RE: Rick Santorum finally speaks truth (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


DesideriScuri -> RE: Rick Santorum finally speaks truth (10/2/2012 8:10:23 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl
quote:

Finland, while nothing spectacular, is tracking right along with the OECD average.

But your complaint with the Dept of Ed is that our scores have dropped. Finland, being 2nd in the world.. and offering a free education to boot, should make you understand that a government run educational system isnt all that bad, if done correctly.


Are you saying that the Finland model is the model our DoEd is attempting to emulate?

And, I was talking economics, not school achievement. Sorry if I didn't make that explicit.

quote:

quote:

So, an aptitude test will be the arbiter of where you can go in the Market. Gotcha. Shall we do that before HS, so that we can spend those 4 years gearing them up for their slot? Or, before? Or, after? Or, whenever they decide to change their goals? What is to prevent someone from continuing to get a similar, but different major after the first one? Would you have to take another aptitude test?
What if the aptitude tests aren't blind (as in, they are weighted against certain population segments)?

You mean like the SAT's were?


Exactly. Or the standardized IQ tests purported to be weighted against blacks (no idea if that accusation was proven or refuted).

But, you do realize, you haven't answered my question, right?




tazzygirl -> RE: Rick Santorum finally speaks truth (10/2/2012 8:25:58 PM)

quote:

Exactly. Or the standardized IQ tests purported to be weighted against blacks (no idea if that accusation was proven or refuted).

But, you do realize, you haven't answered my question, right?


yes, I did.

Lost in all the debate is this simple fact: Income, not race, is the real determining factor in higher education today. Millions of otherwise-qualified high school students aren’t attending college, either because they can’t afford it or because the admissions system screens them out.

Some statistics: While 79% of students born into the top income quartile in the U.S. obtain bachelor’s degrees, only 11% of students from bottom-quartile families graduate from four-year universities, according to Postsecondary Education Opportunity. Put another way, about 55% of the bachelor’s degrees awarded in the U.S. went to students from top-quartile families with 2010 income above $98,875; 9.4% of those degrees went to students with family income below $33,000.

“It’s a far greater disparity than anything we’d talk about with race,” says Richard Sander, a professor at the UCLA School of Law who studies racial and economic disparities in higher education. “The pervasive problem in admissions offices is class-ism, not racism — they’re biased against low-income students.”


http://www.forbes.com/sites/danielfisher/2012/05/02/poor-students-are-the-real-victims-of-college-discrimination/

The SATs used to ask questions like.. cup is to saucer... and some kids from low income families had no clue what a saucer was.

Its not the DeptofEd who administers these tests.

The SAT is a standardized test for college admissions in the United States. The SAT is owned, published, and developed by the College Board, a nonprofit organization in the United States. It was formerly developed, published, and scored by the Educational Testing Service[1] which still administers the exam. The test is intended to assess a student's readiness for college. It was first introduced in 1926, and its name and scoring have changed several times. It was first called the Scholastic Aptitude Test, then the Scholastic Assessment Test, but now SAT does not stand for anything, hence it is an empty acronym.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SAT




tazzygirl -> RE: Rick Santorum finally speaks truth (10/2/2012 8:30:32 PM)

quote:

Are you saying that the Finland model is the model our DoEd is attempting to emulate?

And, I was talking economics, not school achievement. Sorry if I didn't make that explicit.


lol... no... I am saying maybe its one we should be emulating.

You were talking both academic and economics, you have been all over this thread.




DesideriScuri -> RE: Rick Santorum finally speaks truth (10/3/2012 5:46:22 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl
quote:

Are you saying that the Finland model is the model our DoEd is attempting to emulate?
And, I was talking economics, not school achievement. Sorry if I didn't make that explicit.

lol... no... I am saying maybe its one we should be emulating.
You were talking both academic and economics, you have been all over this thread.


What is the purpose of educating everyone? Is it not so they can have more potential to benefit the economy? Finland is the only country of those you mentioned that has an economy that isn't down or slowing down. They are tracking the OECD average, in regards to their economic activity.

So, I'm not sure Finland is one to emulate.

We agree that the SAT's were at one point biased. I can not attest to their fixing or not fixing that issue.

The question you have yet to answer is how we are to determine who merits the education and who does not. You said aptitude tests. I brought up that aptitude tests could be biased. You agreed. Thus, you have agreed that your proposed way of determining who merits a further education (on the taxpayer's dime) could be biased against those of lower socioeconomic status. You even stated that aptitude tests are a better way to make that determination rather than relying simply on money. So, your correction of relying solely on money (which would be those of lower socioeconomic status) is to rely on aptitude tests that could be biased against those of lower socioeconomic status.

Forgive me for not seeing how you've answered my question.




mnottertail -> RE: Rick Santorum finally speaks truth (10/3/2012 6:42:18 AM)

quote:


So, I'm not sure Finland is one to emulate.


What is so unemulateable about Finland?




GotSteel -> RE: Rick Santorum finally speaks truth (10/3/2012 7:39:59 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl
Santorum.. and I disagree.

That's generally a good sign since Santorum and reality don't seem to be on speaking terms.

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl
Not all education beyond high school has to be taught at a 4 year school.

However in this case I suspect that you may be mistaken about some of the details about Santorum's position. Santorum is also perfectly well aware of options other than "4 year school".

“There's technical schools. There's additional training, vocational training. There's skills and apprenticeships. There's all sorts of things that people can do to upgrade their skills, to be very productive and great workers here in America who provide for their families and build their community.” -Rick Santorum

The difference is that President Obama wants Americans to be more educated where as Rick Santorum wants us to be less educated.




DesideriScuri -> RE: Rick Santorum finally speaks truth (10/3/2012 8:06:18 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
quote:


So, I'm not sure Finland is one to emulate.

What is so unemulateable about Finland?


Have you not been following tazzy's and my posts?

Ron, I'd like to introduce you to a friend of mine. Reading. Reading, this is Ron.

Let the fireworks begin. [8D]




mnottertail -> RE: Rick Santorum finally speaks truth (10/3/2012 8:16:04 AM)

Oh, I might occasionally read half those posts, because of factual issues.

I don't quite see what is unemulatable about Finland.




tazzygirl -> RE: Rick Santorum finally speaks truth (10/3/2012 9:07:14 AM)

My disagreement was related to the "snob" comment. They both brought up the same options... Santorum decided Obama was a snob for the same thing he said. A hypocrite is quickly discovered.




GotSteel -> RE: Rick Santorum finally speaks truth (10/3/2012 9:15:25 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
I don't quite see what is unemulatable about Finland.


He wasn't saying that Finland is "unemulatable" but that it shouldn't be emulated because it's economy doesn't suck.




tazzygirl -> RE: Rick Santorum finally speaks truth (10/3/2012 9:19:00 AM)

quote:

We agree that the SAT's were at one point biased. I can not attest to their fixing or not fixing that issue.


They still are. Google is your friend.

quote:

The question you have yet to answer is how we are to determine who merits the education and who does not.


You seem to believe only certain people merit an education. I disagree. I believe everyone merits an education. Someone who is good with their hands is not going to want to become a high finance guru. Someone with a drive towards since wont want to enter the construction field.

So, answer this. How do you determine who doesnt deserve an education?

quote:

So, I'm not sure Finland is one to emulate.


Considering Finland....

“Countries need an increasingly educated and skilled workforce to succeed in today’s knowledge economy,” said OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurría. “Investing from an early age is crucial to lay the foundations of later success. High quality education and skills have to be among the number one priorities for governments, for economies and for societies. Supporting the poorest and ensuring equal access is another important pillar in an inclusive education policy strategy.”

Australia, Finland, Ireland and Sweden have the highest success rates in the OECD for young people with poorly-educated parents attaining a tertiary degree. But in Italy, Portugal, Turkey and the United States, more than 40% of young people from low educational backgrounds have not completed upper secondary education, and less than 20% have attained tertiary qualifications.

http://www.oecd.org/newsroom/educationspendingrisingbutaccesstohighereducationremainsunequalinmostcountriessaysoecd.htm

Finland: Slow and Steady Reform for Consistently High Results

Finland is one of the world’s leaders in the academic performance of its
secondary school students, a position it has held for the past decade.
This top performance is also remarkably consistent across schools. Finnish
schools seem to serve all students well, regardless of family background,
socio-economic status or ability. This chapter looks at the possible factors
behind this success, which include political consensus to educate all
children together in a common school system; an expectation that all
children can achieve at high levels, regardless of family background or
regional circumstance; single-minded pursuit of teaching excellence;
collective school responsibility for learners who are struggling; modest
financial resources that are tightly focused on the classroom and a climate
of trust between educators and the community.


Again, as Ron asked... what is wrong with emulating Finland's educational system?




mnottertail -> RE: Rick Santorum finally speaks truth (10/3/2012 9:40:38 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: GotSteel

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
I don't quite see what is unemulatable about Finland.


He wasn't saying that Finland is "unemulatable" but that it shouldn't be emulated because it's economy doesn't suck.



So, fill me in on what else I missed, which economy that sucks should we be emulating accordingly?




DesideriScuri -> RE: Rick Santorum finally speaks truth (10/3/2012 12:36:47 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl
quote:

We agree that the SAT's were at one point biased. I can not attest to their fixing or not fixing that issue.

They still are. Google is your friend.


Truth? Not my problem, nor within my area to fix. I only mentioned that I was not able to attest to the fixing because I haven't looked. And, Google is my friend, as you should already know. But, since I haven't Googled it, what do you think that means as far as it's priority with me?

quote:

quote:

The question you have yet to answer is how we are to determine who merits the education and who does not.

You seem to believe only certain people merit an education. I disagree. I believe everyone merits an education. Someone who is good with their hands is not going to want to become a high finance guru. Someone with a drive towards since wont want to enter the construction field.
So, answer this. How do you determine who doesnt deserve an education?


While I agree that a handy person may not gravitate towards "high finance," the lure of the "big bucks" just might be enough. Isn't that why people go to college anyway; to get an education that will lead to a higher paying job? Let's not overlook that a handy person could very easily use hobbies as an outlet for that handiness while the high finance job pays the bills and affords the hobbies.

And, turning a question around still isn't an answer. But, to answer yours, the only people who merit a higher education (post-HS university/college) are the ones with the drive and ability to succeed, or the money to blow. But, we can rule out those people who have the drive, because they'll find a way if they're driven.

quote:

quote:

So, I'm not sure Finland is one to emulate.

Considering Finland....
Countries need an increasingly educated and skilled workforce to succeed in today’s knowledge economy,” said OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurría. “Investing from an early age is crucial to lay the foundations of later success. High quality education and skills have to be among the number one priorities for governments, for economies and for societies. Supporting the poorest and ensuring equal access is another important pillar in an inclusive education policy strategy.”


Remember the bolded part for just a little bit later...

quote:


Australia, Finland, Ireland and Sweden have the highest success rates in the OECD for young people with poorly-educated parents attaining a tertiary degree. But in Italy, Portugal, Turkey and the United States, more than 40% of young people from low educational backgrounds have not completed upper secondary education, and less than 20% have attained tertiary qualifications.
http://www.oecd.org/newsroom/educationspendingrisingbutaccesstohighereducationremainsunequalinmostcountriessaysoecd.htm
Finland: Slow and Steady Reform for Consistently High Results
Finland is one of the world’s leaders in the academic performance of its
secondary school students, a position it has held for the past decade.
This top performance is also remarkably consistent across schools. Finnish
schools seem to serve all students well, regardless of family background,
socio-economic status or ability. This chapter looks at the possible factors
behind this success, which include political consensus to educate all
children together in a common school system; an expectation that all
children can achieve at high levels, regardless of family background or
regional circumstance; single-minded pursuit of teaching excellence;
collective school responsibility for learners who are struggling; modest
financial resources that are tightly focused on the classroom and a climate
of trust between educators and the community.

Again, as Ron asked... what is wrong with emulating Finland's educational system?


Academic performance isn't the end-all be-all. US graduation rates are rising, too. Apparently, Finland's successful school system doesn't seem to be helping the economy all that much, since the economy is simply tracking the OECD average. Sweden was doing quite well, but has started to slow. I wonder if their educational system has had a similar lull (probably not).

And, this is just so fucking beautiful that I have to requote it...
    quote:

    This chapter looks at the possible factors
    behind this success, which include political consensus to educate all
    children together in a common school system
    ...


See? They are already looking at what you've claimed is taking things to an extreme.





DesideriScuri -> RE: Rick Santorum finally speaks truth (10/3/2012 12:41:58 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: GotSteel
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
I don't quite see what is unemulatable about Finland.

He wasn't saying that Finland is "unemulatable" but that it shouldn't be emulated because it's economy doesn't suck.


Not exactly GS. Finland is the only country mentioned that is continuing to move forward, though it is merely tracking along with the OECD average. Sweden had been the stellar economy, but it is now faltering. So, emulating Finland might get us toaverage. That might be okay for you, but I do believe the US can do much, much better.




mnottertail -> RE: Rick Santorum finally speaks truth (10/3/2012 12:42:17 PM)

That republican created and built land grant college and public school system got us a hell of a long ways before they were for it before they were against it, it is clear to see that such dreck as no child left behind has went a long way towards leaving us behind.




mnottertail -> RE: Rick Santorum finally speaks truth (10/3/2012 12:45:05 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: GotSteel
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
I don't quite see what is unemulatable about Finland.

He wasn't saying that Finland is "unemulatable" but that it shouldn't be emulated because it's economy doesn't suck.


Not exactly GS. Finland is the only country mentioned that is continuing to move forward, though it is merely tracking along with the OECD average. Sweden had been the stellar economy, but it is now faltering. So, emulating Finland might get us toaverage. That might be okay for you, but I do believe the US can do much, much better.


We should aspire to average, since we are doing far less than that.




tazzygirl -> RE: Rick Santorum finally speaks truth (10/3/2012 1:24:08 PM)

quote:

Truth? Not my problem, nor within my area to fix. I only mentioned that I was not able to attest to the fixing because I haven't looked. And, Google is my friend, as you should already know. But, since I haven't Googled it, what do you think that means as far as it's priority with me?


You want people to do your research... its been obvious since day one. When they wont, you accuse them of either giving false information to try and goad them into it, or you claim you really dont care.

Nothing new.

quote:

While I agree that a handy person may not gravitate towards "high finance," the lure of the "big bucks" just might be enough. Isn't that why people go to college anyway; to get an education that will lead to a higher paying job? Let's not overlook that a handy person could very easily use hobbies as an outlet for that handiness while the high finance job pays the bills and affords the hobbies.


A mechanic can make.. what... 15 - 25 an hour starting out? 30K to 50K.

A nurse, the same. Two years of education for both. (Except nursing in one state)

Not bad money. Both can upgrade their skills and education while on the job... earning those smaller bucks while the high finance guys are still in school. Yeah, I can see many hands on people vying for those jobs.

quote:

And, turning a question around still isn't an answer. But, to answer yours, the only people who merit a higher education (post-HS university/college) are the ones with the drive and ability to succeed, or the money to blow. But, we can rule out those people who have the drive, because they'll find a way if they're driven.


Having the drive doesnt always equate to being able to finance. Unfortunately, you are the only one on these boards who sees that. In the real world, its an understood problem by many.

quote:

Academic performance isn't the end-all be-all. US graduation rates are rising, too. Apparently, Finland's successful school system doesn't seem to be helping the economy all that much, since the economy is simply tracking the OECD average. Sweden was doing quite well, but has started to slow. I wonder if their educational system has had a similar lull (probably not).


Considering the rest of the economies arent even doing that well, seems to me they are doing many things right.

This chapter looks at the possible factors behind this success, which include

political consensus to educate all children together in a common school system;

an expectation that all children can achieve at high levels, regardless of family background or regional circumstance;

single-minded pursuit of teaching excellence;

collective school responsibility for learners who are struggling;

modest financial resources that are tightly focused on the classroom and a climate of trust between educators and the community.



Seems to me they are not only happy with what they are doing, but with the results of how they are doing it. Only you would see the first part as a negative. Its a common school system .





DesideriScuri -> RE: Rick Santorum finally speaks truth (10/3/2012 1:41:29 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
That republican created and built land grant college and public school system got us a hell of a long ways before they were for it before they were against it, it is clear to see that such dreck as no child left behind has went a long way towards leaving us behind.


How do you define "a hell of a long ways?" 40 years?




DesideriScuri -> RE: Rick Santorum finally speaks truth (10/3/2012 1:43:01 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
We should aspire to average, since we are doing far less than that.


Never should anyone aspire to average. One of the biggest threats to excellence.




DesideriScuri -> RE: Rick Santorum finally speaks truth (10/3/2012 1:52:37 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl
quote:

Truth? Not my problem, nor within my area to fix. I only mentioned that I was not able to attest to the fixing because I haven't looked. And, Google is my friend, as you should already know. But, since I haven't Googled it, what do you think that means as far as it's priority with me?

You want people to do your research... its been obvious since day one. When they wont, you accuse them of either giving false information to try and goad them into it, or you claim you really dont care.
Nothing new.


You do realize that it was you that brought up aptitude tests and my bringing up the SAT's being biased, right? I didn't ask anyone if it had been changed or hadn't been changed. You can feel like you need to correct me on shit tons of stuff, but, do us both a favor and answer the questions asked.

quote:

quote:

While I agree that a handy person may not gravitate towards "high finance," the lure of the "big bucks" just might be enough. Isn't that why people go to college anyway; to get an education that will lead to a higher paying job? Let's not overlook that a handy person could very easily use hobbies as an outlet for that handiness while the high finance job pays the bills and affords the hobbies.

A mechanic can make.. what... 15 - 25 an hour starting out? 30K to 50K.
A nurse, the same. Two years of education for both. (Except nursing in one state)
Not bad money. Both can upgrade their skills and education while on the job... earning those smaller bucks while the high finance guys are still in school. Yeah, I can see many hands on people vying for those jobs.


And then they'll be turned against the high finance guys who make more money than they do by politicians vying for their votes. Nurses can make some serious scratch with 4-6 years of education.

quote:

quote:

And, turning a question around still isn't an answer. But, to answer yours, the only people who merit a higher education (post-HS university/college) are the ones with the drive and ability to succeed, or the money to blow. But, we can rule out those people who have the drive, because they'll find a way if they're driven.

Having the drive doesnt always equate to being able to finance. Unfortunately, you are the only one on these boards who sees that. In the real world, its an understood problem by many.


"Where there's a will, there's a way." No clue who said it first and I don't care. It is appropriate here, though (see? I proclaimed my lack of caring as to who said it before you can tell me to google who said it, or before you google it and tell me).

quote:

quote:

Academic performance isn't the end-all be-all. US graduation rates are rising, too. Apparently, Finland's successful school system doesn't seem to be helping the economy all that much, since the economy is simply tracking the OECD average. Sweden was doing quite well, but has started to slow. I wonder if their educational system has had a similar lull (probably not).

Considering the rest of the economies arent even doing that well, seems to me they are doing many things right.


They were, no doubt. However, you'll have to show proof that it was their educational system and not some other factor for me to sign on to their style of education.

quote:

This chapter looks at the possible factors behind this success, which include
political consensus to educate all children together in a common school system;
an expectation that all children can achieve at high levels, regardless of family background or regional circumstance;
single-minded pursuit of teaching excellence;
collective school responsibility for learners who are struggling;
modest financial resources that are tightly focused on the classroom and a climate of trust between educators and the community.

Seems to me they are not only happy with what they are doing, but with the results of how they are doing it. Only you would see the first part as a negative. Its a common school system .


I didn't say anything negative about it? If you recall, I said that we'd have to take all the kids away from their homes and put them into government day cares so their backgrounds and upbringings don't weigh in on the education and support they get. It was you who made the claim that it was an outrageous leap on my part. But, do go on...




Page: <<   < prev  10 11 12 [13] 14   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.078125