RE: So THIS is what Obama meant by Most Transparent Administration Evah!

RE: So THIS is what Obama meant by Most Transparent Administration Evah! (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

Lucylastic -> RE: So THIS is what Obama meant by Most Transparent Administration Evah! (9/28/2012 9:40:27 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic got hoarse protesting them before Obama took over. BTW..like you...we have the option of responding or not, in the negative or positive to any question we chooose, not because you think we should. goose, meet gander And, now? Are you getting hoarse over Obama's usage? And, I do acknowledge everyone having the right of free choice to respond. But, isn't it at least a wee bit disingenuous when you give your guy a pass, but not the other guy? who is givinghim a pass, thats your assumption, you know nothing about my feelings towards the matter, but you assume, Im not giving him a pass in the slightest, that is only in your eyes...and you know just how much that concerns me. As for shouting myself hoarse???? im not into beating expired equines.. it will go on until someone has the sac to put a stop to it, Romney dont have it, Ryan dont have it, PAUL doesnt have it, where the hell is the expectation required for Obama to have it. There isnt a politician out there (that is sane) that has the sac. I do what I can with what I believe in, taking on the intelligence agencies of the world aint one of them. 1984 has been with us for years, as technology advances so will the intelligence.. how do you fight that????? how do you fight the big money financing it, they have the politicians in their pockets? every "civilised" country is the same.....Cos Im sick of the whole thing. Give me a logical .... idea...that would stop it all...

subspaceseven -> RE: So THIS is what Obama meant by Most Transparent Administration Evah! (9/28/2012 10:46:47 PM)
There where a hell of alot of them, but you only see what you want to see,,,So Bush makes it legal and you are ok with it, until the Dem President does it. Gee...

subspaceseven -> RE: So THIS is what Obama meant by Most Transparent Administration Evah! (9/28/2012 10:55:05 PM)
How long did it take you to as you say ...before waking up, politically.... before you came out against the wire taps??? I mean under Bush???or is it just under Obama??? you bitch about them?? But you still support the party that started it all.... So you supported starting the fire....but then realized the fire is out control..but still support the people who started it and put full blame on the people using the fire started with your support???

DesideriScuri -> RE: So THIS is what Obama meant by Most Transparent Administration Evah! (9/29/2012 2:51:26 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic quote: ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic got hoarse protesting them before Obama took over. BTW..like you...we have the option of responding or not, in the negative or positive to any question we chooose, not because you think we should. goose, meet gander And, now? Are you getting hoarse over Obama's usage? And, I do acknowledge everyone having the right of free choice to respond. But, isn't it at least a wee bit disingenuous when you give your guy a pass, but not the other guy? who is givinghim a pass, thats your assumption, you know nothing about my feelings towards the matter, but you assume, Im not giving him a pass in the slightest, that is only in your eyes...and you know just how much that concerns me. As for shouting myself hoarse???? im not into beating expired equines.. it will go on until someone has the sac to put a stop to it, Romney dont have it, Ryan dont have it, PAUL doesnt have it, where the hell is the expectation required for Obama to have it. There isnt a politician out there (that is sane) that has the sac. I do what I can with what I believe in, taking on the intelligence agencies of the world aint one of them. You protested yourself hoarse in opposition to Bush's use. You stated that yourself. Yet, you are not being consistent with that sentiment. That's giving Obama a pass. Obama had the sack to rail against it during the '08 campaign. Lots of Democrats officials had the sack to rail against their use. Yet, when it's their turn to use or not to use, what do they do? They use. quote: 1984 has been with us for years, as technology advances so will the intelligence.. how do you fight that????? how do you fight the big money financing it, they have the politicians in their pockets? every "civilised" country is the same.....Cos Im sick of the whole thing. Give me a logical .... idea...that would stop it all... Apparently, a big hammer.

DesideriScuri -> RE: So THIS is what Obama meant by Most Transparent Administration Evah! (9/29/2012 3:24:49 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: subspaceseven How long did it take you to as you say ...before waking up, politically.... before you came out against the wire taps??? I mean under Bush???or is it just under Obama??? you bitch about them?? But you still support the party that started it all.... As soon as it became apparent to me in 2008, that they were bullshit, I was against them. I was ignorant of the offal the Patriot Act is until my eyes were opened. My WABAC machine was in the shop for a lube/oil/filter, so I couldn't retroactively be against the Patriot Act. quote: So you supported starting the fire....but then realized the fire is out control..but still support the people who started it and put full blame on the people using the fire started with your support??? I still support conservatives - not necessarily Republicans. I am not a Republican. I'm more of a Libertarian. By your logic, I'm not allowed to participate in any political debates and never will be. I didn't say anything under President X because I wasn't paying attention. I started paying attention during President X's last year in office and didn't like what I had finally opened my eyes to. Now that President Y is in office (and of a different party), I can't say anything negative when he continues the practices that I found bad? When President Z is in office (in 4 months or 52 months), I won't be able to say anything negative if he/she continues the same practices because I didn't say anything about the previous two. I cast my vote McCain not because I thought McCain was a great candidate, but that Obama was that bad of one. Had McCain won and continued the crappy policies of Bush, I'd be complaining about it. If Romney wins and continues them, I'll be complaining then. Are you, ss7, for or against warrantless wiretaps? If you are for them, I think you're wrong, and we'll not come to any agreement. If you are against them, why are you going after me when we agree on this? I'm going to continue to follow my conscious and support what I believe is correct, regardless of what you think of me or accuse me of. That you can't appreciate those areas where we have common ground, I don't understand.

Lucylastic -> RE: So THIS is what Obama meant by Most Transparent Administration Evah! (9/29/2012 4:10:31 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic quote: ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic got hoarse protesting them before Obama took over. BTW..like you...we have the option of responding or not, in the negative or positive to any question we chooose, not because you think we should. goose, meet gander And, now? Are you getting hoarse over Obama's usage? And, I do acknowledge everyone having the right of free choice to respond. But, isn't it at least a wee bit disingenuous when you give your guy a pass, but not the other guy? who is givinghim a pass, thats your assumption, you know nothing about my feelings towards the matter, but you assume, Im not giving him a pass in the slightest, that is only in your eyes...and you know just how much that concerns me. As for shouting myself hoarse???? im not into beating expired equines.. it will go on until someone has the sac to put a stop to it, Romney dont have it, Ryan dont have it, PAUL doesnt have it, where the hell is the expectation required for Obama to have it. There isnt a politician out there (that is sane) that has the sac. I do what I can with what I believe in, taking on the intelligence agencies of the world aint one of them. You protested yourself hoarse in opposition to Bush's use. You stated that yourself. Yet, you are not being consistent with that sentiment. That's giving Obama a pass. Obama had the sack to rail against it during the '08 campaign. Lots of Democrats officials had the sack to rail against their use. Yet, when it's their turn to use or not to use, what do they do? They use. quote: 1984 has been with us for years, as technology advances so will the intelligence.. how do you fight that????? how do you fight the big money financing it, they have the politicians in their pockets? every "civilised" country is the same.....Cos Im sick of the whole thing. Give me a logical .... idea...that would stop it all... Apparently, a big hammer. Remember this??? who is givinghim a pass, thats your assumption, you know nothing about my feelings towards the matter, but you assume, Im not giving him a pass in the slightest, that is only in your eyes...and you know just how much that concerns me. Ya see, I wasnt ignorant about it, Im not even american and you are not the only country dealing with such a thing, so cry me a river in YOUR ignorance of it until Obama arrived, that is YOUR comprehension failing not mine. Dont expect Me to act like its so shocking, something new and that I should gird my loins and whine everytime you think something is important. BTW I said, no one has the sac to STOP it, not RAIL about it, that is a completely different term. Everybody rails about something, how much have YOU done to stop it? oh thats right, accuse others of giving this admin a pass [8\|]

Page: << < prev 1 [2]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

4.699707E-02