RumpusParable
Posts: 1923
Joined: 7/7/2005 From: NYC now! Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: JustDragonflies RumpusParable, Now that's really interesting on it's own. Kind of a tangent, but why do you think that is, in regard to not being emotionally close without service in some capacity? And does it extend to platonic relationships too? I guess some would phrase it as "one of her primary love languages is acts of service". I'd just phrase it as "I like having things done for me". I feel appreciated when someone does something for me. The main reason I'm married to my husband is that he kissed my ass and waited on me from day one, starting the day we met. It's also the main reason I keep him. If he'd otherwise been him but without the personality of showing interest and affection through service, he wouldn't have become my best friend and then later lover and husband. He would've stayed a guy I got along with and worked in the same shop as. We wouldn't have cliqued in any way, on my end. Likewise, from the other direction, he wouldn't be with me if I didn't readily receive service *from* him. It's his primary way of expressing affection and feeling useful. As with that example, it's absolutely the case with platonic partners (friends, co-workers, subs, slaves..) of any sort. I like them better and feel more liked when a person does things for me... If they don't serve me in some way I don't establish an emotional connection at all with a person, light or intense.
_____________________________
Relationships come and go, but plastination is forever. I generally use fast-reply. If directing my post at someone specific I will indicate so. Minimal summary: Artist, Disabled Veteran, Vegan, Pornographer, and Agender dominant female.
|