RE: The moon landing.

RE: The moon landing. (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

fucktoyprincess -> RE: The moon landing. (10/2/2012 2:10:00 PM)
FR Everyone has the right to their own opinion. It does not make one's opinion more accurate than anyone else. OP, you must still contend with the fact that you and your Dominant disagree about the moon landing. The overwhelming weight of the evidence suggests that the moon landing did occur. An overwhelming majority of human beings on the face of the planet believe the moon landing to have taken place at the time and date on which it is purported to have occurred. Either ignore that you and your Dominant feel differently about this, or make a mental note of it. In my own life, while I have friends who believe in all kinds of things, for my personal intimate relationships, I prefer to be with people who have a similar world view. You are free to be with someone who views the world differently. But then you have to accept that that is his viewpoint. I'm not really sure what the point of your question is anymore. [sm=2cents.gif]

PeonForHer -> RE: The moon landing. (10/2/2012 3:38:24 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: GotSteel I do recall seeing figures that conspiracy theorists are on the rise (though I'm having trouble quickly putting my hands on the source). I saw those figures but don't believe them. I think they were put together by an underground Nazi movement led by a clone of Hitler along with the Man from Atlantis and some circumcised communist Martians cunningly disguised as humans, all working in a huge laboratory underneath a grassy knoll in Area 51.

SternSkipper -> RE: The moon landing. (10/2/2012 5:30:15 PM)
Folks... I take personal responsibility for this one. I was chatting with some friends in Australia and convinced them it would be fun to go to all the video stores and move the copies of "Capricorn One" from the Sci-fi section to "Documentaries". In retrospect, I now see this wasn't one of my better ideas. Oh... If anyone comes in talking about what a big dick Romney has and that they didn't know he dated Seka.... My apologies in advance.

LookieNoNookie -> RE: The moon landing. (10/2/2012 6:00:01 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: stef Your "owner" is an idiot. Without trying to be redundant...... What Stef said.

LookieNoNookie -> RE: The moon landing. (10/2/2012 6:01:40 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: servantforuse I have to agree. Where are the photos of all of those other vehicles scattered around the moon ? Did all of the countries land there in secret ? If other were landing on the moon on a regular basis, the USA would know about it. Actually, if you want to see the lunar rover, go to Google earth and type in "Lunar Rover". You'll see it plain as day.

LookieNoNookie -> RE: The moon landing. (10/2/2012 6:03:12 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: lilmissdefiant quote: ORIGINAL: joether quote: ORIGINAL: stef Your "owner" is an idiot. He is not an idiot, he's just 'a few clowns short of a full circus!' Ok, let me say that, Back off on my Owner, he has his right to his own opinion. My Question is, who else believes the moon landing was faked? People with an IQ of bacon. The first response you got was accurate. (In case you may have lost that one over 65 responses....I believe it ran something along these lines: "Your owner is an idiot"). And actually, your question either "was" or "remains".

SternSkipper -> RE: The moon landing. (10/3/2012 8:17:05 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam quote: ORIGINAL: papassion 40 some years ago we had the technology to have a rocket blast off, orbit the earth, and return. But land live humans on the surface of the moon, then take off again, and return? With technology from over 40 years ago? From what i've read, no one was able to sucessfully land a lunar craft on fllight simulators. The fact that you think it was faked is all the more reason to be convinced it actually happened. For me, he just left us all the credibility challenge gift that keeps on giving.

Page: << < prev 1 2 3 [4]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875