cons Blow Another CIA Cover......At Shame Hearings.... (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Owner59 -> cons Blow Another CIA Cover......At Shame Hearings.... (10/11/2012 8:14:37 AM)

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/dana-milbank-letting-us-in-on-a-secret/2012/10/10/ba3136ca-132b-11e2-ba83-a7a396e6b2a7_story.html


"When House Republicans called a hearing in the middle of their long recess, you knew it would be something big, and indeed it was: They accidentally blew the CIA’s cover.

The purpose of Wednesday’s hearing of the Oversight and Government Reform Committee was to examine security lapses that led to the killing in Benghazi last month of the U.S. ambassador to Libya and three others. But in doing so, the lawmakers reminded us why “congressional intelligence” is an oxymoron."


The Republican lawmakers, in their outbursts, alternated between scolding the State Department officials for hiding behind classified material and blaming them for disclosing information that should have been classified. But the lawmakers created the situation by ordering a public hearing on a matter that belonged behind closed doors.


Republicans were aiming to embarrass the Obama administration over State Department security lapses. But they inadvertently caused a different picture to emerge than the one that has been publicly known: that the victims may have been let down not by the State Department but by the CIA. If the CIA was playing such a major role in these events, which was the unmistakable impression left by Wednesday’s hearing, having a televised probe of the matter was absurd




mnottertail -> RE: cons Blow Another CIA Cover......At Shame Hearings.... (10/11/2012 8:20:37 AM)

They are committing treason, the ineptitude of the teabaggers is without limit.

Take them out and shoot them.




subspaceseven -> RE: cons Blow Another CIA Cover......At Shame Hearings.... (10/11/2012 8:25:39 AM)

Better yet assign them to the embassy's they cut the security funding for, let them pick up a weapon and stand post, while not having any funding to have the security details they should have had




mnottertail -> RE: cons Blow Another CIA Cover......At Shame Hearings.... (10/11/2012 8:27:55 AM)

I see no need for weapons, they hysterically cry out constantly at every butterfly wing flapping, we can save a buck or two.




DomYngBlk -> RE: cons Blow Another CIA Cover......At Shame Hearings.... (10/11/2012 8:34:35 AM)

Couldn't agree more




Page: [1]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875