Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

Too Big to Fail?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> Too Big to Fail? Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Too Big to Fail? - 10/14/2012 11:20:02 PM   
BenevolentM


Posts: 3394
Joined: 11/15/2006
Status: offline
That our economic system was headed for a failure was obvious years in advance, yet no one in authority did anything about it. At least I did not contribute to the problem. The hands of neither party are clean.

Antitrust laws were not enforced and are not being enforced. The current architecture of our political system is based on the idea that our political parties are too big to fail. The truth is, they both failed us. When we go to the polls we are consistently faced with Wrong Headed Thinking Brand A verses Wrong Headed Thinking Brand B. That isn't much of a choice. The present two party system does not encourage compromise. It encourages tow the party line. In other words, our political system is monopolistic.

Do we have free enterprise? Instead of Republicans verses Democrats we have Corporations verses Government. When you have to tow a party line, you are not free. At the present time our only choice is to be beholden to corporations or government, but not both. Is that freedom and can either paradigm truly deliver? The truth is neither paradigm actually works. The truth is, the world continues to rotate about its axis due to a whole lot of sweat equity. Neither our government nor economic system is an automaton that just works. You have to get in there and fight. Fight for survival, but we don't fight to survive. We fight over luxury items.

No government let alone corporation has ever been too big to fail. If the government continues to shoulder the burden, it too will reach a point of no return and it too will fail. There has been enough hoping for the best. Hope is not what we need. What we need is sweat equity.

Both parties stone wall each other and call it a recipe for success. This is not a recipe for success. It is a recipe for destructive vacillations. We are oscillating like an oscillator that is out of control.

Is universal healthcare, for example, a luxury item? In one sense it is and in another sense it is not. It should be politically neutral, yet it isn't. Contrary to the propaganda, we are not pro private enterprise. We are pro quasi-governments. What do you think a too big to fail corporate entity is? As a quasi-government it is natural for government to come to its aid when it is in need. They are kin.

Much as mandatory automobile insurance is a tax, so is mandatory health insurance. All laws in some sense are a form of tax. Laws by their nature are taxing and are a form of income to the government. Your insurance company is a quasi-government entity and they do tell you how to run your business much like the government does.

If you cannot understand and appreciate what I wrote, it is because you are uneducated. I do not care if you are decreed and I don't care where you got your degree. You have a difficult time grappling with reality. I don't care if you make more than I do. You are a nitwit.
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: Too Big to Fail? - 10/15/2012 1:10:49 AM   
BenevolentM


Posts: 3394
Joined: 11/15/2006
Status: offline
The 2007 Financial Crisis was a strong empirical demonstration of exactly how out of touch people are. It was in our face, yet we did nothing. We just let it happen.

The Democrats argue statistics. The Presidential debates don't matter. I find that suspicious. Its like no ambassador of the United States has been murdered in the last 30 years and so it isn't going to happen. Ok, now let us examine the rocket scientist Republicans we have. They argue that there was intel indicating that there was going to be trouble that was ignored. Come on people. Put these two together: Middle East, Embassy. You don't need any fancy intel to know there is going to be trouble. Now put together the words: Middle East, Embassy, September 11th together. Yes, the people running our government are over paid and over educated. A lot of money could have been saved if they never went to college.

(in reply to BenevolentM)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: Too Big to Fail? - 10/15/2012 1:48:52 AM   
BenevolentM


Posts: 3394
Joined: 11/15/2006
Status: offline
"Because in much wisdom there is much grief, and increasing knowledge results in increasing pain."

Ecclesiastes 1:18
http://nasb.scripturetext.com/ecclesiastes/1.htm

Hence, wisdom implies a capacity to endure suffering.

(in reply to BenevolentM)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: Too Big to Fail? - 10/15/2012 2:11:37 AM   
BenevolentM


Posts: 3394
Joined: 11/15/2006
Status: offline
If religion is the opiate of the people, so too is politics. What do you say to a person who has never been in the presence of God? What do you say to a person who has never won God's respect?

(in reply to BenevolentM)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: Too Big to Fail? - 10/15/2012 2:09:11 PM   
BenevolentM


Posts: 3394
Joined: 11/15/2006
Status: offline
To quote mnottertail from his thread "Republicans are bad for business (the country as a whole, actually)" Post 3

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Gramm–Leach–Bliley Act (a purely regressive neo-con teabag) was the fall of Glass-Stegall


It would take too long to recite all the actions that chipped away at Glass-Steagall but a few highlights stand out. In the mid-1980s a Federal Reserve Board stocked with Reagan-Bush appointees began reinterpreting Glass-Steagall in a series of actions that slowly expanded the ability of banks to engage in other financial operations. In 1990, the Fed, under former J.P. Morgan director Alan Greenspan, permitted guess who–J.P. Morgan–to become the first bank allowed to underwrite securities. It is noteworthy that if William Jennings Bryan had had his way about the Federal Reserve Act, Greenspan would have never ascended to the position that allowed him to weaken the act named for the father of the Federal Reserve System.
Four legislative attempts were made to weaken or repeal parts of Glass-Steagall from 1988-1996. One reason they failed is because smaller banks feared that opening the doors to allow banks to trade in securities would lead to the domination of larger banks–a fate that has come to pass. The biggest change came in 1996 when Alan Greenspan issued a ruling allowing bank investment affiliates to have up to a quarter of their business in investments.
At this point, tremendous pressure was exerted on the Clinton Administration, which had earlier threatened to veto the Senate version, to sign the legislation, and intense negotiations continued over community reinvestment and consumer privacy provisions.

I can only find that quote on Wiki, and I am sure more was said.

http://thestrangedeathofliberalamerica.com/bill-clinton-glass-steagall-and-the-current-financial-and-mortgage-crisis-part-two-of-an-indepth-investigative-report.html

So, the destruction of america rightly falls on 'republicans'.


We Americans woke to discover that We the People were raped. No one was at the helm. No one was at the helm for some time. During this time what did we concern ourselves with? We were concerned whether or not the President had sex. Did we concern ourselves with what the President needed to be doing concerning the rise of terrorism? Did we concern ourselves with the sort of legislation that was being passed? No, we concerned ourselves with whether or not the President had sex.

Was President Clinton bullied? Was the scandal extortion on the part of the banking industry? Play ball or else?

(in reply to BenevolentM)
Profile   Post #: 5
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> Too Big to Fail? Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.061