quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Since 2010
They Blocked Obamas Jobs bill in 2011
They Blocked Wallstreet reform,
They Blocked AND defeated the Fair Pay act
They Blocked the Dream Act,
They Blocked the Anti Rape Amendment
They Blocked the Small Business Jobs Act not once but TWICE
They Blocked the repeal of Dont Ask Dont Tell numerous times then only with the support of 2 Repubs
They Blocked the Benefits for Homeless Vets
They Blocked the the Health care for 9/11 First Responders
They Blocked the Political Ad Disclosure Bull TWICE
They Blocked the Tax on companies that ship jobs overseas
They Blocked the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act(well attempted to)
They Blocked Oil Spill liability
They Blocked the Immigration reform
They voted 33 times to repeal the Affordable care act
Please dont ignore all those facts either
Actually it has been brought up about the fair pay injustice. but is ignored by most republican men as just being more "whitewash"

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

and your point is exactly what?

That it takes a woman to point out the "inequalities" in way to many workplaces?

Or are you trying to distract from the fact that I was talking about Congress' republican men?

quote:

ORIGINAL: mastercreeker

Fargle old buddy, how come female WH staffers average $11,00/yr less than their male counterparts?

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: mastercreeker

Fargle old buddy, how come female WH staffers average $11,00/yr less than their male counterparts?

WH staff are paid according to their job classification. So it simply is not true that women are paid less than men for the same work in the WH.

quote:

ORIGINAL: mastercreeker
Fargle old buddy, how come female WH staffers average $11,00/yr less than their male counterparts? And why did Mittens have a higher percentage of female staffers than any SITTING Dem governor. AND THIS WHOLE THING WOULD NOT HAVE COME UP, YOU OLD FOOL, IF THE WORD PORTFOLIO HAD BEEN SUBSTITUTED FOR BINDER. Geez,get a clue, will ya

• A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  
• Personal Responsibility
  
• Help for the truly needy
  
• Limited Government
  
• Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)
  

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: mastercreeker
Fargle old buddy, how come female WH staffers average $11,00/yr less than their male counterparts? And why did Mittens have a higher percentage of female staffers than any SITTING Dem governor. AND THIS WHOLE THING WOULD NOT HAVE COME UP, YOU OLD FOOL, IF THE WORD PORTFOLIO HAD BEEN SUBSTITUTED FOR BINDER. Geez,get a clue, will ya

Unless there is proof that women get paid less for the same position and with the same amount of experience, the $11,000/yr. number is meaningless.

It'd be like asking you if a guy was obese because his weight was 300#. Obviously, you could guess and have a 50/50 chance of being correct, but you wouldn't know unless you knew how tall the guy was and who the guy was. Lou Ferrigno is not obese and he was up to 300#.

quote:

ORIGINAL: chatterbox24

Oh just vote for Obama, and be done with it.

Thats what I am doing.

Blah.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Yachtie

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

and your point is exactly what?

That it takes a woman to point out the "inequalities" in way to many workplaces?

Or are you trying to distract from the fact that I was talking about Congress' republican men?

MSNBC doesn't need Congress' republican men to equalize pay. You though, in order to feel good about yourself, do need Congress' republican men to force liberal MSNBC to bend to your wishes. And what's funniest is that you don't even work for MSNBC.

You're such a do-gooder ... helping others to do what they could do themselves if they wanted to

quote:

ORIGINAL: Baroana

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: mastercreeker
Fargle old buddy, how come female WH staffers average $11,00/yr less than their male counterparts? And why did Mittens have a higher percentage of female staffers than any SITTING Dem governor. AND THIS WHOLE THING WOULD NOT HAVE COME UP, YOU OLD FOOL, IF THE WORD PORTFOLIO HAD BEEN SUBSTITUTED FOR BINDER. Geez,get a clue, will ya

Unless there is proof that women get paid less for the same position and with the same amount of experience, the $11,000/yr. number is meaningless.
It'd be like asking you if a guy was obese because his weight was 300#. Obviously, you could guess and have a 50/50 chance of being correct, but you wouldn't know unless you knew how tall the guy was and who the guy was. Lou Ferrigno is not obese and he was up to 300#.

What proof are you looking for? Been to the courthouse lately?

• A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  
• Personal Responsibility
  
• Help for the truly needy
  
• Limited Government
  
• Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)
  

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: Baroana

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: mastercreeker
Fargle old buddy, how come female WH staffers average $11,00/yr less than their male counterparts? And why did Mittens have a higher percentage of female staffers than any SITTING Dem governor. AND THIS WHOLE THING WOULD NOT HAVE COME UP, YOU OLD FOOL, IF THE WORD PORTFOLIO HAD BEEN SUBSTITUTED FOR BINDER. Geez,get a clue, will ya

Unless there is proof that women get paid less for the same position and with the same amount of experience, the $11,000/yr. number is meaningless.
It'd be like asking you if a guy was obese because his weight was 300#. Obviously, you could guess and have a 50/50 chance of being correct, but you wouldn't know unless you knew how tall the guy was and who the guy was. Lou Ferrigno is not obese and he was up to 300#.

What proof are you looking for? Been to the courthouse lately?

Haven't been to a courthouse since May, though I'm not sure what the fuck that has to do with anything.

I'd like to see a direct comparison of the salaries according to position. If you compare a female secretary's salary to a male CFO's salary, you could come to the conclusion that she is underpaid. But, if you take into account that they aren't the same position, it doesn't point to any conclusion about gender pay discrepancy.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Baroana

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: Baroana

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: mastercreeker
Fargle old buddy, how come female WH staffers average $11,00/yr less than their male counterparts? And why did Mittens have a higher percentage of female staffers than any SITTING Dem governor. AND THIS WHOLE THING WOULD NOT HAVE COME UP, YOU OLD FOOL, IF THE WORD PORTFOLIO HAD BEEN SUBSTITUTED FOR BINDER. Geez,get a clue, will ya

Unless there is proof that women get paid less for the same position and with the same amount of experience, the $11,000/yr. number is meaningless.
It'd be like asking you if a guy was obese because his weight was 300#. Obviously, you could guess and have a 50/50 chance of being correct, but you wouldn't know unless you knew how tall the guy was and who the guy was. Lou Ferrigno is not obese and he was up to 300#.

What proof are you looking for? Been to the courthouse lately?

Haven't been to a courthouse since May, though I'm not sure what the fuck that has to do with anything.
I'd like to see a direct comparison of the salaries according to position. If you compare a female secretary's salary to a male CFO's salary, you could come to the conclusion that she is underpaid. But, if you take into account that they aren't the same position, it doesn't point to any conclusion about gender pay discrepancy.

First of all, I hope that dump you're taking comes out soon, because you look uncomfortable.
Now, if you are unfamiliar with the concept of gender discrimination in the workplace, I suggest you do return to your local courthouse. Even better, do some research right from your toilet - er, desktop.

• A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  
• Personal Responsibility
  
• Help for the truly needy
  
• Limited Government
  
• Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)
  

quote:

ORIGINAL: Baroana

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: mastercreeker

Fargle old buddy, how come female WH staffers average $11,00/yr less than their male counterparts?

WH staff are paid according to their job classification. So it simply is not true that women are paid less than men for the same work in the WH.

I think it is being insinuated that on balance, the women hold lower grade positions, but thanks for playing.

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Baroana

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: mastercreeker

Fargle old buddy, how come female WH staffers average $11,00/yr less than their male counterparts?

WH staff are paid according to their job classification. So it simply is not true that women are paid less than men for the same work in the WH.

I think it is being insinuated that on balance, the women hold lower grade positions, but thanks for playing.

Then they aren't doing the same work are they?

quote:

ORIGINAL: mastercreeker

Gee that is really funny.....as a male, my name was also in a couple of binders, heading resumes. Thank God for those binders, because in two different cases, whoever they were brought to decided to hire me. Another O bama campaign distraction......though the Clinton pic was great..... I miss the guy!!!!!!

quote:

ORIGINAL: Baroana
Depends. For example, I work for an insurance company where every employee has a numeric "level." We might be paid at different levels even though in reality we do the same work. I hear complaints about it all the time.

quote:

ORIGINAL: FMRFGOPGAL

quote:

ORIGINAL: Baroana
Depends. For example, I work for an insurance company where every employee has a numeric "level." We might be paid at different levels even though in reality we do the same work. I hear complaints about it all the time.

Waves to Baroana!