emeraldgryphon -> RE: ARE WE FREAKS!!! (9/10/2012 7:51:26 AM)
|
I'm just a little confused by your syntax and grammar. I'll assume, rightly or wrongly, that English isn't your primary language? quote:
ORIGINAL: NightMeow To some we are freaks in this world for are life style and choice in word are different thus i shall make this a day to be remembered. (I don't see anything herein contained of such earth-shattering or momentous importance.) For it is the life you picked and you are stuck with. (I'm not stuck with any of my life choices - in the final tally all I really have to do is eat, breathe, defecate, and die. Everything else is optional, and can be easily changed, altered, or rescinded.) thus we stand at your side and choose not to see and there are those that do wish to see what is behind the wall. (So the community you are identifying with by your use of "we" is choosing to be blind to certain nebulous events that somehow impede the progression of linear life choices and results thereby acquired?) for it is that wall that hold your path at bay. (I fail to see any sequentia of actual weight that could impede any choice I happen to make.) Open you eyes and mind and turn to the person next to you and tell them the same thing i am telling you. WAKE UP FROM YOUR DREAM. for that dream is false you must see before you lose it all. (Generally good advice, if rather quixotic in nature. Regardless of modern definitions and redefinitions of the nature of "reality", our world actually is a place of fairly finite possibility, and the concept of a "Matrix-like" constrained reality doesn't actually work except in the paradigm of the movie world. Again, to "lose" something implies that you set value by that something, be it property, career, wealth, status, etc. In the final tally, again, things are far simpler than that, and most people who "lose" it "all" find that if they can survive the shattering of their pre-conceived notions about "reality", find that the things they used to think were important really aren't, and the things they had previously dismissed are the only things worth holding onto.) So given my comments and their possible alteration of the definitions behind the concepts I think you are talking about, can you refine your statements so as to leave no ambiguity as to your meanings?
|
|
|
|