correct ruling. And, I'm also going to go on record as accepting the court's view by default in this one.

_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: Voting rulings - 8/29/2012 5:17:58 PM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline
quote:

A federal judge on Wednesday said he was prepared to grant a permanent injunction that would block controversial restrictions on voter registration groups passed by Florida Gov. Rick Scott (R) last year.

Federal Judge Robert L. Hinkle had earlier put a temporary hold on the measure, declaring that it put "harsh and impractical" restrictions on civic groups focused on registering new voters. In his latest order, Hinkle stated that he intends to permanently block the law, pending the case's dismissal from a Court of Appeals. The plaintiffs and the state of Florida have reportedly agreed not to appeal Hinkle's ruling.


Oh, that's great news! Thanks for passing it along.

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: Voting rulings - 8/29/2012 5:50:58 PM   
kalikshama


Posts: 14805
Joined: 8/8/2010
Status: offline
Yay! Thanks for the update.

_____________________________

Curious about the "Sluts Vote" avatars? See http://www.collarchat.com/m_4133036/mpage_1/key_/tm.htm#4133036

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: Voting rulings - 8/29/2012 6:03:14 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
That the Texas map got thrown out is no surprise it was drawn to expressly produce minority super majority districts which would have produced fewer minority reps than would fairly drawn maps.

What is quite pleasing is the court issuing a permanent injuction against the Florida voter registration restrictions. That leaves plenty of time for groups across the partisan spectrum to organize voter registration drives.

(in reply to kalikshama)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: Voting rulings - 8/29/2012 6:09:23 PM   
dcnovice


Posts: 37282
Joined: 8/2/2006
Status: offline
FR

I have long thought that redistricting should be done by nonpartisan geographers--imported from abroad if necessary--rather than left to legislators, of either party, with agendas of their own.

Bonus visual--the original Gerrymandered district:



Caption from Wikipedia: First printed in March 1812, this political cartoon was drawn in reaction to the state senate electoral districts drawn by the Massachusetts legislature to favour the Democratic-Republican Party candidates of Governor Elbridge Gerry over the Federalists. The caricature satirises the bizarre shape of a district in Essex County, Massachusetts as a vulture. Federalist newspapers editors and others at the time likened the district shape to a salamander, and the word gerrymander was a blend of that word and Governor Gerry's last name.

_____________________________

No matter how cynical you become,
it's never enough to keep up.

JANE WAGNER, THE SEARCH FOR SIGNS OF
INTELLIGENT LIFE IN THE UNIVERSE

(in reply to kalikshama)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: Voting rulings - 8/29/2012 6:56:52 PM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
You can drive all the way across northern NYS in a straight line and cross five Congressional districts, three of them the 23rd.

(in reply to dcnovice)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: Voting rulings - 8/30/2012 10:21:20 AM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
A bad week for voter suppression in texas
http://www.kxan.com/dpp/news/politics/federal-court-rejects-voter-id-law

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: Voting rulings - 8/30/2012 12:07:04 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
same panel hears the vid in SC next week.  Only thirty more to go after that.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: Voting rulings - 8/30/2012 12:11:31 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
The Judge in PA refused to block, so its heading to state supreme. Another group, the Asian Americans. also filed a brief saying they are especially targeted.

http://articles.philly.com/2012-08-29/news/33477448_1_voter-id-law-penndot-id-voter-rolls

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: Voting rulings - 9/7/2012 9:19:34 AM   
kalikshama


Posts: 14805
Joined: 8/8/2010
Status: offline
Fla. Republican: We wanted to suppress black votes

Florida's disgraced former GOP chairman says the party had meetings about "keeping blacks from voting"

In the debate over new laws meant to curb voter fraud in places like Florida, Democrats always charge that Republicans are trying to suppress the vote of liberal voting blocs like blacks and young people, while Republicans just laugh at such ludicrous and offensive accusations. That is, every Republican except for Florida’s former Republican Party chairman Jim Greer, who, scorned by his party and in deep legal trouble, blew the lid off what he claims was a systemic effort to suppress the black vote. In a 630-page deposition recorded over two days in late May, Greer, who is on trial for corruption charges, unloaded a litany of charges against the “whack-a-do, right-wing crazies” in his party, including the effort to suppress the black vote.

In the deposition, released to the press yesterday, Greer mentioned a December 2009 meeting with party officials. “I was upset because the political consultants and staff were talking about voter suppression and keeping blacks from voting,” he said, according to the Tampa Bay Times. He also said party officials discussed how “minority outreach programs were not fit for the Republican Party,” according to the AP.

The comments, if true (he is facing felony corruption charges and has an interest in scorning his party), would confirm what critics have long suspected. Florida Gov. Rick Scott is currently facing inquiries from the Justice Department and pressure from civil rights groups over his purging of voter rolls in the state, an effort that critics say has disproportionately targeted minorities and other Democratic voters. One group suing the state claims up to 87 percent of the voters purged from the rolls so far have been people of color, though other estimates place that number far lower. Scott has defended the purge, even though he was erroneously listed as dead himself on the rolls in 2006.

As Vanity Fair noted in a big 2004 story on the Sunshine State’s voting problems, “Florida is a state with a history of disenfranchising blacks.” In the state’s notoriously botched 2000 election, the state sent a list of 50,000 alleged ex-felons to the counties, instructing them to purge those names from their rolls. But it turned out that list included 20,000 innocent people, 54 percent of whom were black, the magazine reported. Just 15 percent of the state’s population is black. There were also reports that polling stations in black neighborhoods were understaffed, leading to long lines that kept some people from voting that year. The NAACP and ACLU sued the state over that purge. A Gallup poll in December of 2000 found that 68 percent of African-Americans nationally felt black voters were less likely to have their votes counted fairly in Florida.

Former Republican Gov. Charlie Crist, who has since become an independent and is rumored to be considering his next run as a Democrat, wrote an Op-Ed in the Washington Post recently slamming Scott’s current purge. “Including as many Americans as possible in our electoral process is the spirit of our country. It is why we have expanded rights to women and minorities but never legislated them away, and why we have lowered the voting age but never raised it. Cynical efforts at voter suppression are driven by an un-American desire to exclude as many people and silence as many voices as possible,” he wrote. A recent study from the Brennan Center for Justice at NYU Law School found that voter ID laws disproportionately affect poor, minority and elderly voters.

_____________________________

Curious about the "Sluts Vote" avatars? See http://www.collarchat.com/m_4133036/mpage_1/key_/tm.htm#4133036

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: Voting rulings - 9/7/2012 10:47:18 AM   
graceadieu


Posts: 1518
Joined: 3/20/2008
From: Maryland
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: dcnovice

FR

I have long thought that redistricting should be done by nonpartisan geographers--imported from abroad if necessary--rather than left to legislators, of either party, with agendas of their own.


I agree. When partisan legislators redistrict a state purely to help their own party be more likely to get elected, it at worst effectively disenfranchises parts of the electorate and at best causes voters to become cynical and disaffected.

Maryland redistricted this year in a pretty gerrymandering sort of way. It was a transparent effort to get more Democratic candidates elected to the House by cutting up conservative rural districts and combining them with more populous parts of liberal suburban districts, and it just pissed everybody off. I'm a pretty loyal liberal Democrat, but it wasn't right or moral, and made me feel like the state branch of the Democratic party is corrupt. (And I wasn't the only one - the guy that's the Democratic candidate in my new former district ran a primary campaign mainly about how corrupt his own party is!)

< Message edited by graceadieu -- 9/7/2012 10:50:09 AM >

(in reply to dcnovice)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: Voting rulings - 9/7/2012 11:08:05 AM   
FMRFGOPGAL


Posts: 763
Joined: 9/1/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

While the focus is on the conventions....

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A U.S. federal court ruled on Tuesday that controversial Texas redistricting maps discriminate against black and Hispanic voters, effectively killing the new districts before they could take effect for the November 6 presidential election.

The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia issued the ruling. The state maps, passed by the Republican-dominated Texas legislature, redrew districts in a way that reduced the influence of minority voters, the court ruled.



November's election will likely use interim maps drawn by a federal court in San Antonio instead.

The Obama administration in 2011 blocked the maps, arguing they violated the 1965 Voting Rights Act, a law designed to protect the voting rights of minorities, primarily blacks in Southern states.

In rejecting the maps, the court could have stopped at ruling that they had a discriminatory effect, but it took the further step of ruling that the Texas legislature had a discriminatory intent in its drawing of the maps.

Under the Voting Rights Act, Texas had the burden to prove that its maps did not discriminate, nor that they intended to.

Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott said in a statement that he would appeal the decision to the U.S. Supreme Court. He called the ruling an extension of the Voting Rights Act beyond what Congress had intended.

The three-judge panel consisted of Judge Thomas Griffith and Judge Rosemary M. Collyer, who were both appointed by President George W. Bush — formerly the governor of Texas - and Judge Beryl A. Howell, appointed by President Barack Obama.


http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2012-08-28/news/sns-rt-us-usa-texas-voter-idbre87r140-20120828_1_interim-maps-texas-legislature-voter-identification-law

and...

A federal judge on Wednesday said he was prepared to grant a permanent injunction that would block controversial restrictions on voter registration groups passed by Florida Gov. Rick Scott (R) last year.

Federal Judge Robert L. Hinkle had earlier put a temporary hold on the measure, declaring that it put "harsh and impractical" restrictions on civic groups focused on registering new voters. In his latest order, Hinkle stated that he intends to permanently block the law, pending the case's dismissal from a Court of Appeals. The plaintiffs and the state of Florida have reportedly agreed not to appeal Hinkle's ruling.


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/29/florida-voter-registration-groups_n_1840146.html


A pretty good Friday for truth, justice, and reason.
   Good post!

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: Voting rulings - 9/7/2012 1:13:37 PM   
kalikshama


Posts: 14805
Joined: 8/8/2010
Status: offline
I was very moved watching the video of Civil Rights Icon John Lewis's speech.

Civil Rights Icon John Lewis: GOP Voter Suppression Laws Are 'Not Right,' 'Not Fair,' 'Not Just'

At the DNC Thursday night, civil rights leader Rep. John Lewis (D-GA) recounted his fight for voting rights, the progress made, and the continued threat to ensuring the right to vote for all Americans. Lewis, who still bears scars from beatings in his struggle for racial equality told the DNC audience “we have come too far together to ever turn back.” Yet he warned that Republican-led voter suppression laws are taking America back in that direction:

Brothers and sisters, do you want to go back? Or do you want to keep America moving forward? My dear friends, your vote is precious, almost sacred. It is the most powerful, nonviolent tool we have to create a more perfect union. Not too long ago, people stood in unmovable lines. They had to pass a so-called literacy test, pay a poll tax. On one occasion, a man was asked to count the number of bubbles in a bar of soap. On another occasion, one was asked to count the jelly beans in a jar—all to keep them from casting their ballots.

Today it is unbelievable that there are Republican officials still trying to stop some people from voting. They are changing the rules, cutting polling hours and imposing requirements intended to suppress the vote. The Republican leader in the Pennsylvania House even bragged that his state’s new voter ID law is “gonna allow Governor Romney to win the state.” That’s not right. That’s not fair. That’s not just.


Watch Video

Courts recently struck down a series of voter suppression tactics spearheaded by Republicans in Florida, Ohio, Texas, and Wisconsin. Republicans defend many of these tactics as necessary to fight “voter fraud,” but the kinds of voter fraud addressed by the GOP’s favorite tactics are less common than people getting struck by lightning.

< Message edited by kalikshama -- 9/7/2012 1:15:54 PM >


_____________________________

Curious about the "Sluts Vote" avatars? See http://www.collarchat.com/m_4133036/mpage_1/key_/tm.htm#4133036

(in reply to FMRFGOPGAL)
Profile   Post #: 14
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> Voting rulings Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.203